intertrendsМеждународные процессыInternational Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy1728-27561811-2773AEFIR10.17994/IT.2022.20.3.70.5intertrends-219Research ArticleФИКСИРУЕМ ТЕНДЕНЦИЮCATCHING A TRENDФинансы для либерального порядка. Cравнительный анализ международной деятельности политических фондов ФРГ и филантропических фондов СШАInternational activities of German political foundations and American philanthropic funds. A comparative analysisСутыринВ.SutyrinV.

Вячеслав Сутырин

Москва

 

Vyacheslav Sutyrin

Moscow, 119454

Moscow, 119049

vsutyrin@gaugn.ruМГИМО МИД России; Государственный академический университет гуманитарных наукРоссияMGIMO University; State Academic University for the HumanitiesRussian Federation2022300920222035579Copyright © Сутырин В., 20222022Сутырин В.Sutyrin V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.intertrends.ru/jour/article/view/219

За счёт дистанцирования от официальной дипломатии и формально-юридической автономии, при сохранении системы согласований между крупными фондами и государствами происхождения, фонды получают широкое пространство манёвра, проникая в общества зарубежных стран и оказывая влияние на чувствительные сферы – образование, внутреннюю политику, экспертное сообщество и медиа. Это формирует множество связей и точек воздействия на общество и власть целевой страны «изнутри», которые могут быть использованы для достижения целей внешней политики государства происхождения фонда. В условиях роста международной конфронтации эти возможности западных фондов сокращаются, но они постоянно ищут новые точки приложения сил в разных регионах в интересах своих бенефициаров. Опыт деятельности западных фондов сегодня активно применяется другими странами, в том числе незападными, и заслуживает внимательного анализа.

The paper is aimed at investigating the influence of political foundations upon internal and external policy of a state, analyzing place and role of foundations in international relations. The relevance of the topic under investigation is stipulated by the expansion of semi-official and guerilla diplomacy instruments in governments’ external policy toolkits, which are widely financed by political foundations. The paper deals with the development of contemporary political foundations of the USA and Germany, including comparative analysis of performance features. The classification of foundation functions in the context of international relations is introduced. A conclusion is drawn that German political foundations are designed according to a model of a ministry of foreign affairs with the elements of a political party whereas a typical American philanthropic foundation is based on a model of a business corporation. German representatives tend to be present on the spot, continuously make contacts and keep track of local developments. The Americans apply project-based approach, and aim at creating NGOs or partnerships geared towards concrete actions or tasks making claims for international legitimacy. Foundations in Germany and the US are different in terms of funding models, degree of governmental involvement, scale and methods both serve as proxies and commentators of ruling elites' ideology contributing to foreign policy aims of their countries of origin. Foundations due to distancing from official diplomacy and legal autonomy (although activities of major foundations are frequently adjusted to the policy of a state of origin) achieve a wide room for maneuver. They penetrate into foreign societies and exert influence over sensitive spheres of modern statehood, such as education, domestic policy, expert community, media, etc. Hence a great deal of ties and points of influence “from inside” upon social and power structures of a foreign country are shaped, and could be exploited to further interests of a state of foundations’ origin. Experience of Western foundations is actively employed by other states and organizations, including non-Western. A range of tools could be applied for the strengthening of bilateral and multilateral cooperation within the framework of the Eurasian integration project of Russia according to the principles of mutuality and inclusivity.

политические фондыгуманитарное влияние«мягкая сила»международные отношенияфилантропияобществоСШАГерманияpolitical foundationshumanitarian influencesoft powerinternational relationsphilanthropysocietyUSAGermanyReferencesБайков А., Винью А. Почему государства заимствуют экологические нормы: опыт России //Международные процессы. 2019. No 4. C. 137–153.(2012). Mezhdunarodnyj tribunal po byvshej Jugoslavii: Dejatel'nost', rezul'taty, jeffektivnost'. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii (Moskva, 22–23 aprelja 2009 g.) [The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia: activities, results, effectiveness]. Moscow: Indrik. 544 p.Бек У. Власть и её оппоненты в эпоху глобализма. Новая всемирно-политическая экономия. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2007. 464 с. Большова Н.Н. Государственная политика в области высшего образования и науки как инструмент мягкой силы (Опыт Германии) // Вестник МГИМО. 2014. No 2. С. 71–80.Aksartova S. (2009). Promoting Civil Society or Diffusing NGOs. In: Heydemann S., Hemmack D. (eds) Globalization, Philanthropy, and Civil Society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. P. 160–191.Истомин И.А., Байков А.А. Альянсы на службе гегемонии: деконструкция инструментария военно-политического доминирования // Полис. Политические исследования. 2020. No 6. C. 8–25.Anheier H. (2018). Philanthropic Foundations in Cross-National Perspective: A Comparative Approach. American Behavioral Scientist. Vol. 62. P. 1591–1602.Ланьшина Т.А. Мягкая сила Германии: культура, образование, наука // Вестник международных организаций. 2014. No 2. С. 28–57.Anheier H., Toepler S. (2020). The Routledge Companion to Nonprofit Management. London: Routledge. 560 p.Международный трибунал по бывшей Югославии: Деятельность, результаты, эффективность. Материалы Международной научной конференции (Москва, 22–23 апреля 2009 г.) / Отв. ред. Е.Ю. Гуськова. М.: Индрик, 2012. 544 с.Anheier H. (2018). Performance Measurement in Philanthropic Foundations: The Ambiguity of Success and Failure. London: Routledge. 216 p.Михайленко Е.Б. От политики убеждения к дипломатии. Уроки международной кампании по запрещению ядерного оружия // Международные процессы. 2022. Т. 20. No 1(68). С. 55–79Anheier H., Leat D. (2013). Philanthropic Foundations: What Rationales? Social Research. Vol. 80. P. 449–472.Огнева А.В. Политические фонды ФРГ и их вклад в развитие международного диалога // Вестник Томского гос. ун-та. 2011. No4. С. 113–118.Baykov A., Crowley-Vigneau A. (2019). Pochemu gosudarstva zaimstvujut jekologicheskie normy: opyt Rossii [Transnational Networks and Russia's Environmental Policies]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. No. 4. P. 137–153.Писарев И.И. Политика групп интересов в Европейском Союзе в сфере высшего образования. [Текст]: дисс. ... канд. полит. наук: 23.00.04: защищена 29.03.2022. М.: МГИМО, 2022. 235 с.Bek U. (2007). Vlast’ i ee opponenty v jepohu globalizma. Novaja vsemirnopoliticheskaja jekonomija [Power and its Opponents in the age of globalisation]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsija. 464 p.Погорельская С.В. Неправительственные организации и политические фонды во внешней политике Федеративной Республики Германия. М.: Наука, 2009. 215 с.Berman E. (1983). The Influence of the Carnegie, Ford, and Rockefeller Foundations on American Foreign Policy: The Ideology of Philanthropy. New York: Suny Press. 238 p.Погорельская С.В. Деятельность германских политических фондов в средиземноморских странах ЕС в период кризиса еврозоны (на примере Греции) // Актуальные проблемы Европы. 2014. No2. C. 56–75.Bol'shova N.N. (2014). Gosudarstvennaja politika v oblasti vysshego obrazovanija i nauki kak instrument mjagkoj sily (Opyt Germanii) [Public Policy in the Sphere of Higher Education as a tool for soft power (Germany’s Experience)]. Vestnik MGIMO. No. 2. P. 71–80.Сутырин В.В. Гуманитарное влияние во внешней политике: ресурсы, каналы, инфраструктуры //Общественные науки и современность. 2020. No 5. С. 5–20.Boesso G., Cerbioni F., Kumar K. (2014). What Drives Good Philanthropy? The Relationship Between Governance and Strategy in Foundations. In Luca G., Hinna A., Monteduro F. (eds)Mechanisms, Roles and Consequences of Governance: Emerging Issues. Emerald Group Publishing. P. 159–180.Тоганова Н.В. Экономика и безопасность как мотивы помощи развитию: пример Германии // Mеждународные процессы. 2018. No 3. С. 39–55.Brown R. (2020). Alternatives to soft power: Influence in French and German external cultural action. The Routledge Handbook of Soft Power. Ed. by N. Chitty, L. Ji, G. Rawnsley, C. Hayden. London: Routledge. P. 37–47.Шаклеина Т.А. Лидерство и современный мировой порядок // Международные процессы. 2015. No 4. С. 6–19.Burns R. (2019). New Frontiers of Philanthro-capitalism: Digital Technologies and Humanitarianism. Antipode. Vol. 51. P. 1101–1122.Adick C., Giesemann M. Relevance of German Political Foundations for Comparative Educational Research // Journal of Education and Research. 2015. Vol. 5. P. 7–24.Çevik S. (2019) Reassessing Turkey’s Soft Power: The Rules of Attraction. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. Vol. 44. P. 50–71.Aksartova S. Promoting Civil Society or Diffusing NGOs // Globalization, Philanthropy, and Civil Society /Ed. by Heydemann S., Hemmack D. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009. P. 160–191.Cumings B. (2014). Biting the Hand That Feeds You: Why the “Intelligence Function” of American Foundation Support for Area Studies Remains Hidden in Plain Sight. Global Society. Vol. 28. P. 70–89.American Foundations and the Coproduction of World Order in the Twentieth Century / Ed. by Krige J., Rausch H. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2012. 301 p.Cunningham H. (2016). The multi-layered history of Western philanthropy. In: Jung T., Phillips S., Harrow J. (eds) The Routledge Companion to Philanthropy. London: Routledge. P. 42–55.Anheier H. Philanthropic Foundations in Cross-National Perspective: A Comparative Approach // American Behavioral Scientist. 2018. Vol. 62. P. 1591–1602.Grincheva N., Kelley R. (2019). Introduction: Non-state Diplomacy from Non-Western Perspectives. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy. Vol. 14. P. 199–208.Anheier H., Toepler S. The Routledge Companion to Nonprofit Management. London: Routledge, 2020. 560 p.Halberstam D. (1973). The Best and the Brightest. New York: Fawcett-Crest. 720 p.Anheier H. Performance Measurement in Philanthropic Foundations: The Ambiguity of Success and Failure. London: Routledge, 2018. 216 p.Istomin I., Baykov A. (2020). Aljansy na sluzhbe gegemonii: dekonstruktsiya instrumentariya voenno-politicheskogo dominirovaniya [Alliances at the Service of Hegemony: Deconstruction of the Military Domination Toolbox]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2020. No. 6. P. 8–25.Anheier H., Leat D. Philanthropic Foundations: What Rationales? Social Research. 2013. Vol. 80. P. 449–472.Jung T., Harrow J. (2015). New development: philanthropy in networked governance—treading with care. Public Money & Management. Vol. 35. P. 47–52.Bennett C. What is policy convergence and what causes it? // British Journal of Political Science. 1991. Vol. 21. P. 215–233.Jung T., Harrow J. (2019). Providing Foundations: Philanthropy, Global Policy, and Administration. In: Stone D., Moloney K. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford University Press, 2019. P. 619–637.Berman E. The Influence of the Carnegie, Ford, and Rockefeller Foundations on American Foreign Policy: The Ideology of Philanthropy. New York: Suny Press, 1983. 238 p.Krige J. (2006). American Hegemony and the Postwar Reconstruction of Science in Europe. Cambridge: MIT Press. 384 p.Boesso G., Cerbioni F., Kumar K. What Drives Good Philanthropy? The Relationship Between Governance and Strategy in Foundations // Mechanisms, Roles and Consequences of Governance: Emerging Issues / Ed. by In G.Luca, A.Hinna, F.Monteduro. Emerald Group Publishing, 2014. P. 159–180.Krige J., Rausch H. (2012). American Foundations and the Coproduction of World Order in the Twentieth Century. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 301 p.Brown R. Alternatives to soft power: Influence in French and German external cultural action // The Routledge Handbook of Soft Power / Ed. by N. Chitty, L. Ji, G. Rawnsley, C. Hayden. London: Routledge, 2020. P. 37–47.Lan'shina T.A. (2014). Mjagkaya sila Germanii: kul'tura, obrazovanie, nauka [German Soft Power: culture, education, science]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnyh organizatsij. No. 2. P. 28–57.Burns R. New Frontiers of Philanthro-capitalism: Digital Technologies and Humanitarianism // Antipode. 2019 . Vol. 51. P. 1101–1122.Lipman P. (2015). Capitalizing on crisis: venture philanthropy’s colonial project to remake urban education. Critical Studies in Education. Vol. 56. P. 241–258.Çevik S. Reassessing Turkey’s Soft Power: The Rules of Attraction // Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 2019. Vol. 44. P. 50–71.Lofgren M. (2016) The Deep State. The Fall of the Constitution and the Rise of a Shadow Government. New York: Viking. 336 p.Correa-Cabrera G., Núñez L., Hayden L. Assessing the International Influence of Private Philanthropy: The Case of Open Society Foundations // Global Studies Quarterly. 202. Vol. 1. P. 1–14.Luqiu L., McCarthy J. (2019). Confucius Institutes: The Successful Stealth “Soft Power” Penetration of American Universities. The Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 90. P. 620–643.Cumings B. Biting the Hand That Feeds You: Why the “Intelligence Function” of American Foundation Support for Area Studies Remains Hidden in Plain Sight // Global Society. 2014. Vol. 28. P. 70–89.Mikhaylenko E.B. (2022). Uroki mezhdunarodnoj kampanii po zapreshheniju jadernogo oruzhija [From Advocacy to Diplomacy. The case of the international campaign to abolish nuclear weapons]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 20. No. 1(68). P. 55–79.Cunningham H. The multi-layered history of Western philanthropy // The Routledge Companion to Philanthropy / Ed. by T. Jung, S.Phillips, J.Harrow. London: Routledge, 2016. P. 42–55.Moran M. (2014). Private Foundations and Development Partnerships: American Philanthropy and Global Development Agendas. London: Routledge. 200 p.Dakowska D. German Political Foundations: Transnational party go-betweens in the process of EU enlargement // Transnational European Union. Routledge, 2005. P. 150–169.Nielsen W. (1972). The Big Foundations. New York. 475 p.Gonzalez M. State Department and Congress Should Probe USAID, Soros Promotion of Radical Agenda Overseas // The Heritage Foundation Issue Brief. 2017. No. 4671.Ogneva A.V. (2011). Politicheskie fondy FRG i ih vklad v razvitie mezhdunarodnogo dialoga [Political Foundations of Germany and their Contribution into the Development of International Dialogue]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No. 4. P. 113–118.Grincheva N., Kelley R. Introduction: Non-state Diplomacy from Non-Western Perspectives // The Hague Journal of Diplomacy. 2019. Vol. 14. P. 199–208.Parmar I. (2002). American foundations and the development of international knowledge networks. Global Networks. Vol. 2. P. 13–30.Halberstam D. The Best and the Brightest. New York: Fawcett-Crest, 1973. 720 p.Parmar I. (2014). American Power and Philanthropic Warfare: From the War to End All Wars to the Democratic Peace. Global Society. Vol. 28. P. 54–69.Jung T., Harrow J. New development: philanthropy in networked governance—treading with care //Public Money & Management. 2015. Vol. 35. P. 47–52.Parmar I., Rietzler K. (2014). American Philanthropy and the Hard, Smart and Soft Power of the United States. Global Society. Vol. 28. P. 3–7.Jung T., Harrow J. Providing Foundations: Philanthropy, Global Policy, and Administration // The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration / Ed. by Stone D., Moloney K. Oxford University Press, 2019. P. 619–637.Parmar I. (2012). Foundations of the American Century: The Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller Foundations in the Rise of American Power. New York: Columbia University Pres. 368 p.Katzenstein P. Policy and Politics in West Germany. The growth of a Semi-Sovereign State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1978. 434 p.Pierobon C. (2017). German Political Foundations in Central Asia: Promoting Democracy through Civil Society. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research. Vol. 4. P. 80–86.Krige J. American Hegemony and the Postwar Reconstruction of Science in Europe. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006. 384 p.Pisarev I.I. (2022). Politika grupp interesov v Evropejskom Sojuze v sfere vysshego obrazovanija [Interest group politics in the higher education sphere of the European Union]. diss. kand. polit. nauk: 23.00.04: defended 29.03.2022. Moscow: MGIMO. 235 p.Lambin R., Surender R. The rise of big philanthropy in global social policy: Implications for policy transfer and analysis // Journal of Social Policy. 2021. P. 1–18.Pogorel'skaja S.V. (2009). Nepravitel’stvennye organizatsii i politicheskie fondy vo vneshnej politike Federativnoj Respubliki Germanii [Non-Governmental Organizations and Political Foundations in German Foreign Policy]. Moscow: Nauka. 215 p.Legitimacy of Philanthropic Foundations: United States and European Perspectives / Ed. by Prewitt K., Mattei D., Heydemann S., Toepler S. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2006. 312 p.Pogorel'skaja S.V. (2014). Deyatel’nost’ germanskikh politicheskikh fondov v sredizemnomorskih stranah ES v period krizisa evrozony (na primere Gretsii) [Activities of German Political Foundations in the Mediterranean EU Member-States during the Eurosone Crisis (the Case of Greece)]. Aktual'nye problemy Evropy. No. 2. P. 56–75.Lipman P. Capitalizing on crisis: venture philanthropy’s colonial project to remake urban education //Critical Studies in Education. 2015. Vol. 56. P. 241–258.Prewitt K., Mattei D., Heydemann S., Toepler S. (eds) (2006). Legitimacy of Philanthropic Foundations: United States and European Perspectives. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. 312 p.Loaeza S. The political dimension of Germany’s unintentional power: The KAS and Mexican democratization // Non-state actors in international relations: The case of Germany / Ed. by A.-M. Le Gloannec. Manchester University Press, 2007. P. 46–69.Roelofs J. (2015). How Foundations Exercise Power. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. Vol. 74. P. 654–675.Lofgren M. The Deep State. The Fall of the Constitution and the Rise of a Shadow Government. New York: Viking, 2016. 336 p.Roelofs J. (2003). Foundations and Public Policy: The Mask of Pluralism. State University of New York Press. 284 p.Luqiu L., McCarthy J. Confucius Institutes: The Successful Stealth “Soft Power” Penetration of American Universities // The Journal of Higher Education. 2019. Vol. 90. P. 620–643.Shi Y. (2020). Charitable Foundations and American Diplomacy. IEESASM. London: Francis Academic Press. P. 449–452.Martínez-Zarzoso I., Nowak-Lehmann F., Klasen S., Johannsen F. Does German Development Aid boost German Exports and German Employment? A Sectoral Level Analysis // Journal of Economics and Statistics. 2016. Vol. 236. P. 71–94.Stone D. (2013). Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: The Private-Public Policy Nexus in the Global Agora. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 240 p.Marzo P. Supporting political debate while building patterns of trust: the role of the German political foundations in Tunisia (1989–2017) // Middle Eastern Studies. 2019. Vol. 55. P. 621–637.Shakleina T.A. (2015) Liderstvo i sovremennyj mirovoj porjadok [[Leadership and Current World Order]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. No 4. P. 6–19.Mohr A. The German Political Foundations as Actors in Democracy Assistance. Universal-Publishers, 2010. 442 p.Sussman G., Krader S. (2008) Template Revolutions: Marketing U.S. Regime Change in Eastern Europe. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture. Vol. 5. P. 91–112.Moran M. Private Foundations and Development Partnerships: American Philanthropy and Global Development Agendas. London: Routledge, 2014. 200 p.Sutyrin V.V. (2020). Gumanitarnoe vliyanie vo vneshnej politike: resursy, kanaly, infrastruktury [Humanitarian Influence in Foreign Policy: resources, channels, and infrastructures]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. No. 5. P. 5–20.Nielsen W. The Big Foundations. New York, 1972. 475 p.Toganova N.V. (2018) Jekonomika i bezopasnost' kak motivy pomoshhi razvitiju: primer Germanii [Economic and security motives in international development assistance: The case of Germany]. Mezhdunarodnye processy. No. 3. P. 39–55.Parmar I. American foundations and the development of international knowledge networks // Global Networks. 2002. Vol. 2. P. 13–30.Weaver W. (1967). U.S. Philanthropic Foundations – Their History, Structure, Management and Record. New York: Harper & Row. 492 p.Parmar I. American Power and Philanthropic Warfare: From the War to End All Wars to the Democratic Peace // Global Society. 2014. Vol. 28. P. 54–69.Whitaker B. (1974). The Foundations. An Anatomy of Philanthropy and Society. London: Eyre Methuen. 287 p.Parmar I., Rietzler K. American Philanthropy and the Hard, Smart and Soft Power of the United States//Global Society. 2014. Vol. 28. P. 3–7.Youde J. (2019). The role of philanthropy in international relations. Review of International Studies. Vol. 45. P. 39–56.Parmar I. Foundations of the American Century: The Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller Foundations in the Rise of American Power. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012. 368 p.Parmar I. Foundations of the American Century: The Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller Foundations in the Rise of American Power. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012. 368 p.Pierobon C. German Political Foundations in Central Asia: Promoting Democracy through Civil Society //European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research. 2017. Vol. 4. P. 80–86.Pierobon C. German Political Foundations in Central Asia: Promoting Democracy through Civil Society //European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research. 2017. Vol. 4. P. 80–86.Roelofs J. How Foundations Exercise Power // American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2015. Vol. 74. P. 654–675.Roelofs J. How Foundations Exercise Power // American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2015. Vol. 74. P. 654–675.Roelofs J. Foundations and Public Policy: The Mask of Pluralism. State University of New York Press, 2003. 284 p.Roelofs J. Foundations and Public Policy: The Mask of Pluralism. State University of New York Press, 2003. 284 p.Shi Y. Charitable Foundations and American Diplomacy // IEESASM. London: Francis Academic Press, 2020. P. 449–452.Shi Y. Charitable Foundations and American Diplomacy // IEESASM. London: Francis Academic Press, 2020. P. 449–452.Stone D. Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: The Private-Public Policy Nexus in the Global Agora. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. 240 p.Stone D. Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: The Private-Public Policy Nexus in the Global Agora. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. 240 p.Stone D. Private philanthropy or policy transfer? The transnational norms of the Open Society Institute//Policy & Politics. 2010. Vol. 38. P. 269–287.Stone D. Private philanthropy or policy transfer? The transnational norms of the Open Society Institute//Policy & Politics. 2010. Vol. 38. P. 269–287.Strachwitz R. The Role of Foundations in Public Debates in Germany // American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2015. Vol. 74. P. 826–852.Strachwitz R. The Role of Foundations in Public Debates in Germany // American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2015. Vol. 74. P. 826–852.Sussman G., Krader S. Template Revolutions: Marketing U.S. Regime Change in Eastern Europe. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture. 2008. Vol. 5. P. 91–112.Sussman G., Krader S. Template Revolutions: Marketing U.S. Regime Change in Eastern Europe. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture. 2008. Vol. 5. P. 91–112.Weaver W. U.S. Philanthropic Foundations – Their History, Structure, Management and Record. New York: Harper and Row, 1967. 492 p.Weaver W. U.S. Philanthropic Foundations – Their History, Structure, Management and Record. New York: Harper and Row, 1967. 492 p.Whitaker B. The Foundations. An Anatomy of Philanthropy and Society. London: Eyre Methuen, 1974. 287 p.Whitaker B. The Foundations. An Anatomy of Philanthropy and Society. London: Eyre Methuen, 1974. 287 p.Youde J. The role of philanthropy in international relations // Review of International Studies. 2019. Vol. 45. P. 39–56.Youde J. The role of philanthropy in international relations // Review of International Studies. 2019. Vol. 45. P. 39–56.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.