<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">intertrends</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Международные процессы</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1728-2756</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1811-2773</issn><publisher><publisher-name>AEFIR</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.46272/IT.2024.22.1.76.5</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">intertrends-466</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ФИКСИРУЕМ ТЕНДЕНЦИЮ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CATCHING A TREND</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Называя партнёра угрозой: Россия в доктринальных документах Германии (1990-2023)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Labeling Partner as a Threat: Russia in German Doctrinal Documents (1990–2023)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Токарев</surname><given-names>Алексей</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Tokarev</surname><given-names>Alexey</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">a.tokarev@inno.mgimo.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кучеров</surname><given-names>Михаил</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kucherov</surname><given-names>Mikhail</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ермак</surname><given-names>Кристина</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Ermak</surname><given-names>Kristina</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГИМО МИД России, Москва</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>MGIMO University, Moscow, 119454</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>10</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title>СИЛА УБЕЖДЕНИЯ</issue-title><fpage>124</fpage><lpage>147</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Токарев А., Кучеров М., Ермак К., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Токарев А., Кучеров М., Ермак К.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Tokarev A., Kucherov M., Ermak K.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.intertrends.ru/jour/article/view/466">https://www.intertrends.ru/jour/article/view/466</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье разобрано содержание 13 доктринальных документов Германии с 1990 по 2023 год: коалиционные договоры, Белые книги бундесвера и Стратегия национальной безопасности. Авторы представляют модель анализа доктрин, отражающую ретроспективное и перспективное видение немецкими правящими кругами России, США, Франции и Китая. Базу данных для применения модели составляют упоминания в этих документах 176 стран, организаций и географических регионов. Использованы три критерия: приоритетность, частотность и качество упоминаний стран. В совокупности их анализ позволил выявить иерархию кластеров, к которым государства могут быть отнесены, и провести разделительные линии между этими группами. Конкретные слова-маркеры говорят о восприятии Москвы и Пекина как партнёров и соперников одновременно, а Вашингтона и Парижа — как надёжных союзников, несмотря на некоторые разногласия. Отдельные категории свидетельствуют о включении стран в западную «ценностную семью» либо о нахождении за её пределами, а также о значительном весе держав на мировой арене, с чем ФРГ необходимо считаться. Данные представлены в виде таблиц, разделённых на кластеры. Верифицирована многогранность доктринального положения зарубежных партнёров: иногда они представлены во всех четырёх ипостасях. В условиях размытых границ между позитивными и негативными оценками межгосударственных отношений авторы предлагают оригинальную программу исследования немецких доктринальных документов, которая позволяет сформировать страновую иерархию германской внешней политики. В финальной части изложен дизайн возможных исследований с применением данной методологической схемы.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article examines 13 doctrinal documents of Germany from 1990 to 2023: coalition agreements, Bundeswehr White Papers and National Security Strategy. The authors presented an analysis model reflecting German elites’ both retrospective and perspective vision of Russia, the USA, France and China. The database for the application of the model consists of the references in these documents to 176 countries, organizations and regions. Three criteria were applied: priority, frequency and quality of objects’ mentions. Taken together, their analysis made it possible to create the hierarchy of clusters into which states can be classified. Specific marker words indicate the perception of Moscow and Beijing as partners and rivals at the same time. When it comes to Washington and Paris, they are deemed reliable allies. Certain categories show the states’ inclusion in the Western “family of values” or their non-belonging to it, as well as their significant weight on the global arena, which Germany must take into account. The data is presented in tables divided into clusters. The complexity and versatility of foreign partners’ doctrinal position has become obvious: in some cases they combine four dimensions. Each object was considered not only as an “actor-goal”, but also as an “actor-means”. In the context of blurred boundaries between positive and negative definitions of interstate relations, the authors propose a research programme for studying German doctrinal documents. This approach forms a country hierarchy of German foreign policy. The final part encompasses the design of potential studies conducted on the basis of this methodological scheme.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>российско-германские отношения</kwd><kwd>внешняя политика</kwd><kwd>доктрины</kwd><kwd>коалиционный договор</kwd><kwd>Белая книга</kwd><kwd>безопасность</kwd><kwd>контент-анализ</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Russian-German relations</kwd><kwd>foreign policy</kwd><kwd>doctrines</kwd><kwd>security</kwd><kwd>content-analysis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Басов Ф.А. Концептуальный вакуум: российское направление внешней политики четвёртого кабинета А. Меркель // Анализ и прогноз. Журнал ИМЭМО РАН. 2019. №1. С. 59–69.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Basov F.A. (2019). Kontseptual'nyy vakuum: rossiyskoe napravlenie vneshney politiki chetvertogo kabineta A. Merkel' [Conceptual vacuum: Russian direction of the A. Merkel’s fourth cabinet]. Analiz i prognoz. Zhurnal IMEMO RAN. No. 1. P. 59–69.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Белозёров В.К. Германия конструирует стратегическую культуру // Россия в глобальной политике. 2023. Т. 21. № 5. С. 166–177.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belov V.B. (ed.) (2017). Germaniya. 2016 [Germany. 2016]. Moscow: Institut Evropy RAN. 130 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Власов Н.А. Россия в политике безопасности ФРГ на современном этапе // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Международные отношения. Т. 11. № 2. С. 184–199. DOI: 10.21638/ 11701/spbu06.2018.205</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belozerov V.K. (2023). Germaniya konstruiruet strategicheskuyu kul'turu [Germany is constructing a strategic culture]. Rossiya v global'noy politike. Vol. 21. No. 5. P. 166–177.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Германия. 2016 / Отв ред. В.Б. Белов. М.: Ин-т Европы РАН, 2017. 130 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bendiek A., Bossong R. (2022). «Hybrid threats»: from a strategic compass to a national security strategy. Berlin: Foundation for Science and Politics (SWP). 9 p. DOI: 10.18449/2022A40</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Грачёва М.В. Развитие немецкого бизнеса в России в 2020–2021 гг: мнение топ-менеджеров // Российский экономический барометр. 2021. № 1(81). С. 11–20. DOI: 10.20542/2307-0390- 2021-1-11-20</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bersenev A. (2022). Putin-Versteher: An analysis of German anti-establishment parties’ policy narratives towards the Russian government: Master Thesis. Enschede: University of Twente. 98 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Девятков А.В. Прагматизм немецкой Ostpolitik: возможности и вызовы для России // Перспективы. 2016. № 6 (2). С. 45–59.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blumenau B. (2022). Break conventions? Zeitenwende and the traditional pillars of German foreign policy. International Affairs. Vol. 98. No. 6. P. 1895–1913. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiac166</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Крылова Е.А. Научная дипломатия как шанс для российско-германского сотрудничества // Молодой учёный. 2020. №42 (332). URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/332/74176/ (дата обращения: 14.10.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dembińska M., Mérand F., Shtaltovna A. (2020). Conflict and Cooperation Between Europe and Russia: the Autonomy of the Local. East European Politics. Vol. 36. No. 4. P. 477–498. DOI: 10.1080/ 21599165.2020.1784145</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Липинский Д.А., Мусаткина А.А. Социальная и гуманистическая направленность в стратегиях национальной безопасности России и Германии: сравнительный политико-правовой анализ // Сравнительная политика. 2019. Т. 10. № 3. С. 58–73.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Devyatkov A.V. (2016). Pragmatizm nemetskoy Ostpolitik: vozmozhnosti I vyzovy dlya Rossii [The pragmatism of Germany’s Ostpolitik: opportunities and challenges for Russia]. Perspektivy. № 6 (2). P. 45–59.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Меден Н.К. Германия–Россия: две страны, две нации, совместная история. Размышления в связи с выходом новой книги российского историка / Н. К. Меден, А. М. Филитов // Журнал «История». 2017. № 9(63). С. 5. EDN ZXQZRX</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Doty R. (1997). Imperial Encounters. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 213 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Павлов Н.В. История внешней политики Германии от Бисмарка до Меркель. М.: Международные отношения, 2012. 800 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dyson T. (2016). Energy Security and Germany's Response to Russian Revisionism: the Dangers of Civil Power. German politics. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 500–518. DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2015.1133607</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Погорельская С.В. Влияние иммигрантов на немецкое общество: Взаимная интеграция // Актуальные проблемы Европы. 2010. № 4. С. 34–70.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Edelman M. (1972). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois press. 201 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Потапенко К.С., Пузынина Л.А. Russland und Deutschland: Zusammenarbeit unter den Bedingungen der Sanktionen und der Corona Virus-Infektion // Cборник трудов научно-практической конференции преподавателей, аспирантов, магистрантов и студентов Новосибирского ГАУ. 2021. С. 915–916.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">George J. (1994). Discourses of Global Politics. A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. 226 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рубинский Ю.И., Синдеев А.А. Франко-германский тандем: настройка на будущее // Аналитические записки Института Европы РАН. 2022. Т. 4. № 29 (296). С. 52–58. DOI: 10.15211/ analytics42920225258</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gracheva M.V. (2021). Razvitie nemetskogo biznesa v Rossii v 2020–2021 godakh: mnenie topmenedzherov [Development of German business in Russia in 2020–2021: opinion of top managers]. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy barometr. No. 1(81). P. 11–20. DOI: 10.20542/2307-0390-2021-1- 11-20</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Синдеев А.А. Новые идеи СДПГ в политике безопасности и обороны // Историческая германистика: актуальные проблемы современных исследований: Сб. научных статей и материалов / Под ред. В.А. Космача. Псков: Логос, 2023. С. 308–317.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gross M., Krauss S. (2019). Topic Coverage of Coalition Agreements in Multi-Level Settings: The Case of Germany. German Politics. 2019. Vol. 30. No. 2. P. 227–248. DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2019. 1658077</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Соколов А.П., Воротников В.В., Давыдов А.Д. Изменение через отдаление: правительство Олафа Шольца и российско-германские отношения. М.: МГИМО-Университет, 2023. 40 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hamzaoglu H. (2022). Post-Cold War Russian-German Relations: The New Balance of Powers in Europe? The Journal of Social Science. Vol. 6. No. 12. P. 223–233. DOI: 10.30520/tjsosci.1138650</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сугоняев П.М. Доктринальные документы России и Германии о двусторонних отношениях // ГОСРЕГ: государственное регулирование общественных отношений. 2020. №1(31). С. 98–106.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lough J. The Re-calibration of Germany’s Russia Policy // The Conference on Russia Papers / ed. by S. Šrāders. Tartu: University of Tartu Press, 2023. P. 33–45.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Трунов Ф.О. Кризис военного присутствия ФРГ на международной арене в начале 2020-х гг. // Россия и современный мир. 2023. № 4. С. 136–153.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krylova E.A. (2020). Nauchnaya diplomatiya kak shans dlya rossiysko-germanskogo sotrudnichestva [Scientific diplomacy as an opportunity for Russian-German cooperation]. Molodoy uchenyy. No. 42 (332). URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/332/74176/ (accessed: 14.10.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bersenev A. Putin-Versteher: An analysis of German anti-establishment parties’ policy narratives towards the Russian government: Master Thesis. Enschede: University of Twente, 2022. 98 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lipinsky D.A., Musatkina A.A. (2019). Sotsial'naya i gumanisticheskaya napravlennost' v strategiyakh natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii i Germanii: sravnitel'nyi ̆ politiko-pravovoi ̆ analiz [Social and humanistic ̆ orientation in the national security strategies of Russia and Germany: comparative political and legal analysis]. Sravnitel'naya politika. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 58–73.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blumenau B. Break conventions? Zeitenwende and the traditional pillars of German foreign policy // International Affairs. 2022. Vol. 98. No. 6. P. 1895–1913. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiac166</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Мeden N.K. Filitov A.M. (2017). Germaniya-Rossiya: dve strany, dve natsyi, sovmestnaya istoriya. Razmyshleniya v svyazi s vykhodom novoy knigi rossiyskogo istorika [Germany and Russia: two countries, two nations, common history. Reflections on the release of a new book by a Russian historian]. Zhurnal “Istoriya”. No. 9(63). С. 5. EDN ZXQZRX</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dembińska M., Mérand F., Shtaltovna A. Conflict and cooperation between Europe and Russia: the autonomy of the local // East European Politics. 2020. Vol. 36. No. 4. P. 477–498. DOI: 10.1080/ 21599165.2020.1784145</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mello P. (2021). German Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Change in European Union Countries Since 1991. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, P. 1–23. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68218-7_7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Doty R. Imperial Encounters. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997. 213 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Milliken J. (1999). The Study of Discourse in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 225–254. DOI: 10.1177/135406619900500200</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dyson T. Energy Security and Germany's Response to Russian Revisionism: the Dangers of Civil Power // German politics. 2016. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 500–518. DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2015.1133607</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pavlov N.V. (2012). Istoriya vneshney politiki Germanii ot Bismarka do Merkel' [History of German foreign policy from Bismarck to Merkel]. Moscow: International Relations. 800 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Edelman M. The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois press, 1972. 201 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pogorelskaya S.V. (2010). Vliyanie immigrantov na nemetskoe obshchestvo: Vzaimnaya integratsiya [The Influence of Immigrants on German Society: Mutual Integration]. Aktual'nye problemy Evropy. No. 4. P. 34–70.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">George J. Discourses of Global Politics. A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1994. 226 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Potapenko K.S., Puzynina L.A. Russland und Deutschland: Zusammenarbeit unter den Bedingungen der Sanktionen und der Corona Virus-Infektion // Proceedings of the scientific and practical conference of teachers, graduate students, undergraduates and students of Novosibirsk GAU. 2021. P. 915–916.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gross M., Krauss S. Topic Coverage of Coalition Agreements in Multi-Level Settings: The Case of Germany // German Politics. 2019. Vol. 30. No. 2. P. 227–248. DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2019.1658077</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rubinsky Yu.I., Sindeev A.A. (2022). Franko-germanskiy tandem: nastroyka na budushchee [FrancoGerman Tandem: Setting up for the Future]. Analiticheskie zapiski Instituta Evropy RAN. Vol. 4. No. 29 (296). P. 52–58. DOI: 10.15211/analytics42920225258</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hamzaoglu H. Post-Cold War Russian-German Relations: The New Balance of Powers in Europe? // The Journal of Social Science. 2022. Vol. 6. No. 12. P. 223–233. DOI: 10.30520/tjsosci.1138650</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Siddi M.A. (2018). A controversial hegemon? Germany's leadership in EU relations with Russia. German politics. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 97–114. DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2018.1551485</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lough. J. The Re-calibration of Germany’s Russia Policy // The Conference on Russia Papers / ed. by S. Šrāders. Tartu: University of Tartu Press, 2023. P. 33–45.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sindeev A.A. (2023). Novye idei SDPG v politike bezopasnosti i oborony [New Ideas of the SPD in Security and Defense Policy]. In: V. A. Kosmach (ed.) Istoricheskaya germanistika: aktual'nye problemy sovremennykh issledovaniy: sb. nauchnykh statey i materialov [Historical Germanistics: Actual problems of Modern Research: Collection of Scientific Articles and Materials]. Pskov: Logos. P. 308–317.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mello P. (2021). German Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Change in European Union Countries Since 1991. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, P. 1–23. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68218-7_7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sokolov A.P., Vorotnikov V.V., Davydov A.D. (2023). Izmenenie cherez otdalenie: pravitel'stvo Olafa Shol'tsa i rossiysko-germanskie otnosheniya [Change Through Distancing: Olaf Scholz's Government and Russian-German Relations]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet. 40 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Milliken J. The Study of Discourse in International Relations // European Journal of International Relations. 1999. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 225–254. DOI: 10.1177/135406619900500200</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sugonyaev P.M. (2020). Doktrinal'nye dokumenty Rossii i Germanii o dvustoronnikh otnosheniyakh [Doctrinal Documents of Russia and Germany on Bilateral Relations]. GOSREG: gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie obshchestvennykh otnosheniy. No. 1 (31). P. 98–106.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Siddi M. A controversial hegemon? Germany's leadership in EU relations with Russia // German politics. 2018. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 97–114. DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2018.1551485</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Szabo S. (2018). Different approaches to Russia: the German-American-Russian strategic triangle. German politics. Vol. 27. No. 2. P. 230–243. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2018.1446081</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Szabo S. Different approaches to Russia: the German-American-Russian strategic triangle // German politics. 2018. Vol. 27. No. 2. P. 230–243. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2018.1446081</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trunov F.O. (2023). Krizis voennogo prisutstviya FRG na mezhdunarodnoy arene v nachale 2020-kh godov [The Crisis of the German Military Presence in the International Arena in the Early 2020s]. Rossiya i sovremennyy mir. No. 4. P. 136–153.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Umland A. Germany’s Russia Policy in Light of the Ukraine Conflict: Interdependence Theory and Ostpolitik // ORBIS. 2022. Vol. 66. No. 1. P. 78–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.orbis.2021.11.007</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Umland A. (2022). Germany’s Russia Policy in Light of the Ukraine Conflict: Interdependence Theory and Ostpolitik. ORBIS. Vol. 66. No. 1. P. 78–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.orbis.2021.11.007</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vlaemink E. City Relations Between Hamburg and St. Petersburg: А State of Play // Побратимство городов: состояние, возможности развития, вызовы, приоритеты. Международная научно-практическая конференция (Москва, Тюмень, 23–24 апреля 2021). Тюмень: ТюмГУ, 2021. С. 7–13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vlaemink E. (2021). City Relations Between Hamburg and St. Petersburg: А State of Play. Pobratimstvo gorodov: sostoyanie, vozmozhnosti razvitiya, vyzovy, prioritety. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya [Collection of the International Conference “Twinning of cities: state, development opportunities, challenges, priorities”] (Moscow, Tyumen, April 23–24 2021). Tyumen: TSU. P. 7–13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Westphal K. Germany and the EU-Russia energy dialogue // The EU-Russian Energy Dialogue: Europe's Future Energy Security / ed. by P. Aalto. Aldershot: Ashgate Press, 2008. P. 93–118.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vlasov N.A. (2018). Rossiya v politike bezopasnosti FRG na sovremennom etape [Russia in the security policy of Germany at present]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 184–199. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu06.2018.205</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Westphal K. (2008). Germany and the EU-Russia energy dialogue. In: P. Aalto (ed.) The EU-Russian Energy Dialogue: Europe's Future Energy Security. Aldershot: Ashgate Press. P. 93–118.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Westphal K. (2008). Germany and the EU-Russia energy dialogue. In: P. Aalto (ed.) The EU-Russian Energy Dialogue: Europe's Future Energy Security. Aldershot: Ashgate Press. P. 93–118.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
