<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">intertrends</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Международные процессы</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1728-2756</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1811-2773</issn><publisher><publisher-name>AEFIR</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17994/IT.2019.17.2.57.7</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">intertrends-564</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ФИКСИРУЕМ ТЕНДЕНЦИЮ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CATCHING A TREND</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Кризис отношений ФРГ и США на современном этапе: военно-политическая составляющая</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Crisis in Relations between Germany and the USA</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Трунов</surname><given-names>Филипп</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Trunov</surname><given-names>Philipp</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Трунов Филипп Олегович - кандидат политических наук, старший научный сотрудник Отдела Европы и Америки Института по научной информации по общественным наукам РАН</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr Philipp Trunov - Senior Research Fellow, Department for Europe and America,Institute for Scientific Information in Social Sciences of the RussianAcademy of Sciences</p><p>Moscow, 117997</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">1trunov@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ИНИОН РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>INION RAS</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>05</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>131</fpage><lpage>148</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Трунов Ф., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Трунов Ф.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Trunov P.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.intertrends.ru/jour/article/view/564">https://www.intertrends.ru/jour/article/view/564</self-uri><abstract><p>Во второй половине 2010-х годов Запад сталкивается с масштабными вызовами не только извне, но и изнутри, причём источниками последних стали США и Великобритания, сыгравшие огромную роль в формировании и динамичном развитии евроатлантического сообщества. К глубокой трансформации отношений внутри сообщества с пересмотром сложившихся норм поведения и снижением роли многосторонних структур стремится администрация Д. Трампа, а ключевым защитником традиций выступает ФРГ. С 1990-х годов эта страна постепенно двигалась к статусу региональной, а с начала XXI в. – глобально действующей державы. Происходящие в евроатлантической региональной подсистеме процессы расширяют Германии «окно возможностей» для упрочения лидерства на всех уровнях. Задача настоящей статьи – изучить динамику, промежуточные итоги и перспективы развития отношений ФРГ и США при администрации Д. Трампа в политико-военной области. Основными методами исследования выступают ивент-анализ и компаративный анализ. Проведено сравнение двух кризисов в отношениях ФРГ и США: 2002– 2005 гг. и современного. Показана нелинейная динамика и многогранный характер последнего, особенно в области безопасности вообще и в рамках НАТО в частности. Выделены три основных этапа в отношениях ФРГ и США после 2016 года. Изучены особенности использования Германией своих политико-военных возможностей на каждом из этих этапов в ответ на «сугубо наступательную» дипломатию 45-го президента США, в том числе на создание им «стратегических шоков» для партнёра. Особое внимание уделено ответной стратегии ФРГ, сформулированной к сентябрю 2018 года. Рассмотрены возможности России по углублению диалога с Германией и Соединёнными Штатами Америки на фоне кризиса их отношений. Сделан вывод о высокой вероятности преодоления противоречий между ФРГ и США.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>During the second half of 2010-s the West faces the full-scale challenges not only outside but within. The sources of the threats became the USA and the United Kingdom, They traditionally played the key role in creation and dynamic development of Euro-Atlantic society but now some of their steps are the challenges for it. Trump`s administration has been trying to transform deeply the Euro-Atlantic community. These plans include the revision of political behavior norms and the limitation of the role of multilateral structures. Germany tries to play the role of the key protector of traditional Western political rules. Since the 1990-s Germany affirmed the regional power. Since the beginning of the XXI century the country tries to achieve the role of global power. The modern processes in the Euro-Atlantic regional system widen the window of opportunity for the strengthening of German leadership at all levels. The goal of the article is to explore the dynamics, interim results and perspectives of the relations between the USA and Germany during Trump`s presidency. The focused field of the relations is the political-military sphere. The key research methods are event-analysis and comparative analysis. The paper tries to compare two crises in US-German relations (2002–2005 and modern) based on the distinguished parameters. The article shows non-linear dynamics and more versatile character of the modern one (first of all in the sphere of security and in NATO in particular). The scientific research distinguishes three key periods in the bilateral relations during Trump`s presidency. The article also explores the features of the usage by Germany its political-military tools during every period as an answer to the ,especially offensive Trump`s diplomacy, including his initiation of the ,,strategic shocks,, for German partner. The research paper investigates the concept of the answer behavior which was formulated by September 2018. In this regard the paper pays attention to Russian opportunities in the deepening dialog with Germany and the USA during the crisis in their relations. The article concludes about opportunities of overcoming of the crisis by Germany and the United States.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Германия</kwd><kwd>США</kwd><kwd>Трамп</kwd><kwd>внешняя политика</kwd><kwd>НАТО</kwd><kwd>международная безопасность</kwd><kwd>международный терроризм</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Germany</kwd><kwd>USA</kwd><kwd>Trump</kwd><kwd>foreign policy</kwd><kwd>NATO</kwd><kwd>international security</kwd><kwd>international terrorism</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Арзаманова Т.В. Позиция Германии во время ливийского кризиса-2011: Новая внешнеполитическая стратегия или предвыборный манёвр? // Европейская безопасность: события, оценки, прогнозы. 2011. № 26 (42). С. 11–15.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arzamanova T.W. (2011). Positziya Germanii vo vremya livijskogo krizisa-2011: novaya vneshnepoliticheskaya strategiya ili predvibornyi manyevr? [German position during Libyan crisis-2011: the new foreign policy strategy or manevour before the elections?]. Evropeyskaya bezopasnost': sobityia, otzenki, prognozi. 26 (42). P. 11–15.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пименова Е.В. «Трансатлантический мост» под ударом: чем обернётся кризис в отношениях ФРГ и США // Сравнительная политика. 2019. № 1. С. 148–156.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dobbin J. (2018). A look at NATO Funding. RAND-Corporation. July. URL: https://www.rand.org/ blog/2018/07/a-look-zt-nato-funding.html</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тренин Д.В. Россия и Германия: от отчуждения к новому соседству // Московский центр Карнеги.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Donaque P. (2018). Merkel rejects Trump`s link between EU trade, defense spending. Bloomberg. July. URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-07-12/merkel-rejects-trump-s-link-betweeneu-trade-defense-spending</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Май 2018. URL: https://carnegie.ru/2018/05/31/ru-pub-76743</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dröge S. (2018). Climate and Security Revisited. SWP-Aktuell. August. № 34. 4 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Трунов Ф.О. Двусоставная модель развития вооружённых сил ФРГ // Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2017. № 3 (54). С. 179–200.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glantz R.L., Zapfe M. (2018). Ambitionierte Rahmennation: Deutschland in der NATO. SWP-Aktuell. August. № 62. 8 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Трунов Ф.О. Политика ФРГ в НАТО и украинские события // Современная Европа. 2016. № 5. С. 33–43.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kamp K.-H. (2016). Verpflichtungen in der NATO. Mehr Geld für die Bundeswehr. Arbeitspapier Sicherheitspolitik. Bundesakademie für Sicherheitspolitik. Vol. 12. 4 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">von Bredow W. Die Geschichte der Bundeswehr. Berlin: Palm Verlag, 2017. 160 S. von Daniels L. Die Handelspolitik der US-Regierung // SWP-Aktuell. Juli 2018. № 40. 4 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lake E. (2018). Trump, Macron and Merkel have an opportunity in Iran`s crisis. Bloomberg. April. URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-04-24/iran-nuclear-trump-macron-merkel-shouldagree-to-stall</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dobbin J. A look at NATO Funding. RAND-Corporation. July 2018. URL: https://www.rand.org/blog/ 2018/07/a-look-zt-nato-funding.html</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lough J. (2018). Germany's Russia Challenge (Fellowship monograph). Naples, Research Division NATO Defense College. 47 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Donaque P. Merkel rejects Trump`s link between EU trade, defense spending. Bloomberg. July 2018. URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-07-12/merkel-rejects-trump-s-link-betweeneu-trade-defense-spending</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maior C. (2018). Ein schwieriger Gipfel für die NATO. SWP-Aktuell. Juni. № 33. 4 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dröge S. Climate and Security Revisited // SWP-Aktuell. August 2018. № 34. 4 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Meier O. (2019). Rüstungskontrolle jenseits des INF-Vertrags. SWP-Aktuell. April. № 20. 4 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Glantz R.L., Zapfe M. Ambitionierte Rahmennation: Deutschland in der NATO // SWP-Aktuell. August 2018. № 62. 8 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Murciano G. (2018). Preventing a Spillover of the Iran-Israel Conflict in Syria. SWP-Aktuell. July. № 27. 8 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kamp K.-H. Verpflichtungen in der NATO. Mehr Geld für die Bundeswehr // Arbeitspapier Sicherheitspolitik. Bundesakademie für Sicherheitspolitik. 2016. № 12. 4 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Overhaus M. (2019). Eine Frage der Glaubwürdigkeit. Konventionelle und nukleare Sicherheitszusagen der USA in Europa. SWP-Studie. Juni. 42 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lake E. Trump, Macron and Merkel have an opportunity in Iran`s crisis. Bloomberg. April 2018. URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-04-24/iran-nuclear -trump-macron-merkel-shouldagree-to-stall</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pimenova E.V. (2019). «Transatlanticheskij most» pod udarom: chem obernetsja krizis v otnoshe-nijah FRG i SShA [“Transatlantic Bridge” under attack: what will the crisis be in relations between Germany and the USA]. Sravnitel'naja politika. 1. P. 148–156.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lough J. Germany`s Russia Challenge (Fellowship monograph). Naples: Research Division NATO Defense College, 2018. 47 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rudolf P. (2018a). US-Geopolitik und nukleare Abschreckung in der Ära neuer Großmachtrivalitäten. SWP-Studie. Mai. 30 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maior C. Ein schwieriger Gipfel für die NATO // SWP-Aktuell. Juni 2018. № 33. 4 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rudolf P. (2018b). Nicht allein Trump ist das Problem – Zum Umgang Deutschlands mit den USA. SWPAktuell. Oktober. № 57. 8 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Meier O. Rüstungskontrolle jenseits des INF-Vertrags // SWP-Aktuell. April 2019. № 20. 4 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schmieg E. (2018). Macht im internationalen Handelssystem. SWP-Aktuell. Juli. № 37. 4 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Murciano G. Preventing a Spillover of the Iran-Israel Conflict in Syria // SWP-Aktuell. July 2018. № 27. 8 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schulz R. (2019). Streitkräfte europäischer denken. SWP-Aktuell. September. № 48. 4 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Overhaus M. Eine Frage der Glaubwürdigkeit. Konventionelle und nukleare Sicherheitszusagen der USA in Europa // SWP-Studie. Juni 2019. 42 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trenin D.V. (2018). Rossia i Germania: ot otchuzhdenia k novomy sosedstvy [Russia and Germany: from trangement to the new neighbourhood?]. Mai. Moscow Carnegie Center. URL: https://carnegie. ru/2018/05/31/ru-pub-76743</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rudolf P. US-Geopolitik und nukleare Abschreckung in der Ära neuer Großmachtrivalitäten // SWP-Studie. Mai 2018. 30 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trunov Ph.O. (2016). Politika NATO i ukrainskickie sobitiya [German policy in NATO and the Ukranian events]. Sovremennaya Evropa. Vol. 5. P. 33–43.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rudolf P. Nicht allein Trump ist das Problem – Zum Umgang Deutschlands mit den USA. // SWP-Aktuell. Oktober 2018. № 57. 8 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trunov Ph.O. (2017). Dvysostavnaya model` razvitya vooruzhunnich sil FRG [The dual model of the development of German armed forces]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. 3 (54). P. 179–200.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schmieg E. Macht im internationalen Handelssystem // SWP-Aktuell. Juli 2018. № 37. 4 S. Schulz R. Streitkräfte europäischer denken // SWP-Aktuell. September 2019. № 48. 4 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">von Bredow W. (2017). Die Geschichte der Bundeswehr. Berlin, Palm Verlag. 160 S. von Daniels L. (2018). Die Handelspolitik der US-Regierung. SWP-Aktuell. Juli. № 40. 4 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
