intertrendsМеждународные процессыInternational Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy1728-27561811-2773AEFIR10.17994/IT.2019.17.2.57.12intertrends-571Research ArticleSCRIPTA MANENTSCRIPTA MANENTОсвобождение от иллююзийFarewell to DelusionsНеклюдовНикитаNeklyudovNikita

Неклюдов Никита Яковлевич - магистрант МГИМО МИД России

Mr Nikita Neklyudov - Graduate Student, MGIMO University

МГИМО МИД РоссииРоссияMGIMO UniversityRussian Federation201915052025172189195Copyright © Неклюдов Н., 20252025Неклюдов Н.Neklyudov N.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.intertrends.ru/jour/article/view/571

Рецензия на книгу: Миршаймер Дж. Великое заблуждение: либеральные мечты и международные реалии. Йель юниверсити пресс, 2018. 518 p.

A book review: Mearsheimer J. The Great Delusion. Liberal Dreams and International Realities. London and New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018. 518 p.

ReferencesИстомин И.А. Логика поведения государств в международной политике. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2018. 296 с.Angell N. (1910). The Great Illusion. A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to theirИстомин И.А. Рефлексия международной системы в официальном дискурсе и научном осмыслении // Вестник МГИМО. 2016. Т. 50. № 1. С. 20–33.Economic and Social Advantage. New York and London: The Knickerbocker Press. 388 p.Шаклеина Т.А. Россия и США в мировой политике. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2017. 336 с.Fordham B.O. (2009). The limits of neoclassical realism: additive and interactive approaches to explaining foreign policy preferences. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Eds. Lobell S.E., Ripsman N.M., and Taliaferro J.W. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 251–279.Angell N. The Great Illusion. A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to their Economic and Social Advantage. New York and London: The Knickerbocker Press, 1910. 388 p.Istomin I. (2016). Refleksiнa mezhdynarodnoо sistemy v ofiеыialnom discurse i naychnom osmyslenii [Reflection of International System in the Official Discourse and Scientific Comprehension]. Vestnik MGIMO. Vol. 50. No.1. P. 20–33.Fordham B.O. The limits of neoclassical realism: additive and interactive approaches to explaining foreign policy preferences // Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy / Eds. Lobell S.E., Ripsman N.M., and Taliaferro J.W. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. P. 251–279.Istomin I. (2018). Logica povedenia gosudarstv v mezhdynarodnoi politke [The Logic of States’ Behaviour in International Politics]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. 294 p.Legro J.W., Moravcsik A. Is Anybody Still a Realist? // International Security, 1999. Vol. 24. No. 2.Legro J.W., Moravcsik A. (1999). Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security. Vol. 24. No. 2.P. 5–55.P. 5–55.Mearsheimer J. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War // International Security, 1990. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 5–56.Mearsheimer J. (1990). Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. InternationalMearsheimer J. Benign Hegemony // International Studies Review, 2016. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 1–3.Security. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 5–56.Mearsheimer J. The False Promise of International Institutions // International Security. 1994. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 5–49.Mearsheimer J. (1994). The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 5–49.Mearsheimer J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2001. 592 p.Mearsheimer J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. 592 p.Rosato S. The inscrutable intentions of great powers // International Security. 2015. Vol. 39. No. 3. P. 48–88.Mearsheimer J. (2016). Benign Hegemony. International Studies Review. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 1–3.Sterling-Folker J. Neoclassical realism and identity: peril despite profit across the Taiwan Strait //Rosato S. (2015). The inscrutable intentions of great powers. International Security. Vol. 39. No. 3. P. 48–88.Neoclassical Realism,the State, and Foreign Policy/ Eds.Lobell S.E., Ripsman N.M., and Taliaferro J.W. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. P. 99–138.Shakleina T. (2017). Rossia i SSHA v mirivoy politike [Russia and the USA in World Politics]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. 336 p.Taliaferro J.W. Neoclassical realism and resource extraction: State building for future war // Neo-classical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy / Eds. Lobell S.E., Ripsman N.M., and Taliaferro J.W. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. P. 194–226.Sterling-Folker J. (2009). Neoclassical realism and identity: peril despite profit across the Taiwan Strait. In: Lobell S.E., Ripsman N.M., and Taliaferro J.W. (Eds.) Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 99–138.Taliaferro J.W. (2009). Neoclassical realism and resource extraction: State building for future war.Taliaferro J.W. (2009). Neoclassical realism and resource extraction: State building for future war.In: Lobell S.E., Ripsman N.M., and Taliaferro J.W. (Eds.) Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 194–226.In: Lobell S.E., Ripsman N.M., and Taliaferro J.W. (Eds.) Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 194–226.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.