<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">intertrends</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Международные процессы</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1728-2756</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1811-2773</issn><publisher><publisher-name>AEFIR</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17994/IT.2016.14.3.46.5</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">intertrends-758</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АНАЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ПРИЗМЫ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ANALYTICAL PRISMS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Китайская теория международных отношений: становление национальной школы</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Chinese School of International Relations Theory</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Грачиков</surname><given-names>Евгений</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Grachikov</surname><given-names>Evgeny</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Грачиков Евгений Николаевич – кандидат политических наук, доцент Кафедры сравнительной политологии Факультета политологии МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr Evgeny Grachikov – Associate Professor, Department of Comparative Politics, School of Political Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University</p><p>Moscow, 119991</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">egrachikov@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>08</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>68</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Грачиков Е., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Грачиков Е.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Grachikov E.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.intertrends.ru/jour/article/view/758">https://www.intertrends.ru/jour/article/view/758</self-uri><abstract><p>За последние двадцать лет (1995–2015) китайская школа международных отношений (МО) прошла интенсивный путь развития от «копирования» и «переписывания» западных идей до выработки вполне самостоятельных концепций, некоторые из которых претендуют на универсальность. Ученые из КНР, опираясь на западные теории и часто полемизируя с их постулатами, привносят свой исторический опыт, философское осмысление и императивы традиционной культуры. В дополнение к западной рациональности они предложили «отношения», «мораль» и «семейные принципы» в качестве оснований новой организации мирового политического пространства. Процесс заимствования в китайском академическом сообществе продолжается, но китайские исследователи перешагнули порог интеллектуальной самоколонизации и стали «фабрикой по производству международных знаний». В Китае уже сформулированы главные концепции международных отношений «с китайской спецификой», которые можно рассматривать как попытки создания собственной «большой теории».</p><p>В статье дается краткая периодизация развития китайской теории международных отношений (ТМО) и рассматриваются основные положения концепции мирового института «Тянься» Чжао Тиняна, «теории морального реализма» Янь Сюетуна и «теории отношений» Цинь Яцина, которые сегодня представляют главные тренды китайской теории международных отношений, осмысленные в формате больших теорий – идеализма, реализма и конструктивизма, обогащенные собственным научным языком и богатой политической практикой.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Over the last twenty years (1995–2015), the Chinese School of International Relations has intensively expanded its work from making “copies” and “rewritings” of Western ideas to developing completely independent concepts, some of which claim are flexible and versatile. Scientists from the PRC have studied Western theories and argued with their postulates, bringing their historical experience, and philosophical understanding of the imperatives of a traditional culture. In addition to Western rationality, they offer “relationship”, “morality” and “family principles” as a basis of a new world political space. The process of borrowing in the Chinese academic community continues but it seems that Chinese researchers have already crossed a dangerous threshold of intellectual self­colonization and have become “a factory for the production of international knowledge”. China has formulated the main concepts of international relations “with Chinese characteristics”, which can be seen as attempts to create its own “big theory”. The article gives a brief periodization of the development of the Chinese IR Theory and examines the main provisions of Zhao Tingyang’s concept of global institute of “Tianxia”, Yan Xuetong's “theory of moral realism”, and Qin Yaqing's “theory of relations”, which today are the main trends of the Chinese IRT which fit into the format of big theories – idealism, realism, and constructivism, enriched with their own scientific language and a rich political practice.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>китайская ТМО</kwd><kwd>культура</kwd><kwd>традиции</kwd><kwd>система Тянься</kwd><kwd>теория отношений</kwd><kwd>теория морального реализма</kwd><kwd>Чжао Тинян</kwd><kwd>Янь Сюетун</kwd><kwd>Цинь Яцин</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Chinese IR theory</kwd><kwd>culture</kwd><kwd>traditions</kwd><kwd>Tianxia system</kwd><kwd>theory of relations</kwd><kwd>theory of moral realism</kwd><kwd>Zhao Tingyang</kwd><kwd>Yan Xuetong</kwd><kwd>Qin Yaqing</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Арин О.А. (2013). От Сунь Цзы до Джозефа Ная // «Азия и Африка сегодня». № 5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Acharya A. (2011). Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories beyond the West. Millennium. 39.3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бергер Я.М. (2010). Эволюция геополитических взглядов в Китае // «Проблемы Дальнего Востока». № 4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arin O.A. (2013). Ot Sun Zi do Dzhozefa Naya [From Sun Zi to Joseph Nye]. Aziya i Afrika segodnya. No. 5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Воскресенский А.Д. (2013). Мировое комплексное регионоведение и перспективы построения незападной (китаизированной) теории международных отношений // «Полис. Политические исследования», № 6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berger Y.М. (2010). Evolyutsiya geopoliticheskikh vzglyadov v Kitae [Evolution of Chinese geopolitical viewpoints]. Problemy Dalnego Vostoka. No. 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Грачиков Е.Н. (2014a). Утопизм в теории международных отношениях Китая // IX Международная научная конференция «Сорокинские чтения»: Приоритетные направления развития социологии в XXI веке: К 25-летию социологического образования в России. Сборник материалов. Электронное издание. М.: Издательство Московского университета.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Borah J. (2013). Chinese International Relations Theory: Is It a Narrative of China’s Rise? Annual International Studies Convention 2013 being organised by the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU). New Delhi. 10 - 12 December 2013.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Грачиков Е.Н. (2014b). Международные отношения в современном Китае: институализация дисциплины // «Международные процессы», № 4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Buzan B. (2010). China in International Society: Is ‘Peaceful Rise’ Possible? The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 3, No. 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Королев А., Чжан Жуйчжуан (2010). Теория международных отношений с китайской спецификой: современное состояние и тенденции развития // «Проблемы Дальнего Востока». № 3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Callahan W. (2001). China and the Globalization of IR Theory: Discussing «Building International Relations Theory with Chinese Characteristics. Journal of Contemporary China, 10 (26).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кузнецов А.М. (2014). «Мирное развитие Китая» и некоторые проблемы современной теории международных отношений // «Политическая концептология». № 3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chan, Gerald (1999). Chinese Perspective on International Relations: A Framework for Analysis. London: MacMillan Press Ltd.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Цыганков П. А., Грачиков Е. Н. (2015). Проблема мирового порядка в китайской и российской политической науке: Общее и особенное // «Политическая наука». № 4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dellios R. (2011). International relations theory and Chinese philosophy. Bond University. Humanities &amp; Social Sciences papers. Paper 570. URL: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/hss_pubs/570.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чжао Тинян. Современный взгляд на китайскую мечту // «Международные процессы». 2015. Т. 13, № 2, сс. 21-34.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Geeraerts G., Men J. (2001). International relations theory in China. Global Society. Vol. 15, No. 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Acharya, Amitav (2011). “Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories beyond the West” // Millennium 39.3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grachikov E.N. (2014a).  Utopizm v teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy Kitaya [Utopianism in the Chinese IR Theory]. IX Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya "Sorokinskiye chteniya": Prioritetnye napravleniya razvitiya sotsiologii v XXI veke.  K 25 letiyu sotsiologicheskogo obrazovaniya v Rossii. Sbornik materialov. Elektronnoye izdaniye. Moscow: Publishing house of Moscow University.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Borah, Jayshree (2013). ‘Chinese International Relations Theory: Is It a Narrative of China’s Rise?’, Annual International Studies Convention 2013 being organised by the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi. 10 - 12 December 2013.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grachikov E.N. (2014b). Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya v sovremennom Kitaye: institualizatsyya distsipliny [IR in Modern China: institualisation of the discipline]. Mezhdunarodnyye protsessy. No. 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Buzan, Barry (2010). «China in International Society: Is ‘Peaceful Rise’ Possible?» // The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 3, No. 1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">He Fang (1992). Jianli you Zhongguo de guoji guanxi lilun [Creation Chinese IR theory]. Shijie jingji yu zhengzhi. No. 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Callahan, William (2001). China and the Globalization of IR Theory: Discussing «Building International Relations Theory with Chinese Characteristics» // Journal of Contemporary China, 10 (26).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Korolev А., Zhang Ruizhuang (2010). Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy s kitayskoy spetsifikoy: sovremennoye sostoyaniye i tendentsii razvitiya [IR Theory with Chinese characters: present state and development trends ]. Problemy Dalnego Vostoka. No. 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chan, Gerald (1999). Chinese Perspective on International Relations: A Framework for Analysis. London: MacMillan Press Ltd.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuznetsov А.М. (2014). «Mirnoye razvitiye Kitaya» i nekotorye problemy sovremennoi teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [«China's peaceful development» and some problems of modern IR theory]. Politicheskaya kontseptologiya. No. 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dellios, Rosita (2011). International relations theory and Chinese philosophy. Bond University. Humanities &amp; Social Sciences papers. Paper 570. URL: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/hss_pubs/570 (access 15.05.16).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hung-jen Wang (2013). The Rise of China and Chinese IR Scholarship. Lexington Books.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Geeraerts, G., Men, J. (2001), ‘International relations theory in China’ // Global Society, vol. 15, no. 3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Johnston A.I. (2003). The State of International Relations Research in China: Consideration for the Ford Foundation. Beijing: Ford Foundation.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">He Fang (1992). Jianli you Zhongguo de guoji guanxi lilun [Creation of Chinese IR Theory] // “Shijie jingji yu zhengzhi” [«World Economics and Politics»]. № 1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Li Wei (2007). Zhongguo guoji guanxi yanjiude “lilun jinbu” yu “wenti queshi” – jianping “Zhongguo guoji guanxi yanjiu (1995-2005)” [“Theoretical Progress” and “Lack of Problems” in Chinese IR Studies – review of “IR Studies in China (1995-2005)”]. Shijie jingji yu zhengzhi. No. 9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hung-jen Wang (2013). The Rise of China and Chinese IR Scholarship. Lexington Books.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Li Shaojun (2009). Guoji zhengzhixue gailun (di san ban) [Introduction to International Politics (third edition)]. Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Johnston, Alastair Iain (2003). The State of International Relations Research in China: Consideration for the Ford Foundation. Beijing: Ford Foundation.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Liang Shoude (2005). Zhongguo guoji zhengzhixue lilun jianshe de tansuo [In search of Chinese IR Theory]. Shijie jingji yu zhengzhi. No. 2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Li Wei (2007). Zhongguo guoji guanxi yanjiude “lilun jinbu” yu “wenti queshi” – jianping “Zhongguo guoji guanxi yanjiu (1995-2005)” [“Theoretical Progress” and “Lack of Problems” in Chinese IR Studies – review of “IR Studies in China (1995-2005)”] // “Shijie jingji yu zhengzhi” [«World Economics and Politics»], № 9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Noesselt N. (2015). Revisiting the Debate on Constructing a Theory of IR with Chinese Characteristics. The China Quarterly. Volume 222.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Li Shaojun (2009). Guoji zhengzhixue gailun (di san ban) [Introduction to International Politics (third edition)]. Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Qin Yaqing. (2013). Culture and global thought: Chinese international theory in the making. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, n.100.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liang Shoude (2005). Zhongguo guoji zhengzhixue lilun jianshe de tansuo [In search of Chinese IR Theory] // “Shijie jingji yu zhengzhi” [«World Economics and Politics»]. № 2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Qin Yaqing. (2012). Guanxi yu Guocheng: Zhongguo Guoji Guanxi Lilun de Wenhua Jiangou [Relations and Processes: Cultural Construction of Chinese IR Theory]. Shanghai: Shanghai Peoples Publishing House.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Noesselt, Nele (2015). Revisiting the Debate on Constructing a Theory of IR with Chinese Characteristics // «The China Quarterly». Volume 222.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Qin Yaqing. (2009). Development of International Relations Theory in China. International Studies. 46, 1&amp;2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Qin Yaqing (2013). «Culture and global thought: Chinese international theory in the making» // Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, n.100.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Qin Yaqing (2008). Zhongguo Guoji Guanxi Lilun [Development of International Relations Theory in China], in: Wang Yizhou (ed.). Zhongguo Duiwai Guanxi Zhuanxing 30 Nian: 1978-2008. Beijing: Shehui Kexue Wenxian Chubanshe.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Qin Yaqing (2012). Guanxi yu Guocheng: Zhongguo Guoji Guanxi Lilun de Wenhua Jiangou [Relations and Processes: Cultural Construction of Chinese IR Theory]. Shanghai: Shanghai Peoples Publishing House.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsygankov P. А., Grachikov Е. N. (2015). Problemy mirovogo poryadka v kitaiskoi i rosiiskoi politicheskoi nauke: obshchee i osobennoe [Problems of World Order in Chinese and Russian Political Science: the general and the distinctive features]. Politicheskaya Nauka. No. 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Qin Yaqing (2009). Development of International Relations Theory in China // International Studies 46, 1&amp;2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Qin Yaqing. (2007). Why Is There No Chinese International Relations Theory. International Relations of the Asia Pacific. vol. 7, No.3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Qin Yaqing (2008). «Zhongguo Guoji Guanxi Lilun» [Development of International Relations Theory in China], in: Wang Yizhou (ed.). Zhongguo Duiwai Guanxi Zhuanxing 30 Nian: 1978-2008 [China’s Foreign Relations: Thirty Years’ Transformation, 1978-2008]. Beijing: Shehui Kexue Wenxian Chubanshe.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thuy T Do. (2014). China’s Rise and the ‘Chinese Dream’ in IR Theory. Department of International Relations. The Australian National University. Refereed paper presented to the Second Oceanic Conference on International Studies. University of Melbourne. 9-11 July.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Qin Yaqing (2007). «Why Is There No Chinese International Relations Theory» // International Relations of the Asia Pacific, vol. 7, No.3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Voskresenskiy А.D. (2013). Mirnoye kompleksnoye regionovedeniye i perspektivy postroeniya ne-zapadnoy (kitaezirovannoy) teorii mezhunarodnykh otnosheniy [World complex regional studies and prospects for the construction of non-Western (sinicized) theory of international relations]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. No. 6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wang Fan, Qu Bo (ed.) (2013). Guoji guanxi lilun: sixiang, fanshi yu minti [Theories of International Relations: Thoughts, Paradigms and Hypotheses]. Beijing: Shijie zhishi chubanshe.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wang Fan, Qu Bo (ed.) (2013). Guoji guanxi lilun: sixiang, fanshi yu minti [Theories of IR: Thoughts, Paradigms and Hypotheses]. Beijing: Shijie zhishi chubanshe.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wang Yizhou (ed.) (2006). Zhongguo guoji guanxi yanjiu (1995-2005) [IR studies in China: 1995-2005]. Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wang Yizhou (ed.) (2006). Zhongguo guoji guanxi yanjiu (1995-2005) [IR studies in China: 1995-2005]. Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yan Xuetong (2015). Shijie quanli de zhuanyi: zhengzhi lingdao yu zhanlue jingzheng [The Transition of World Power: Political Leadership and Strategic Competition]. Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yan Xuetong. (2015). Shijie quanli de zhuanyi: zhengzhi lingdao yu zhanlue jingzheng [The Transition of World Power: Political Leadership and Strategic Competition]. Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yan Xuetong (2012). Zhongguo Zhengduo Daoyi Zhigaodian Xue Jiejiao Mengyou [China Needs to Form Alliances to Compete for the Dominating Height of Morality]: http://view.news.qq.eom/a/20111208/00002l_l.htm.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yan Xuetong (2012). Zhongguo Zhengduo Daoyi Zhigaodian Xue Jiejiao Mengyou [China Needs to Form Alliances to Compete for the Dominating Height of Morality]. URL: http://view.news.qq.eom/a/20111208/00002l_l.htm (access 20.05.16)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yan Xuetong (2011). Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yan Xuetong (2011). Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhao Tingyang (2005). Tianxia Tixi: Shijie Zhidu Zhexue Daolun [Tianxia System: An Introduction to the Philosophy of World Institutions]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Jiaoyu Chubanshe.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhao Tingyang. (2015). Sovremennyj vzglyad na kitajskuyu mechtu [Current View on Chinese Dream]. Mezhdunarodnye Protsessy. Vol. 13, No. 2. P. 21-34.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhao Tingyang (2005). Tianxia Tixi: Shijie Zhidu Zhexue Daolun [Tianxia System: An Introduction to the Philosophy of World Institutions]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Jiaoyu Chubanshe.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhao Tingyang (2005). Tianxia Tixi: Shijie Zhidu Zhexue Daolun [Tianxia System: An Introduction to the Philosophy of World Institutions]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Jiaoyu Chubanshe.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
