<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">intertrends</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Международные процессы</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1728-2756</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1811-2773</issn><publisher><publisher-name>AEFIR</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">intertrends-892</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АНАЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ПРИЗМЫ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ANALYTICAL PRISMS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>К определению принципа баланса сил: опыт неоинституционального подхода к международной среде</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Balance of Power Principle Revisited: The Neoinstitutionalism Approach to Defining the Classical Category</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Зобнин</surname><given-names>Алексей</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zobnin</surname><given-names>Alexey</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Зобнин Алексей Владимирович – кандидат исторических наук, директор Ивановского государственного историко-краеведческого музей имени Д.Г. Бурылина</p><p>Иваново</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr Alexey Zobnin – Director, Burylin Ivanovo State LocalLore Museum</p><p>Ivanovo, 153025</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">alexzobnin1982@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Ивановский государственный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Ivanovo State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>55</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Зобнин А., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Зобнин А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zobnin A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.intertrends.ru/jour/article/view/892">https://www.intertrends.ru/jour/article/view/892</self-uri><abstract><p>На фоне меняющейся международной среды возникает необходимость пересмотра теоретических и концептуальных подходов к изучению международных отношений. Одним из принципов, требующих такого переосмысления, является понятие «баланса сил», теоретические основы которого были заложены в отличных от сегодняшних мирополитических условиях. Анализ развития концепции «баланса сил» показывает, что с течением времени ее трактовки заметно изменялись и дополнялись новыми аргументами, что привело к понятийной многозначности и даже размытости. Заметны также различия подходов к «балансу сил» во внешнеполитической практике различных государств. Эволюционировало и само понятие силы в международных отношениях, а также способы ее применения. Во второй половине XX в. сформировались новые условия, диктующие потребность критического подхода к традиционному реалистскому пониманию принципа «баланса сил», что привело к возникновению новых концептуальных моделей, объясняющих поведение субъектов мировой политики.</p><p>Автор данной статьи изучает основные теоретические подходы к принципу «баланса сил» и приходит к выводу о необходимости обновления интерпретации этого принципа ввиду противоречий в его трактовке, а также изменений международной среды, в которой он реализуется в современном мире. В статье уделяется внимание такому фактору, как структура международного переговорного процесса, изменение которой отражается на расширении спектра возможных способов обеспечения баланса сил. В результате автор, рассматривая принцип баланса сил с точки зрения неоинституционализма, приходит к выводу о том, что его следует понимать как систему ожиданий, внешнеполитических установок и рациональностей, которые формируют поведение субъектов в мировой политике и обусловливают равновесие в международной среде.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In the changing conditions of the international environment, there is a clear demand for reassessing theoretical and conceptual approaches to international studies. Among the concepts that have to be revised is the ‘balance of power’ principle, which was formulated in conditions very much different from what is happening today in world politics. Analyzing the evolution of the ‘balance of power’ concept, one may conclude that the understanding of the concept has been changing with new arguments having been added to it. This led to polysemanticism and vagueness of the term. Apart from that, it has become obvious that western and oriental states practice different approaches to the implementation of ‘balance of power’. Furthermore, the concept of power in international relations itself has evolved considerably, as have the ways of exercising it. For instance, in addition to the use of force as a means of reacting to external threats, some nontraditional non-force methods have been practiced. The conditions of the international environment since the second half of the 20th century demand a more critical approach to the classical realist application of ‘balance of power’, which has encouraged new models of international behavior for states to develop. The author of the article studies the main theoretical approaches to the ‘balance of power’ principle and concludes that it has to be re-interpreted and re-defined because of the existing ambiguity and the changing conditions of the international environment. The article also concentrates on the structure of the international negotiation process, whose changes broaden the spectrum of possible ways in ensuring the balance of power. The author, who is studying the principle from the neoinstitutionalist angle, states that it is to be defined as a set of expectations, attitudes and rational approaches to foreign policy that define the behavior of states in world politics and secure certain balance in the international environment.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>принцип «баланса сил»</kwd><kwd>современная международная среда</kwd><kwd>неоинституционализм</kwd><kwd>конструктивизм</kwd><kwd>международная социально-политическая коммуникация</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>‘balance of power’ principle</kwd><kwd>modern international environment</kwd><kwd>neoinstitutionalism</kwd><kwd>constructivism</kwd><kwd>international socio-political communication</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Браун С. Сила в инструментарии современной дипломатии // Международные процессы. 2004. № 2. С. 4-20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Braun S. 2004. Sila v instrumentarii sovremennoi diplomatii [The power of the modern diplomacy instruments]// Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. No. 2. P. 4-20.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Донжес П. Политические акторы в институциональном контексте // Политика и личность / Под ред. Й. Поллака, Ф. Загера, У. Сарцинелли, А. Циммер. Харьков: Гуманитарный центр, 2012. С. 37-50.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brooks S.G., Wohlforth W.C. 2011. Assessing the Balance // Cambridge Review of International Affairs. Vol. 24. No. 2. P. 201-219.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зобнин А.В. Проблема манипулирования в ходе международных консультаций // Международные процессы. 2013. № 1. С. 16-28.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bull H. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan. 335 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зобнин А.В. Международные псевдоконсультации в структурах Организации Варшавского Договора // Политика и общество. 2013. № 8. С. 1021-1028.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Claude I. 1989. The Balance of Power Revisited // Review of International Studies. P. 77-85.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Исраэлян В.Л. Дипломаты лицом к лицу. М.: Международные отношения, 1990. 352 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cohen E.A. 1996. A Revolution in Warfare // Foreign Affairs. No. 2. P. 37-54.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фоссум Й.Э. Принцип баланса сил: стабильность и сила в международных отношениях // Теория и методы в современной политической науке: Первая попытка теоретического синтеза / Под ред. С.У. Ларсена. М.: РОССПЭН, 2009. С. 230-254.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Craig G.A., George A.L. 1995. Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problems of Our Time. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 304 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хрусталев М.А. Методология анализа международных переговоров // Международные процессы. 2004. № 3. С. 64-78.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Di Maggio P., Powell W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields // American Sociological Review. No. 2. P. 147-160.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brooks S.G., Wohlforth W.C. Assessing the Balance // Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2011. Vol. 24. № 2. P. 201-219.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Doyle M. 1986. Empires. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 407 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bull H. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan, 1977. 335 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Donzhes P. 2012. Politicheskie aktory v institutsional'nom kontekste [Political actors in the institutional context]// Politika i lichnost' / I. Pollaka, F. Zagera, U. Sartsinelli, A. Tsimmer (eds.). Khar'kov: Gumanitarnyi tsentr. P. 37-50.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Claude I. The Balance of Power Revisited // Review of International Studies. 1989. P. 77-85.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Finnemore M., Sikkink K. 2001. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics // Annual Review of Political Science. No. 4. P. 391-416.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cohen E.A. A Revolution in Warfare // Foreign Affairs. 1996. № 2. P. 37-54.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fossum I.E. 2009. Printsip balansa sil: stabil'nost' i sila v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniiakh [The balance of power principle: power and stability in international relations] // Teoriia i metody v sovremennoi politicheskoi nauke: Pervaia popytka teoreticheskogo sinteza / S.U. Larsena (ed.). Moscow. ROSSPEN. P. 230-254.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Craig G.A., George A.L. Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problems of Our Time. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1995. 304 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fritz P., Sweeney K. 2004. The (De)Limitations of Balance of Power Theory // International Interactions. Vol. 30. P. 285-308.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Di Maggio P., Powell W. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields // American Sociological Review. 1983. № 2. P. 147-160.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Haas E.B. 1953. The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept, or Propaganda? // World Politics. Vol. 5. P. 442-477.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Doyle M. Empires. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986. 407 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Israelian V.L. 1990. Diplomaty litsom k litsu [Diplomats face to face]. Moscow. Mezhdnarodnye otnosheniia. 352 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Finnemore M., Sikkink K. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics // Annual Review of Political Science. 2001. №4. P. 391-416.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaplan M. 1975. System and Process in International Politics. N.Y.: J. Wiley. 260 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fritz P., Sweeney K. The (De)Limitations of Balance of Power Theory // International Interactions. 2004. Vol. 30. P. 285-308.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaufman S., Little R., Wohlforth W.C. (eds.). 2007. Balance of Power in World History. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Haas E.B. The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept, or Propaganda? // World Politics. 1953. Vol. 5. P. 442-477.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khrustalev M.A. 2004. Metodologiia analiza mezhdunarodnykh peregovorov [Analysis methology of international negotiations] // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. No. 3. P. 64-78.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kaplan M. System and Process in International Politics. N.Y.: J. Wiley, 1975. 260 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kobrin S. 1997. Electronic Cash: A Glossary // Foreign Policy. No. 107. P. 76-77.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kaufman S., Little R., Wohlforth W.C. (eds.). Balance of Power in World History. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Libicki M.C. 1998. Information War, Information Peace // Journal of International Affairs. No 2. P. 411-413.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kobrin S. Electronic Cash: A Glossary // Foreign Policy. 1997. № 107. P. 76-77.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Libiki M.C. 2007. Conquest in Cyberspace: National Security and Information Warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 336 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Libicki M.C. Information War, Information Peace // Journal of International Affairs. 1998. № 2. P. 411-413.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lijphart A. 1974. The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations // International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 41-74.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Libiki M.C. Conquest in Cyberspace: National Security and Information Warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 336 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Little R. 2007. The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 328 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lijphart A. The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations // International Studies Quarterly. 1974. Vol. 18. № 1. P. 41-74.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Little R. 2007. The Balance of Power in Politics Among Nations // The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations / Ed. by M.C. Williams. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 137-165.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Little R. The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 328 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">March J.G., Olsen J.P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions. N.Y.: Free Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Little R. The Balance of Power in Politics Among Nations // The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations / Ed. by M.C. Williams. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. P. 137-165.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">March J.G., Olsen J.P. 1996. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life // Comparative Politics: Notes and Readings / Ed. by B. Brown, R. Macridis. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Co. P. 289-292.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">March J.G., Olsen J.P. Rediscovering Institutions. N.Y.: Free Press, 1989.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mayer C.S. 2007. Dark Power: Globalization, Inequality, and Conflict // Harvard International Review. Spring. P. 60-65.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">March J.G., Olsen J.P. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life // Comparative Politics: Notes and Readings / Ed. by B. Brown, R. Macridis. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1996. P. 289-292.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McGuire S. 2013. Multinationals and NGOs amid a Changing Balance of Power // International Affairs. Vol. 89. No. 3. P. 695-710.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mayer C.S. Dark Power: Globalization, Inequality, and Conflict // Harvard International Review. 2007. Spring. P. 60-65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McKibben H.E. 2013. The Effects of Structures and Power on State Bargaining Strategies // American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 53. No. 2. P. 411-427.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McGuire S. Multinationals and NGOs amid a Changing Balance of Power // International Affairs. 2013. Vol. 89. № 3. P. 695-710.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morgenthau H.J. 1948. Politics among Nations: The Struggle of Power and Peace. N.Y.: Alfred A. Knopf. 421 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McKibben H.E. The Effects of Structures and Power on State Bargaining Strategies // American Journal of Political Science. 2013. Vol. 53. No. 2. P. 411-427.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moul W.B. 1988. Balances of Power and the Escalation to War of Serious Disputes among the European Great Powers, 1815-1939: Some Evidence // American Journal of Political Science. May 1988. P. 241-275.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morgenthau H.J. Politics among Nations: The Struggle of Power and Peace. N.Y.: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948. 421 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Niou E.M., Ordeshook P., Rose G. 1989. The Balance of Power: Stability in International Systems. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moul W.B. Balances of Power and the Escalation to War of Serious Disputes among the European Great Powers, 1815-1939: Some Evidence // American Journal of Political Science. May 1988. P. 241-275.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nye Jr. J.S. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. N.Y.: Basic Books. 336 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Niou E.M., Ordeshook P., Rose G. The Balance of Power: Stability in International Systems. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1989.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nye Jr. J.S., Owens W.A. 1996. America’s Information Edge // Foreign Affairs. No. 2. P. 20-37.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nye Jr. J.S. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1990. 336 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 298 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nye Jr. J.S., Owens W.A. America’s Information Edge // Foreign Affairs. 1996. № 2. P.20-37.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Patterson J.M. 1969. Corporate Behavior and Balance of Power: Some Uses of the Structural Approach // Business Horizons. June 1969. P. 39-52.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ostrom E. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 298 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Penrose E.F. 1964. Political Development and the Intra-Regional Balance of Power // Journal of Development Studies. October 1964. P. 47-70.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Patterson J.M. Corporate Behavior and Balance of Power: Some Uses of the Structural Approach // Business Horizons. June 1969. P. 39-52.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Powell W., Di Maggio P. (eds.). 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 486 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Penrose E.F. Political Development and the Intra-Regional Balance of Power // Journal of Development Studies. October 1964. P. 47-70.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raiffa H. 1985. Mock Pseudo-Negotiations with Surrogate Disputants // Negotiation Journal. 1985. April. P. 111-115.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Powell W., Di Maggio P. (eds.). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. 486 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rothkopf D.J. 1998. Cyberpolitik: The Changing Nature of Power in the Information Age // Journal of International Affairs. No. 2. P. 325-360.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raiffa H. Mock Pseudo-Negotiations with Surrogate Disputants // Negotiation Journal. 1985. April. P. 111-115.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schelling T. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 309 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rothkopf D.J. Cyberpolitik: The Changing Nature of Power in the Information Age // Journal of International Affairs. 1998. № 2. P. 325-360.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schweller R.L. 2006. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 200 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schelling T. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960. 309 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schweller R. 2011. Emerging Powers in the Age of Disorder // Global Governance. No. 17. P. 285-297.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schweller R.L. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. 200 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scott W.R. 1994. Institutions and Organizations. Toward a Theoretical Synthesis // Institutional Environment and Organizations. Structural Complexity and Individualism / Ed. by W.R. Scott, J.W. Meyer. Thousand Oaks: Sage. P. 55-80.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schweller R. Emerging Powers in the Age of Disorder // Global Governance. 2011. No. 17. P. 285-297.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scott W.R. 2004. Institutional Theory: Contributing to a Theoretical Research Program // Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development / Ed. by K.G. Smith, M.A. Hitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 3-11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Scott W.R. Institutions and Organizations. Toward a Theoretical Synthesis // Institutional Environment and Organizations. Structural Complexity and Individualism / Ed. by W.R. Scott, J.W. Meyer. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994. P. 55-80.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sheehan M. 1996. The Balance of Power: History and Theory. London, N.Y.: Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Scott W.R. Institutional Theory: Contributing to a Theoretical Research Program // Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development / Ed. by K.G. Smith, M.A. Hitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. P. 3-11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sheehan M. 2004. The Sincerity of the British Commitment to the Maintenance of the Balance of Power, 1714-1763 // Diplomacy and Statecraft. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 489-506.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sheehan M. The Balance of Power: History and Theory. London, N.Y.: Routledge, 1996.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Valeriano B. 2009. The Tragedy of Offensive Realism: Testing Aggressive Power Politics Model // International Interactions. Vol. 35. P. 179-206.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sheehan M. The Sincerity of the British Commitment to the Maintenance of the Balance of Power, 1714-1763 // Diplomacy and Statecraft. 2004. Vol. 15. № 3. P. 489-506.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Venkatachar C.S. 1966. The Changing Balance of Power: A View from Asia // Journal of Development Studies. January 1966. P. 174-188.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Valeriano B. The Tragedy of Offensive Realism: Testing Aggressive Power Politics Model // International Interactions. 2009. Vol. 35. P. 179-206.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Walt S.M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit50"><label>50</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Venkatachar C.S. The Changing Balance of Power: A View from Asia // Journal of Development Studies. January 1966. P. 174-188.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Waltz K. 1959. Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. N.Y.: Columbia University Press. 263 p. Waltz K. 1979. Theory of International Politics. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill. 250 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit51"><label>51</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Walt S.M. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1987.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Waltz K. 1993. The Emerging Structure of International Politics // International Security. No. 2. P. 44-79.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit52"><label>52</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Waltz K. Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 1959. 263 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wohlforth W., Little R., Kaufman S.J., Kang D., Jones C.A., Tin-Bor Hui V., Eckstein A., Deudney D., Brenner W.J. 2007. Testing Balance-of-Power Theory in World History // European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 155-185.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit53"><label>53</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Waltz K. Theory of International Politics. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1979. 250 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zartman W., Rubin L. (eds.). 2000. Power and Negotiation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit54"><label>54</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Waltz K. The Emerging Structure of International Politics // International Security. 1993. № 2. P. 44-79.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zobnin A.V. 2013a. Problema manipulirovaniia v khode mezhdunarodnykh konsul'tatsii [The problem of manipulations in the course of international consultations] // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. No. 1. P. 16-28.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit55"><label>55</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wohlforth W., Little R., Kaufman S.J., Kang D., Jones C.A., Tin-Bor Hui V., Eckstein A., Deudney D., Brenner W.J. Testing Balance-of-Power Theory in World History // European Journal of International Relations. 2007. Vol. 13. № 2. P. 155-185.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zobnin A.V. 2013b. Mezhdunarodnye psevdokonsul'tatsii v strukturakh Organizatsii Varshavskogo Dogovora [International pseudo-consultations in the structure of the Warsaw Pact Organization] // Politika i obshchestvo. No. 8. P. 1021-1028.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit56"><label>56</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zartman W., Rubin L. (eds.). Power and Negotiation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zartman W., Rubin L. (eds.). Power and Negotiation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
