The Dilemma of Ensuring Financial Stability and Stimulating Growth of the Russian Economy
https://doi.org/10.46272/IT.2024.22.2.77.5
Abstract
The challenges of the global economy and geopolitical risks have exposed the problems of slowing economic growth and required a rethinking of approaches to curbing inflation. Monetary authorities in advanced economies are forced to adjust to the transition from ultralow interest rates to their significant growth against the backdrop of high public debt, and in developing countries they are forced to continue to look for tools to stimulate business activity in the face of high inflation and interest rates. At the same time, the methods of monetary regulation sometimes do not give the expected results, and the approaches tested in the last century turn out to be insufficiently effective. At the same time, a number of large countries, including Russia, are under severe sanctions restrictions, the history of which is far from its logical conclusion. In this regard, the discussion about stimulating economic growth without compromising financial stability is one of the most relevant and acute. The essence of the problem is as follows: the priority of one of the opposites of the abovementioned dilemma negates the achievement of the goals of the other. The resolution of this contradiction lies in the search for a compromise and extraordinary solutions, which are multifaceted, including the specifics of regulating the financial market and the activities of its institutions, the potential for whose participation in the economic development of the country remains far from being exhausted. In this regard, it is of particular importance to clarify the targets of monetary policy and its impact on the economy. The authors of the article came to the conclusion that it is necessary to change the paradigm of "financial stability" to "stimulating sustainable growth of the national economy" and propose to increase the efficiency of the financial regulator in Russia by separating from the functionality of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation the block of macro and microprudential regulation, as well as supervision over the activities of financial market participants and transferring these functions to an independent body. The proposed measures will allow, according to the authors of the article, to ensure the focus of the institutional model of financial market regulation on achieving the multipurpose task of ensuring financial stability in the context of sustainable growth and digital transformation of the Russian economy.
About the Authors
G. PanovaRussian Federation
Galina Panova – Professor, Department of International Finance
Moscow, 119454
I. Larionova
Russian Federation
Irina Larionova – Professor, Department of Banking and Monetary Regulation
Moscow, 125167
N. Shuba
Russian Federation
Nikita Shuba – Chief Expert
Moscow, 117420
References
1. Afonso A., Blanco-Arana M.C. (2022). Financial and economic development in the context of the global 2008-09 financial crisis. International Economics. Vol. 169. P. 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2021.11.006
2. Andreev M., Peiris U., Shirobokov A., Tsomokos D. (2019). Analiz makroprudentsial'noy politiki i finansovoy (ne)stabil'nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Analysis of Macroprudential Policy and Financial (In) Stability in the Russian Federation]. Finance and Credit. Vol. 78. No. 3. P. 3–37.
3. Bachmann R., Gödl-Hanisch I., Sims E.R. (2022). Identifying Monetary Policy Shocks Using the Central Bank's Information Set. Journal of Economic Dynamics&Control. Vol. 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104555
4. Baker S.R., Bloom N., Davis S.J. (2016). Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 131. No. 4. P. 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
5. Balatsky Ye.V., Yekimova N.A., Yurevich M.A. (2018). Nemonetarnye faktory v transmissionnom mekhanizme denezhno-kreditnoy politiki: peresmotr strategii regulirovaniya inflyatsii [Non-Monetary Factors in the Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism: Revision of the Inflation Management Strategy]. Upravlenets. Vol. 9. No. 5. P. 26–39. DOI:10.29141/2218-5003-2018-9-5-3.
6. Baranov A.O. (2017). Ob iskusstve kompromissa mezhdu tselyami ekonomicheskoy politiki v svete krizisa v Rossii v 2015–2016 gg [On the art of compromise between economic policy objectives in light of the crisis in Russia between 2015 and 2016]. EKO. No. 6. P. 49–63.
7. Baranov A.O., Ageeva E.V. (2021). Vliyanie denezhno-kreditnoy politiki na investitsionnyy kompleks Rossii [Influence of Monetary Policy on the Investment Complex of Russia]. World of Economics and Management. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 5–29. https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2021-21-3-5-29
8. Beck T., Levine R., Loayza N. (2000). Finance and the sources of growth. Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 58. No. 1–2. P. 261–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00072-6
9. Bernanke B.S., Lown C.S. (1991). The Credit Crunch. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. No. 2. P. 205–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534592
10. Burlachkov V.K. (2018). Paradoksy inflyatsionnogo targetirovaniya i determinanty tsenovoy dinamiki v Rossii i mire [Paradoxes of Inflation Targeting and Determinants of Price Dynamics in Russia and the World]. Finance and Credit. Vol. 24. No. 10. P. 2163–2174. https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.24.10.2163
11. Butorina O.V. (2018). Monetarnaya politika ETsB: noveyshie tendentsii [ECB Monetary Policy: Latest Trends]. International Economics. No. 1. P. 37–49.
12. Carpenter S.B., Demiralp S. (2010). Money, Reserves, and the Transmission of Monetary Policy: Does the Money Multiplier Exist? Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Finance and Economics Discussion Series. № 2010-41. P. 19–26.
13. Chen H., Ferrero A. (2012). The macroeconomic effects of large-scale asset purchase programmes. The Economic Journal. Vol. 122. No. 564. P. 289–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02549.x
14. Drehmann M., Gambacorta L. (2012). The effects of countercyclical capital buffers on bank lending. Applied Economic Letters. Vol. 19. No. 7. P. 603–608.
15. Drobyshevskiy S.M., Trunin P.V. (2014). Evolyutsiya teorii i praktiki denezhnokreditnoy politiki v rezul'tate global'nogo ekonomicheskogo krizisa [Evolution of monetary policy theory and practice as a result of the global economic crisis]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii. No. 4(24). P. 141–158.
16. Enste D.H., Hardege S. (2006). IW-Regulierungsindex Methodik, Analysen und Ergebnisse eines internationalen Vergleichs. Köln: Deutscher Instituts-Verlag GmbH. 96 s.
17. Fedorova O.Yu. (2017). Formirovanie effektivnoy modeli regulirovaniya finansovykh rynkov [Forming an effective model of regulation of financial markets.]. PhD dissertation. Moscow: MGIMO University. 219 p.
18. Glazyev S.Yu. (2014). Sanktsii SShA i politika Banka Rossii: dvoynoy udar po natsional'noy ekonomike [U.S. Sanctions and the Policy of the Bank of Russia: A Double Blow to the National Economy]. Voprosy ekonomiki. No. 9. P. 13–29. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-9-13-29
19. Gogichaev Ch. A., Panova G.S. (2024). Netraditsionnaya denezhno-kreditnaya politika i al'ternativnye metody monetarnogo stimulirovaniya ekonomiki [Unconventional monetary policy and alternative methods of monetary stimulation of economy]. Мoscow: Nauchnaya biblioteka. 256 p.
20. Golovnin M.Yu. (2018). Vneshnie effekty denezhno-kreditnoy politiki SShA [External Effects of US Monetary Policy]. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 82–99. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-2-82-99
21. Goryunov E.L., Drobyshevskiy S.M., Mau V.A., Trunin P.V. (2021). Chto my (ne) znaem ob effektivnosti instrumentov DKP v sovremennom mire? [What do we (not) know about the effectiveness of the monetary policy tools in the modern world?]. Voprosy ekonomiki. No. 2. P. 5–34. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-2-5-34
22. Grishchenko V.O., Mihailov A., Tkachev V.N. (2021). Money Creation in Russia: Does the Money Multiplier Exist? University of Reading. Department of Economics. Economic Analysis Research Group (EARG). Discussion Paper. 2021. №. 2021-15. 31 p.
23. Illing G. (2015) Unkonventionelle Geldpolitik – kein Paradigmenwechsel. Perspektiven der Wirtschafts-politik. Vol. 16. No. 2. P.127–150.
24. King G.R., Levine R. (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 108. No. 3. P. 717–737. DOI: 10.2307/2118406
25. Levine R., Loayze N., Beck T. (2000). Financial intermediation and growth: Causality and causes. Journal of Monetary Economics. Vol. 46. No. 1. P. 31–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(00)00017-9
26. Levine R., Zervos S. (1998). Stock markets, banks and economic growth. American Economic Review. Vol. 88. No. 3. P. 537–558.
27. Loayza N., Ranciere R. (2006). Financial Development, Financial Fragility, and Growth. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. Vol. 38. No. 4. P. 1051–1076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2006.0060
28. Pisicoli B. (2023). Financial development, diversity, and economic stability: Micro and systemic evidence. International Economics. Vol. 175. P. 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2023.08.002
29. Rajan R., Zingales L. (1998). Financial dependence and growth. American Economic Review. Vol. 88. No. 3. P. 559–586.
30. Repullo R., Suarez J. (2013). The Procyclical Effects of Bank Capital Regulation. The Review of Financial Studies. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 452–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs118
31. Rogers J., Scotti C., Wright J. (2014). Evaluating Asset-Market Effects of Unconventional Monetary Policy: A Cross-Country Comparison. International Finance Discussions Papers. No. 1101. March. 65 p.
32. Taylor J.B. (2009). The financial crisis and the policy responses: An empirical analysis of what went wrong. NBER Working Paper Series. No. 14631. 32 p.
33. Yi Gang. (2021). China’s Interest Rate System and Market-based Interest Rate Reform. Journal of Financial Research. No. 9. P. 1–15. URL: http://www.pbc.gov.cn/en/3688110/3688172/4157443/4364384/2021102014082914468.pdf (accessed: 01.05.2023).
34. Yudaeva K. (2018). Granitsy monetarnoy politiki: Mirovye tendentsii i rossiyskaya praktika inflyatsionnogo targetirovaniya [Limits of Monetary Policy: Global Trends and Russian Practice of Inflation Targeting]. Finance and Credit. Vol. 77. No. 2. P. 95–100. https://doi.org/10.31477/rjmf.201802.95
35. Zamaraev B.A., Kiyuzevskaya A.M. (2019). Inflyatsionnoye targetirovaniye v mire i Rossii [Inflation targeting in the world economy and in Russia]. Voprosi ekonomiki. No. 6. P. 5–29. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-6-5-29
Review
For citations:
Panova G., Larionova I., Shuba N. The Dilemma of Ensuring Financial Stability and Stimulating Growth of the Russian Economy. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2024;22(2):95-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/IT.2024.22.2.77.5