Preview

International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy

Advanced search

Information Components of Soft Power: Communicative Aspects

https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2019.17.1.56.4

Abstract

The article considers communicative potential of information components of soft power given the development of new information and communication technologies and forms of mass communication. Conceptual-analytical and communicative-technological approaches to the study of soft power as a system of resources and instruments of foreign policy are identified, as well as the inverse character of soft power technologies is demonstrated. The structural analysis of the information component of soft power, which is actively used by political and international structures to achieve their aims and respond quickly to challenges and threats in a global networked society, is carried out. The author's interpretation of the information component of soft power, which is considered to be a a set of information strategies, technologies and products used in the information space for realizing specific goals related to the political interests of soft power subject is suggested. Comparative analysis of rating models of soft power is carried out with due regard to the role of information in these analytical instruments. As an integral and systemforming element of the information structure of soft power, a media discourse is analyzed. When considering the main information components of soft power, separate network technologies and social media are allocated: technology of smart mob, fake discourses, instant mobile communication services (messengers). Under conditions of digitalization of international processes, messengers become a major channel of communication and the information resource aimed at formatting public opinion and coordination of groups. In conclusion, the authors determine that the inverse nature of the information components of soft power is manifested in its contradictory strategic attitudes. On the one hand, a media discourse of a soft power is aimed at fulfilling a consolidating function among the participants in the communicative process. On the other, media discourse is employed for implementation of destructive strategies related to the hidden manipulative influence on mass consciousness, using confrontationallyoriented technologies. It is noted that the development of digital technologies leads to create of new information types of soft power, such as digital culture, digital diplomacy, digital management, digital electoral system. Under conditions of the global informatization of society, the process of integrating network technologies, new and social media is being implemented, and their adaptability to new realities is being intensified, which ultimately leads to an increase in the mobility of the structural components of soft power, and to an increase in their synergistic effect.

About the Authors

Olga Rusakova
Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the RAS
Russian Federation

Prof. Dr Olga Rusakova - Head, Philosophy Division, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Ekaterinburg 620990



Ekaterina Gribovod
Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the RAS
Russian Federation

Dr Ekaterina Gribovod - Junior Researcher, Institute of Philosophy and Law,
Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Ekaterinburg 620990



References

1. Davydov Yu.P. (2004). Ponyatie “zhyostkoj” i “myagkoj” sily v teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij [The Notion of “Hard” and “Soft” Power in Theory of International Relations]. Mezhdunarodnye processy. Vol. 2. No. 4. P. 69–80.

2. Dyakova E.G. (2014). Soft power kak projavlenie “administrativnoj mody” (na primere formirovanija jelektronnogo pravitel'stva v Kitae) [Soft Power as a Manifestation of “Administrative Fashion” (Using the Example of China E-government)]. Nauchnyj zhurnal “Diskurs-Pi”. No. 4 (17). P. 43–47.

3. Gallarotti G. (2011). Soft Power: What it is, Why It's Important, and the Conditions Under Which it Can Be Effectively Used. Journal of Political Power. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 25–47.

4. Goloshubina O.K. (2015). Razgovor v messendzhere kak specificheskij zhanr internet-kommunikacii [Conversation in the Messenger as a Specific Genre of Internet Communication]. Vestnik OmGU. No. 1. P. 208–212.

5. Gribovod E.G. (2016). Mediatizatsiya politiki kak strategicheskij resurs politicheskikh kommunikacij [The mediatization of politics as a strategic resource of political communications]. Nauka Krasnoyarya. No. 6. P. 48–57.

6. Hall T. (2010). An Unclear Attraction: A Critical Examination of Soft Power as an Analytical Category. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. No. 3. P. 189–211.

7. Holyk G.G. (2011). Paper Tiger? Chinese Soft power in East Asia. Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 126. No.2. P. 223–254.

8. Kapicyn V.M. (2014). Semioticheskie resursy i politicheskaya kul'tura [Semiotic resources and political culture]. Nauchnyj rezul'tat. Series Social'nye i gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Vol. 1. No. 1(1). P. 33–45.

9. Kharkevich M.V. (2014). “Myagkaya sila”: politicheskoe ispol`zovanie nauchnoj konceptsii [Soft Power: Political Use of a Scholarly Concept]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. No. 2 (35). P. 22–29.

10. Kovba D.M. (2017). Osnovny`e podkhody` k issledovaniyu “myagkoj sily`” v otechestvennoj politicheskoj nauke [The Main Approaches to the Study of Soft Power in the Domestic Political Science]. Nauchnyj zhurnal “Diskurs-Pi”. No. 1(26). P. 143–148.

11. Leonova O.G. (2015). Interpretaciya ponyatiya “myagkaya sila” v nauke [Approaches to the Analysis of “Soft Power” in the Russian Political Science]. Nauchno-analiticheskij zhurnal “Obozrevatel’ – Observer”. No. 2 (301). P. 80–89.

12. Mattern J.B. (2005). Why soft power isn’t so soft: representational force and the sociolinguistic construction of attraction in world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. Vol. 33. No. 3. P. 583–612.

13. Melissen J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 221 p.

14. Naumov A.O. (2016). «Myagkaya sila», «cvetnye revolyucii» i tekhnologii smeny politicheskih rezhimov v nachale XXI veka. [Soft power, color revolutions and technologies for changing political regimes at the beginning of the XXI century]. Moscow: ARGAMAK-MEDIA. 274 p.

15. Nossel S. (2004). Smart Power. Foreign Affairs. Vol. 83. No. 2. P. 131–142.

16. Nye J. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs. 208 p.

17. Nye J. (2010). The Future of power. New York: Public Affairs. 320 p.

18. Panova E. P. (2010). Sila privlekatel`nosti: ispol`zovanie «myagkoj vlasti» v mirovoj politike [The Power of Attraction: The Use of “Soft Power” in World Politics]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. No. 4 (13). P. 91–97.

19. Parshin P.B. (2014). Dva ponimaniya “myagkoj sily'”: predposy`lki, korrelyaty` i sledstviya [Two Understandings of “Soft Power”: Prerequisites, Correlates and Consequences]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. № 2 (35): 14–21.

20. Reingold G. (2006). Umnaya tolpa: novaya social'naya revolyuciya [Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution]. Moscow: FAIR PRESS. 416 p.

21. Roselle L., Miskimmon A., O‘Loughlin B. (2014). Strategic narrative: a new means to understand soft power. Media, War & Conflict. Vol. 7(1). P. 70–84.

22. Rusakov V.M. (2017). Myagkaya sila voennoj moshhi [Soft Power of Military Power]. Nauchnyj zhurnal “Diskurs-Pi”. No. 3–4 (28-29). P. 96–107.

23. Rusakova O.F. (ed.) (2015). Soft power: teorija, resursy, diskurs [Soft Power: Theory, Resources, Discourse]. Ekaterinburg: Diskurs-Pi. 376 p.

24. Rusakova O.F., Gribovod E.G. (2014). Politicheskij mediadiskurs i mediatizaciya politiki kak kontsepty politicheskoj kommunikativistiki [Political Media Discourse and Mediatization of Politics as Concept of Political Communicativistics]. Nauchnyj ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural'skogo otdeleniya Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Vol. 14. Issue 4. P. 65–77.

25. Rusakova O.F., Kovaleva D.M. (2013). «Myagkaya sila» i «umnaya vlast'»: kontseptual'nyj analiz [“Soft Power” and “Smart Power”: Conceptual Analysis]. Socium i vlast'. No. 3. P. 15–19.

26. Trahtenberg A.D. (2007). Internet i vozrozhdenie “publichnoj sfery”: habermasianskij ideal i real'nost' Runeta [Internet and the Revival of the "Public Sphere": the Habermas Ideal and the Reality of the Runet]. Nauchnyj ezhegodnik instituta filosofii i prava Ural'skogo otdeleniya Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Vol. 7. P. 224–230.

27. Vuving A.L. (2009). How soft power works. Toronto. 20 p.

28. Wilson E.J. (2008). Hard Power, Soft Power, Smart Power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Vol. 616. Issue 1. P.110–124.

29. Yudin N.V. (2015). Sistemnoe prochtenie fenomena myagkoj sily [Systemic reading of “soft power” phenomena]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 96–105.


Review

For citations:


Rusakova O., Gribovod E. Information Components of Soft Power: Communicative Aspects. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2019;17(1):62-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2019.17.1.56.4

Views: 24


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-2756 (Print)
ISSN 1811-2773 (Online)