Preview

Lorenz Butterfly and Uprising Supranationality Spiral

https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2019.17.1.56.8

Abstract

Traditional negative connotation of the term “crisis” narrows down scholarly perspective with a relatively rigid framework, which tends to overlook the constructive effects of critical development points. The use of synergetic methodology to deconstruct and redefine the term “crisis” to include ambivalent as well as positive effects into the whole picture may serve as one of the possible ways to address and partly remedy this problem. Such methodology is focused on the self-regulation and self-organization of complex systems. It draws on the observation that processes in various unrelated fields could follow the same logical structure. This article is aimed at applying synergetics to the analysis of two integration shocks: refugee crisis of the Schengen area and sovereign debt crisis of the Eurozone. It presents comparative analysis of the EU’s responses to crises and gives ground for the following set of conclusions. European integration process develops along “the uprising supranationality spiral”. The movement up and down along the spiral is possible due to the thermostat effect. This effect explains both why the EU's pro-integration response to crises may go beyond reactive measures and why rapid and intensive authority delegation in its turn spurs popularity of Eurosceptic forces. Fluctuations along the supranationality spiral go in line with the EU’s essential raison d'être: they ensure the maintenance of the system's homeostasis with a set of definite parameters of order. The EU represents a system in the Making between the phases of development and maturity. Considering the cycling of the political materia's states of aggregate, this position provides theoretical ground to talk about the midterm future of the European integration from the standpoint of evolutionary optimism.

About the Author

Anastasia Golofast
Institute of Philosophy of the RAS
Russian Federation

Ms Anastasia Golofast - Doctoral Candidate, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, 109240



References

1. (2001). Time of the world. Structures of History. Novosibirsk: Sibirsky khronograph. 520 p.

2. (2012). Has the European Experiment Failed? The Munk Debate on Europe. The Munk Debates. 104 p.

3. (2016). Internal Border Controls in the Schengen Area: Is Schengen Crisis-Proof? Study for the LIBE Committee, 2016. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/571356/IPOL_ STU(2016)571356_EN.pdf (accessed 06.10.2018).

4. (2017). A European Agenda on Migration. State of Play. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/ homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/20170302_eam_state_of_play_ en.pdf (accessed 06.10.2018).

5. (2017). Regroup and Reform: Ideas for a More Responsive and Effective European Union, CEPS. URL: https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/Regroup%20and%20Reform%20TF%20for%20website.pdf (accessed 05.10.2018).

6. Arshinov V., Budanov V. (2015). Quantum paradigm of complexity: interdisciplinary context. University Book. 121 p.

7. Borodkin L. (2003). Poryadok iz haosa: kontseptsii sinergetiki v metodologii istoricheskikh issledovaniy [Order from Chaos: Concepts of Synergetics in Methodology of History Studies]. Novaya i novejshaya istoriya. No. 2. P. 98–118.

8. Bowles S. (2017). Moral economy. Why Good Incentives are no Substitute for Good Citizens. New Haven: Yale University Press. 288 p.

9. Budanov V. (2006). Metodologiya i printsipy sinergetiki [Methodology and Principles of Synergetics]. Filosofiya osviti. No. 1(3). P. 143–172.

10. Butorina O. (2012). Krizis v zone evro: oshibki ili zakonomernost’? [Eurozone Crisis: Mistakes or Сonsistent Pattern?]. Sovremennaya Evropa. No. 2. P. 82–94.

11. Collier P. (2013). Exodus. How Migration is Changing Our World. Oxford University Press, 2013. 309 p.

12. Davis Cross M. (2014). Crisis & Catharsis in EU Integration. 5th International Conference on Democracy as Idea and Practice, EUSA conference paper.

13. Dean M. (2010). Governmentality, New York: Sage Publications. 304 p.

14. Degterev D., Istomin I. (2015). Sistemnoye modelirovaniye mezhdunarodnych otnosheniy [System modelling of international relations]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. No. 11. P. 17–30.

15. Dekalchuk A. (2016). Arabskaya vesna i reforma Shengena [EU Immigration Laws and the Wake of Arab Spring]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 14. No. 4 (47). P. 80–98.

16. Edmonds D. (2013). Would You Kill the Fat Man? The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us about Right and Wrong. Princeton University Press. 220 p.

17. Giddens A. (2014). Turbulent and Mighty Continent. What Future for Europe? Polity. 224 p.

18. Jaspers K. (2016). The Origin and Goal of History. London: Routledge. 314 p.

19. Kraus P. (2008). A Union of Diversity: Language, Identity and Polity-Building in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 246 p.

20. Luhmann N. (2000). Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. In Gambetta, Diego (ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Department of Sociology, Univesity of Oxford. P. 94–107.

21. Malinetskiy G. (2012). Sinergetika – ot proshlogo k buduschemu [Synergetics –from the Past to the Future]. Modelirovanie i analiz informatsionnykh sistem. Keldysh Institute RAS, No. 3. P. 5–31.

22. Potemkina O. (2016). Vyshegradskaya gruppa i gibkaya solidarnost’ [Visegrad Group and Flexible Solidarity]. Sovremennaya Evropa. №6. P. 43–52.

23. Potemkina O., Paukova Yu. (2016). Schengen skoreye zhiv chem mertv? [Schengen: Rather Alive or Approaching Death?]. Valdai Discussion Club Report. URL: http://ru.valdaiclub.com/files/12979/ (accessed 05.10.2018)

24. Sapronov M. (2002). Sinergeticheskiy podhod v istoricheskih issledovaniyah: novye vozmozhnosti i trudnosti primeneniya [Synergetic Approach in Studying History: New Opportunities and Application Difficulties]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. No. 4. P. 55–69.

25. Schelling T. (2006). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. London, W.W.Norton & Company. 272 p.

26. (2000). Synergetics. Proceedings of the roundtable “Self-organization and complex systems studies: ideas, approaches and prospects”. Moscow State University Press. 368 p.

27. Taleb N. (2012). Antifragile. Things That Gain from Disorder. London: Penguin. 544 p.

28. Temnikov D. (2009). Sinergeticheskiy podhod k analizu mezhdunarodnoy politiki: opyt adaptatsii ponyatiy [Synergetic Approach to the Analysis of World Politics: The Experience of Adopting Concepts]. Mezhdunarodnye Protsessy. No. 2. P. 83–94.

29. Vengerov A. (1993). Sinergetika i politika [Synergetics and Politics]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. No. 4. P. 55–69.

30. Wolf M. (2016). The Shifts and the Shocks: What We've Learned-and Have Still to Learn-from the Financial Crisis. London: Penguin Books. 528 p.


Review

For citations:


Golofast A. Lorenz Butterfly and Uprising Supranationality Spiral. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2019;17(1):114-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2019.17.1.56.8

Views: 35


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-2756 (Print)
ISSN 1811-2773 (Online)