Strategic Partnership between the EU and Japan
https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2018.16.1.52.9
Abstract
The article is focused on the concept of “strategic partnership” and its usage in regard to the EU-Japan relations. This term is widely used both in the European and Japanese political practice and was originally introduced to characterize bilateral relations in 2002. On July 18th, 2018 the two sides signed the Strategic Partnership Agreement, which fixes the usage of this term in the legally binding document. However, the term is vague and still has no commonly accepted definition. Research in Japanese and European foreign policy narrative on the “strategic partnership” issue showed that no definition of this term is needed: each specific “strategic partnership” is unique in nature and is named as such for a specific purpose. Employing this approach allowed to finding out what meaning Japanese and European sides imply when naming their relations “strategic” and for what purpose they have been using it so far. The conclusion the author comes to is that the European Union plays the leading role in using the rhetoric of strategic partnerships and applies it in two dimensions. The first, ideological one, implies, that Brussels is striving to spread the rules and norms it shares through interaction with its strategic partners, who are characterized by considerable economic and political weight. Japan is an important like-minded partner of the EU in this regard. The other, pragmatic dimension involves strategic partnership as an instrument for development of informal trust-based relations, which allows the EU to resolve disputes with its strategic partners more effectively. In case of EU-Japan cooperation the problem of lifting European embargo on arms supply to China was a challenge for EU-Japan strategic partnership, which finally ended up with keeping embargo valid and strategic partnership safe. Tokyo, according to the author’s findings, doesn’t have its own structured view on the usage of the strategic partnership concept and applies this term, among others, to the partners not playing a truly strategic role for Japanese diplomacy. Engaging with Brussels, Tokyo, however, fully accepts the rhetoric it practices.
About the Author
Mariya ChizhevskayaRussian Federation
Ms Mariya Chizhevskaya - Doctoral Candidate, Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciences
Moscow 125009
References
1. Berkofsky A. (2012). EU-Japan Relations from 2001 to today: achievements, failures and prospects. Japan Forum. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 265–288.
2. Blanco L.F. (2016). The functions of ‘strategic partnerships’ in European Union foreign policy discourse. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 36–54.
3. Cirlig C.C. (2012). EU Strategic Partnerships with third countries. Library Briefing. Library of the European Parliament. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/bibliotheque/briefing/2012/ 120354/LDM_BRI%282012%29120354_REV1_EN.pdf
4. Chizhevskaya M. (2017). Rezhim svobodnoj torgovli: interesy i opaseniya ES i Yaponii [Free trade regime: interests and concerns of the EU and Japan]. Sovremennaya Evropa. No. 3 (75). P. 72–79.
5. Diez T. (2013). Normative Power as Hegemony. Cooperation and Conflict. Vol. 48. No. 2. P. 194–210.
6. Gilson J. (2016). The Strategic Partnership Agreement between the EU and Japan: the pitfalls of path dependency? Journal of European Integration. Vol. 38. No. 7. P. 791–806.
7. Gratius S. (2011). The EU and the "special ten". FRIDE Policy Brief. No. 76. URL: http://fride.org/ download/PB_76_Strategic_Partnerships_Eng.pdf
8. Grevi G. (2010). Making EU strategic partnerships effective. FRIDE Working Paper. No. 105. URL: http:// fride.org/publication/875/making-eu-strategic-partnerships-effective
9. Hess N.M. (2012). EU Relations with “Emerging” Strategic Partners: Brazil, India and South Africa. German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA) Focus International Edition. No. 4. URL: https:// www.giga-hamburg.de/de/system/files/publications/gf_international_1204.pdf
10. Kay S. (2000). What Is a Strategic Partnership? Problems of Post-Communism. Vol. 47. No. 3. P. 15–24.
11. Morii A. (2015). Dialogue without Cooperation? Diplomatic Implications of EU-Japan Summits. Asia Europe Journal. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 413–424.
12. Nosov M. (2015). Yaponiya–ES [Japan-European Union]. In: Gromyko Al.A., Nosov M. (eds) Evropeiskii soyuz v poiske global'noi roli: politika, ekonomika, bezopasnost'. Moscow: Ves' mir. P. 288–305.
13. Novikov I. (2010). Strategicheskoe partnerstvo kak fenomen mirovoi politiki (analiz otnoshenii RossiyaEvrosoyuz) [Strategic partnership as a phenomenon of international politics (evaluation of the relations between Russia and the EU)]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. No. 1 (17). P. 117–124.
14. Renard T. (2010). Strategy wanted: The European Union and Strategic Partnerships. Egmont Security Policy Brief. No. 13. URL: http://www.egmontinstitute.be/strategy-wanted-the-european-union-andstrategic-partnerships/
15. Renard T., Hooijmaaijers B. (2011). Assessing the EU’s Strategic Partnerships in the UN System.
16. Egmont Security Policy Brief. No. 24. URL: http://www.egmontinstitute.be/wp-content/uploads/ 2013/09/SPB24-RenardHooimaaijers.pdf
17. Tyszkiewicz R. (2013). Towards new political and economic agreements with Japan: bringing new dynamism into the strategic partnership between EU and Japan. Policy Paper of Polish Institute of
18. International Affairs. No. 9 (57). URL: https://www.pism.pl/files/?id_plik=13357
Review
For citations:
Chizhevskaya M. Strategic Partnership between the EU and Japan. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2018;16(1):105-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2018.16.1.52.9