Science and Innovations in International Relations Theories

The article addresses the role of technological innovations in the theoretical discourse on international relations. The role of science and technology in global development is forever increasing, and it is important to reflect its impact on political interactions. The author examines multiple approaches to this issue by traditional and current political theories and paradigms. He seeks to determine the degree of conceptual sufficiency or insufficiency of established academic approaches for understanding the role of science and innovation in international relations as a systemic social and political phenomenon. It also seeks to disclose more promising theoretical frameworks. The author argues that realist and liberal paradigms (due to their technological determinism), as well as social constructivism (due to its social and cultural determinism), are conceptually fragile for understanding the systemic role that science and technology play in global political transformations. While realists study the effect of scientific and technological development on the distribution of capabilities among actors, liberals identify it as a source of systemic innovations, leading to the rise of new types of actors and themes in international politics. On the contrary, constructivists focus on the socially defined nature of technological development and its dependence on existing norms and on the values of their creators. The importance of scientific innovations is undetermined. The author also presents the findings of the Science, Technology and Society studies, which emerged as an interdisciplinary field of research of interrelations between social systems. However, the agenda of international politics remains on the sidelines of this research program. Due to the gaps in the previous theoretical frameworks, the author outlines prospects for more prolific consideration of the problem through further development of the interdisciplinary research field and the complexity theory as applied to international processes.

1. Adler E. (1986). Ideological “Guerrillas” and the Quest for Technological Autonomy: Brazil’s Domestic

2. Computer Industry. International Organization. No. 40: 675–705. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300027314

3. Adler E. (1997). Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations. No. 3: 319–363. DOI: 10.1177/1354066197003003003 Angell N. (1912). The Great Illusion. N.Y.: Arno. 335 p.

4. Aron R. (1959). La Soci t industrielle et la Guerre. Paris. 408 p.

5. Aron R. (1966). Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. N.Y.: Double Day. 820 p.

6. Axelrod R. M. (1997). The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 258 p.

7. Bogaturov A.D. (2006). Liderstvo I detsentralizatsiya v mezhdunarodnoy susteme [Leadership and Decent ralization in the International Syatem]. Mezhdunarodniye protsessi [International Trends]. Vol. 4. No. 12: 5–15.

8. Bousquet A., Curtis S. (2011). Beyond Models and Metaphors: Complexity Theory, Systems Thinking and International Relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. Vol. 24. No. 1: 43–62.

9. Castells M. (2000). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Part 1: The Rise of Network Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers. 556 p.

10. Cutler R.M. (2002). Complexity Science and Knowledge Creation in International Relations Theory. In: Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. Oxford: EOLSS Publishers for UNESCO. 27 p. Available at: http://www.robertcutler.org/download/pdf/en02eolx.pdf (accessed: 10.11.2013)

11. Deudney D. (1993). Dividing Realism: Structural Realism versus Security Materialism on Nuclear Security and Proliferation. Security Studies. Vol. 2. No. 3/4: 8–36. DOI: 10.1080/09636419309347518

12. Duedney D. (1995). Nuclear Weapons and the Waning of the Real-State. Daedalus. Vol. 124. No. 2: 209–231. Fukuyama F. (2007). Konets istorii I poslidnii chelovek [The End of History and the Last Man]. M.: AST. 588 p.

13. Gilpin R. (1975). U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation. N.Y.: Basic Books. 291 p.

14. Gilpin R. (1987). The Political Economy of International Relations. N.J.: Princeton University Press. 472 p.

15. Gilpin R. (2002). The Challenge of Global Capitalism. N.Y.: Princeton University Press. 408 p.

16. Held D., McGrew A., Goldblatt D., Perraton A. (1999). Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press. 540 p.

17. Harrison N.E. (ed.) (2006). Complexity in World Politics: Concepts and Methods of a New Paradigm. N.Y.: State University of New York Press. 220 p.

18. Herrera G.L. (2006). Technology and International Transformation: The Railroad, the Atom Bomb, and the Politics of Technological Change. Albany: State University of New York Press. 265 p.

19. Hughes T.P. (1987). The Evolution of Large Technological Systems. In: Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. W. Bijker, T.P. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds.). Cambridge: MIT Press: 52–81.

20. Hughes T.P. (1980). The Order of the Technological World. History of Technology. Vol. 5: 1–16.

21. Jones B. (2000). The World Turned Upside Down? Globalization and the Future of the State. Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press. 314 p.

22. Kavalski E. (2007). The Fifth Debate and the Emergence of Complex International Relations Theory: Notes on the Application of Complexity Theory to the Study of International Life. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. Vol. 20. No. 3: 435–454. DOI: 10.1080/09557570701574154

23. Keohane R., Nye J. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. 261 p.

24. Keohane R., Nye J. (1971). Transnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 148 p.

25. Krutskih A.V., Zinovieva E.S. (2014). Novoye litso mirovoy politiki [The New Face of World Politics] – Mezhdunarodniye protsessi [International Trends]. Vol. 12. No. 36–37: 20–32.

26. Morgenthau H. (1961). Western Values and Total War. Commentary. No. 32: 277–297.

27. Ohmae K. (1995). The Rise of the Region State. Foreign Affairs. No. 72: 78–87.

28. Palan R., Abbott J., Deans P. (1996). State Strategies in the Global Political Economy. London: Pinter. 311 p.

29. Rosecrance R. (1986). The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. N.Y.: Basic Books. 268 p.

30. Rosecrance R. (1999). The Rise of the Virtual State: Wealth and Power in the Coming Century. N.Y.: Basic Books. 287 p.

31. Rosenau J. (1990). Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. 504 p.

32. Rosenau J. (1997). Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 467 p.

33. Rosenau J. (2003). Distant Proximities: Dynamics beyond Globalization. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. 456 p.

34. Ruggie J. (1975). International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends. International Organization. No. 29: 557–583. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300031696

35. Shaw M. (2000). Theory of the Global State: Globality as Unfinished Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 316 p.

36. Strange S. (1994). States and Markets. London: Pinter. 266 p.

37. Strange S. (1996). The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 235 p.

38. Waltz K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. MA: Addison-Wesley. 256 p.

39. Weiss L. (1998). The Myth of the Powerless State. N.Y.: Cornell University Press. 256 p.

40. Wendt A. (1995). Constructing International Politics. International Security. No. 20: 71–81. DOI:

41. 2307/2539217

42. Wendt A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 447 p.

43. Zinovieva E.S., Kazantsev A.A. (2015). Slozhnost’ mirovoy politiki: k voprosu o novoy metodologii analiza [Complexity of World Politics: On the Issue of New Analytical Methodology]. Mirovaya ekonomika I mezhdunarodniye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations]. No. 4: 58–67.