Preview

International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy

Advanced search

CLIMATE AND LAW. HOW TO FORMULATE AN ATTRACTIVE IMAGE OF A FAIR “GREEN FUTURE”

https://doi.org/10.46272/IT.2025.23.1.80.3

Abstract

The article examines the legal and political aspects of the concept of a “green future” for humanity, which should guide the international climate protection regime. The first part of the article systematizes the conclusions made by the International Court of Justice in its 2025 advisory opinion on the international legal climate obligations of states. The second part, based on an analysis of decisions under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, reveals the current status of the international legal climate protection regime. It concludes that over the past five years, the global climate protection regime has been reformed according to a “green energy revolution” scenario, which implies an accelerated transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources. As a result of this reform, the thesis of the climate unacceptability of all types of fossil fuels has been established at the global intergovernmental level, a position confirmed by the International Court of Justice. The Court’s opinion reflects an emerging presumption of illegality regarding activities related to the financing, exploration, development, and consumption of hydrocarbon resources. The third part of the article proposes a model for a comprehensive integrated assessment of the sustainability and security of the “green transition,” within which the risks and challenges of the “green energy revolution” scenario are analyzed, and possible alternative scenarios are explored.

About the Authors

IVAN GUDKOV
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Moscow, 119454



MARK ENTIN
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Moscow, 119454



References

1. Bataille C., Khourdajie A., Coninck H., Kleijne K., Nilsson L., Bashmakov I., Davis S., Fennell P. (2025) Defining ‘abated’ fossil fuel and industrial process emissions // Energy and Climate Change. Vol. 6. 11 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100203

2. Crowley-Vigneau A., Kalyuzhnova Y., Ketenci N. (2023) What motivates the ‘green’ transition: Russian and European perspectives // Resources Policy. Vol. 81. No. 103129. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103128

3. Fyock C. (2022) What Might Degrowth Mean for International Economic Law? A Necessary Alternative to the (Un)Sustainable Development Paradigm // Asian Journal of International Law. Vol. 12. No 1. P. 40–62. DOI: 10.1017/s2044251322000030

4. Gudkov I.V. (2023) «Klimaticheskiy prigovor» iskopaemomu toplivu: okonchatel'nyy i obzhalovaniyu ne podlezhit? [A Climate Verdict on Fossil Fuels: Final and Not Subject to Appeal?] // Energy Policy Journal. No. 12. P. 46–59. DOI: 10.46920/2409-5516_2023_12191_46

5. Gudkov I.V. (2024) Energeticheskiy perekhod i pravo: klimat, torgovlya, investitsii [Energy Transition and Law: Climate, Trade, Investment]. Moscow: MGIMO-University Publishing House. 393 p.

6. Gudkov I.V., Entin M.L. (2025) Unilateral “Anti-Russian” Sanctions: How to Strengthen the Response // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. Vol. 21. No. 3. DOI: 10.61205/S199132220034841-1

7. Gudkov I.V., Entin M.L. (2025) Obyazatel'stva gosudarstv po zashchite klimata: konsul'tativnoe zaklyuchenie Mezhdunarodnogo suda OON [Obligations of States to Protect the Climate: Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice] // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. No. 5.

8. Heffron R. (2022) Energy Law in Crisis: An Energy Justice Revolution Needed // Journal of World Energy Law and Business. Vol. 15. № 3. P. 167–172. DOI: 10.1093/jwelb/jwac012

9. Hickel J., Slamersak A. (2022) Existing climate mitigation scenarios perpetuate colonial inequalities // Lancet Planet Health. Vol. 6. № 7. P. e628-e631. DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00092-4.

10. Mastini R., Kallis G., Hickel J. (2021) A Green New Deal without growth? // Ecological Economics. Vol. 179. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106832

11. Mauger R. (2023) Finding a needle in a haystack? Identifying degrowth-compatible provisions in EU energy law for a just transition to net-zero by 2050 // Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law. Vol. 41. No 2. Р. 175-193. DOI: 10.1080/02646811.2023.2187549.


Review

For citations:


GUDKOV I., ENTIN M. CLIMATE AND LAW. HOW TO FORMULATE AN ATTRACTIVE IMAGE OF A FAIR “GREEN FUTURE”. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/IT.2025.23.1.80.3

Views: 16


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-2756 (Print)
ISSN 1811-2773 (Online)