Economic development and internal sovereignty of Transnistria and Abkhazia. 30 years of de-facto independence

For more than 30 years, Transnistria and Abkhazia separated from their parent states and proclaimed independence. Generations born and raised in unrecognized states have already entered an active age. In this regard, the question of how citizens of the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic and the Republic of Abkhazia understand independence, how important it is for them, how do they see the prospects of their states and what life strategies do they choose, becomes especially relevant. In the article, the authors compare the results of 13 focus groups conducted in Transnistria and Abkhazia in the fall of 2020 with the main socio-economic indicators of de facto states and their neighbors. This approach made it possible to connect the perception of the problems of everyday life with changes in the identity of citizens and the internal sovereignty of unrecognized states, to highlight the factors uniting and dividing various social groups, to assess their attitude to the current results and prospects of state building. The different composition of the groups made it possible to compare the opinions, firstly, of citizens who were socialized after the collapse of the Soviet Union and in Soviet times, secondly, different ethnic groups, men and women, and, thirdly, residents of different districts of de-facto states. It was revealed that the main economic indicators of Abkhazia and Transnistria lag behind the average values of neighboring countries. The lack of significant economic progress can potentially affect the loyalty of citizens to the political regime and negatively change the viability of the republics. In this context, signs of fatigue from the inconveniences of life in the unrecognized republic and low-income levels compared to neighboring countries and the mother state were revealed in the Abkhaz and Transnistrian societies.

1. (2017). Assessment of the potential for sustainable development of small towns in the Dniester River valley. Kishinev. 72 p.

2. (2019). Regiony Rossii 2019 [Regions of Russia 2019]. Moscow: Rosstat. 1204 p.

3. (2019). Statistical yearbook 2019. Tiraspol. 183 p.

4. (2019). Statistical Yearbook of Georgia: 2019. Tbilisi: National Statistics Office of Georgia. 290 p.

5. (2020). Abkhazia in Numbers 2019. State Statistics Committee of the Republic of Abkhazia. 157 p.

6. (2020). Moldovei statistica teritoriala 2019. National de Statistica al Republicii Moldova. 186 p.

7. (2020). Statistical publication Regions of Ukraine 2019. Kyiv. Part I. 270 p.

8. Bakke K., Linke A., O'Loughlin J., Toal G. (2018). Dynamics of state-building after war: External-internal relations in Eurasian de facto states. Political Geography. Vol. 63. No. 1. P. 159–173.

9. Berg E., Mölder M. (2012). Who is entitled to ‘earn sovereignty’? Legitimacy and regime support in Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh. Nations and Nationalism. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 527–545.

10. Berg E., Pegg S. (2020). Do Parent State Strategies Matter in Resolving Secessionist Conflicts with De Facto States? In R. Griffiths and D. Muro, (eds) Strategies of Secession and Counter-Secession. London: ECPR Press. Р. 52–68.

11. Berg E., Vits K. (2018). The Do-or-Die Dilemma Facing Post-Soviet De Facto States. Ponars Euarasia–Policy Memos. P. 1–5.

12. Berg E., Vits K. (2018). Quest for Survival and Recognition: Insights into the Foreign Policy Endeavours of the Post-Soviet de facto States. Ethnopolitics. Vol. 17. No. 3. P. 1–18.

13. Berg E., Vits K. (2022) Transnistria’s European Drive: A Means to What End? // Geopolitics. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 852–874.

14. Blakkisrud H., Kemoklidze N., Gelashvili T., Kolstø P. (2021). Navigating de facto statehood: trade, trust, and agency in Abkhazia’s external economic relations. Eurasian Geography and Economics. Vol. 62. No. 3. P. 347–371.

15. Bolshakov A.G. (2008). “Zamorozhennye konflikty” postsovetskogo prostranstva: tupiki mezhdunarodnogo mirotvorchestva ["Frozen conflicts" of the post-Soviet space: Dead Ends of International Peacemaking]. Politiya. No. 1. P. 27–37.

16. Broers L. (2013). Recognising politics in unrecognised states: 20 years of enquiry into the de facto states of the South Caucasus. Caucasus Survey. Vol. 1. P. 59–74.

17. Caspersen N. (2012). Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System. MA: Polity. 210 p.

18. Caspersen N. (2017). Making Peace with De Facto States. In Riegl M., Doboš B. (eds) Unrecognized States and Secession in the 21st Century. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. P. 11–22.

19. Caspersen N. (2018). Recognition, Status Quo or Reintegration: Engagement with de facto States. Ethnopolitics. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2018.14953601-18.

20. Dembinska M. (2018). Carving out the nation with the enemy's kin: double strategy of boundary-making in Transnistria and Abkhazia. Nations and Nationalism. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 298–317.

21. Dembinska M., Campana A. (2017). Frozen Conflicts and Internal Dynamics of De Facto States: Perspectives and Directions for Research. International Studies Review. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 254–278.

22. Dembińska M. (2021). La fabrique des États de facto. Ni guerre ni paix. Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal. 295 p.

23. Fabry M. (2017). Unrecognized States and National Identity. In Riegl M., Doboš B. (eds) Unrecognized States and Secession in the 21st Century. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. P. 23–34.

24. Grant T. D. (2017). Frozen Conflicts and International Law. Cornell International Law Journal. Vol. 50. No. 3. Article 1. Available at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol50/iss3/1 (accessed: 22.09.2021).

25. Hoch T. (2018). Legitimization of Statehood and its Impact on Foreign Policy in De Facto States: A Case Study of Abkhazia. Iran and the Caucasus. Vol. 22. No. 4. P. 382–402

26. Kolosov V., O’Loughlin J. (1999). Pseudo-States as Harbingers of a New Geopolitics: The Example of the Trans-Dniester Moldovan Republic (TMR). Geopolitics. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 151–176.

27. Kolosov V., Zotova M. (2021). «De-Facto Borders» as a Mirror of Sovereignty. The Case of the Post-Soviet Non-Recognized States. Historical Social Research. Vol. 46. No. 3. P. 178–207.

28. Kolosov V.A., Crivenco A.V. (2021). Vliyanie depopuliatsii na politicheskuiu zhizn' i legitimnost' nepriznannykh gosudarstv (na primere Pridnestrov'ya) [Depopulation as a Factor in the Legitimacy of Unrecognized States (on the example of Transnistria)]. Izvestia RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya. Vol. 85. No. 2. P. 205–217.

29. Kolosov V.A., Sebentsov A.B., Turov N.L. (2021). Nekontroliruemye territorii v sovremennom mire: teoriia, genezis, tipy, dinamika [Uncontrolled territories in the contemporary world: theory, genesis, types, dynamics]. Kontury global'nykh transformatsij: politika, ekonomika, parvo. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 23–51.

30. Kolosov V.A., Zayats D.V. (2001). Moldova i Pridnestrov'e: natsional'noe stroitel'stvo, territorial'nye identichnosti, perspektivy razresheniia konflikta [Moldova and Transnistria: Nation-Building, Territorial Identities, Prospects for Conflict Resolution]. Vestnik Evrazii. No. 1. P. 88–122.

31. Kolstø P. (2006). The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States. Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 43. No. 6. P. 723–740.

32. Levinson A. (2006). Otkrytye gruppovye diskussii kak metod prikladnykh sotsiologicheskikh issledovanii [Open Group Discussions as a Method of Applied Sociological Research]. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniia. 2007. No. 6 (92). P. 45–54.

33. Markedonov S. (2012). De-fakto obrazovaniia postsovetskogo prostranstva: dvadtsat' let gosudarstvennogo stroitel'stva [De Facto States in the Post-Soviet Space]. Analiticheskie doklady Instituta Kavkaza. No. 5. 180 p.

34. Markedonov S.M. (2021). Postsovetskie de-fakto gosudarstva: traektorii bor'by za suverenitet [Post-soviet de facto states: trajectories of their struggle for sovereignty]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Vol. 65. No. 12. P. 79–89. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-12-79-89.

35. Markedonov S., Okunev I. (2020). Celostnost' i samoopredelenie gosudarstv v mire problemnoj suverennosti [State Integrity and Self-Determination in a World of Problematic Sovereignty]. Quaestio Rossica. Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 1422–1436. DOI: 10.15826/qr.2020.4.536.

36. Minakov M., Sasse G., Isachenko D. (2021). Post-Soviet Secessionism. Introductory Remarks. In Minakov M., Sasse G. and Isachenko D. (eds) Post-Soviet Secessionism. Nation-Building and State-Failure after Communism. Ibidem Ferlag. P. 7–14.

37. Ó Beacháin D. (2019). Cheque-mates? Abkhazia's quest for international recognition. Studies of Transition States and Societies. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 55–76.

38. O’Loughlin J., Kolosov V, Toal G. (2014). Inside the post-Soviet de facto states: a comparison of attitudes in Abkhazia, Nagorny Karabakh, South Ossetia, and Transnistria. Eurasian Geography and Economics. Vol. 55(5). P. 423–456.

39. O'Loughlin J., Toal, G. Kolosov V. (2017). Who identifies with the “Russian World”? Geopolitical attitudes in southeastern Ukraine, Crimea, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transnistria. Eurasian Geography and Economics. No. 57(6). P. 1–34.

40. Pegg S. (1998). International Society and the De Facto State. Aldershot: Ashgate. 326 p.

41. Pegg S. (2017). Twenty Years of de facto State Studies: Progress, Problems, and Prospects. In:Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 350 p.

42. Sebentsov A., Kolosov V. (2012). Fenomen nekontroliruemykh territorii v sovremennom mire [The phenomenon of uncontrolled territories in the modern world]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. No. 2. P. 31–46.

43. Shesterinina A. (2021) Mobilizing in Uncertainty: Collective Identities and War in Abkhazia. Ithaka (NY): Cornell University Press. 258 p.

44. Stewart D.W., Stamdasani P.N., Rook D.W. (2009). Group Depth Interviews: Focus Group. In L. Bickman, D. J. Rog (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. Los Angeles. SAGE. P. 589–616.

45. Toal G., Merabishvili G. (2019). Borderization Theatre: Geopolitical Entrepreneurship on the South Ossetia Boundary Line, 2008–2018. Caucasus Survey. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 110–133.