The critique of the Westphalian peace narrative
https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2022.20.3.70.3
Abstract
The article studies perceptions of the Peace of Westphalia that were formed in the fields of international relations history and the general theory of international law as a result of conflicting doctrines, with some claiming the Westphalian treaties of 1648 are of universal significance for these scientific fields, and others, conversely, denying that these treaties had any sort of influence on the formation of a modern system of international relations and the formation of international law as a legal system. The article concludes that the treaties of the Peace of Westphalia does not actually contain many of the provisions attributed to them. These norms often arise only from their interpretation. However, the critics of the treaties’ significance for the history of international relations and their international legal regulationwho focused their attention only on the verbatim text of these documents while ignoring the historical conditions surrounding their development and adoption, failed to properly assess their impact. The Westphalian Congress was the first congress in world history that was pan-European in character. Its widely representative nature, the lengthy period of time during which it was held, the content of the treaties and the universally binding nature of their provisions, as well as the protocol rules, allow us to claim that the states of this world region started to identify themselves as part of a single pan-European international community. Moreover, the Congress also saw the creation, in a relatively short time, not only of treaties, but also of customary norms of general international law that were of fundamental importance for the formation of a new system of international relations. Despite the fact that most of the provisions of the Peace Treaty of Westphalia of 1648 havean applied nature, it is by no means an insignificant medieval treaty, the only virtue of which lies in it ending the Thirty Years' War. The Peace of Westphalia is an example of the first pan-European international treaty in world historywhich formulated a number of binding norms for all states of this part of the world. To sum up, the Westphalian Peace Treaty was, a historic breakthrough the creation of treaty norms of general international law, and therefore the it should be deemed a historical milestone in the creation of international law as a legal system.
About the Author
B. I. Nefedov
HSE University, Moscow; MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Boris Nefedov
Moscow, 101000
Moscow, 119454
References
1. (1967). Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava: Ponyatie i sushhnost sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava. [International Law Course: The concept and essence of modern international law]. V 6-ti tomax. Vol.1. Moscow: Nauka. 284 p.
2. Alekseev S.S. (1985). Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. [Theory of State and law]. Moscow: Yurid. Lit. 480 p.
3. Alekseev V. A. (1961). Tridtsatiletnyaya vojna. [The Thirty Years' War] Leningrad: Uchpedgiz. 237 p.
4. Alekseev V.V., Kradin N.N., Korotaev A.V., Grinin L.E. (eds) (2014). Teoriya i metodologiya istorii. [Theory and methodology of history]. Volgograd: Uchitel. 504 p.
5. Ancilotti D. (1961). Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava: Vvedenie – obshhaya chast'. [Course in international law: an Introduction–General part]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Inostrannaya literatura. 447 p.
6. Barkin J.S., Cronin B. (1994). The state and the nation: changing norms and the rules of sovereignty in international relations // International organization. Vol. 48. No. 1. P. 107–130.
7. Bartelson J. (1995). A genealogy of sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 317 p.
8. Beljaev M.P. (2000). Frantsuzskaja i imperskaja diplomatija v poiskah mira: iz istorii Vestfal’skogo mirnogo kongressa [The French and Imperial Diplomacy in Search of Peace: from the History of the Westphalia Congress]. Moscow: IVI RAN. 111 p.
9. Blunchli I.K. (1867). O znachenii i uspexax novejshego mezhdunarodnogo prava [On the Significance and Successes of Modern International Law]. Petersburg: Izd. N.I. Lamanskogo. 90 p.
10. Bodin J. (1986). Les six livres de la Republique, liv. I–III. [The six books of the Republic, books I–III.] Paris: Fayard. 861 р.
11. Cassese A. (1986). International Law in a Divided World. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 429 p.
12. Condorelli L. (1991). Custom. In: Bedjaoui M. (ed.) International Law: Achievements and Prospects. Dordrecht: Nijhoff. Р. 179–212.
13. Croxton C.D. (2013). Westphalia: The Last Christian Peace. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 452 p.
14. Croxton D. (1999). The Peace of Westphalia of 1648 and the Origins of Sovereignty. The International History Review. Vol. 21. No. 3. Р. 569–591.
15. Farkhutdinov I.Z. (2019). Utrekhtskij mirnyj dogovor: nachalo ili konecz Vestfalya? Opyt doktrinalnogo issledovaniya problem formirovaniya sovremennoj modeli mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij v kontekste razvitiya mezhdunarodnogo prava [The Treaty of Utrecht: the beginning or the end of Westphalia? The experience of doctrinal study of the problems of the formation of a modern model of international relations in the context of the development of international law]. Evrazijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. No. 7 (134). P. 23–39.
16. Farkhutdinov I.Z. (2019). Doktrina o vestfal`skoj mirnoj sisteme: mify` i realii. [The doctrine of the Westphalian peace system: Myths and realities]. Evrazijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. No. 6 (133). P. 21–31.
17. Feldman D., Barabanov O. (2007). Esli Vestfal i bolen, to etot bolnoj skoree zhiv, chem mertv... [If Westphal is ill, then this patient is more alive than dead...]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 104–113.
18. Folker R. (2013). Istoriya Shvejtsarii. [The history of Switzerland]. Moscow: Ves mir. 144 p.
19. Grotsij G. (1994). O prave vojny` i mira: Tri knigi v kotorykh ob``yasnyayutsya estestvennoe pravo I pravo narodov, a takzhe principy publichnogo prava [On the Law of War and Peace: Three books explaining the natural law and the law of nations, as well as the principles of public law.]. Moscow: Ladomir. 868 p.
20. Gross L. (1948). The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948. The American Journal of International Law. Vol. 42. No. 1. Р. 20–41.
21. Ilyinskaya O.I. (2012). Voprosy` primeneniya mezhdunarodnykh obychno-pravovykh norm [Issues of application of international customary law norms]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. No. 11. P. 114–125.
22. Kamarovskij L.A. (1892). Osnovnyye voprosy nauki mezhdunarodnogo prava [The main issues of the science of international law]. Moscow: Univ. Tipografiya. 92 p.
23. Kelsen Н., Tucker R. (ed.) (1966). Principles of international law. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 602 р.
24. Kissindzher G. (2014). Mirovoj poryadok. [World order]. Moscow: AST. 512 p.
25. Kolb R. (1998). The formal source of jus cogens in public international law. Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht. Vol. 53. P. 69–105.
26. Kolosov Yu.M. (2006). Vidy mezhdunarodno-pravovykh obychnykh norm v mezhdunarodnom gumanitarnom prave. [Types of customary international law norms in international humanitarian law]In: Rossijskij ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. Specialnyj vypusk. 2005. Saint Petersburg: Rossiya-Neva. P. 17–21.
27. Kozlova E.I., Kutafin O.E. (1996). Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossijskoj Federatsii [Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Yurist. 480 p.
28. Krasner S.D. (1993). Westphalia and All That. In: Goldstein J., Keohane R. (eds.) Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change. London: Cornell University Press. Р. 235–264.
29. Krasner S.D. (1999) Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 248 p.
30. Kupriyanov A.V. (2019a). “Vestfal`skij mif” i “vestfal`skij” suverenitet. [The “Westphalian myth” and “Westphalian” sovereignty]. Analiz i prognozirovanie. Zhurnal IMEMO. No. 4. P. 11–23.
31. Kupriyanov A.V. (2019b). “Vestfal`skij mif”: istoriya i kritika. [“The Westphalian Myth”: history and criticism]. Analiz i prognozirovanie. Zhurnal IMEMO. No. 3. P. 37–50.
32. Lesaffer R. (2004). Peace treaties from Lodi to Westphalia. In: Lesaffer R. (ed.) Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 9–44.
33. Lesaffer R. (2014). The non-Westphalian Peace. Oxford Public International Law (OPIL). Available at: https://opil.ouplaw.com/page/non-westphalian-peace/the-nonwest-phalian-peace (accessed: 25.12.2021).
34. Levin D.B. (1962). Istoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava [History of international law]. Moscow: IMO. 136 p.
35. Lukashuk I.I. (1997). Normy mezhdunarodnogo prava v mezhdunarodnoj normativnoj sisteme [Norms of international law in the international regulatory system]. Moscow: Spark. 322 p.
36. Martens F.F. (2008). Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe pravo civilizovannykh narodov [Modern international law of civilized peoples]. V 2-x tomax. Vol. 1. Moscow: Zertsalo. 368 p.
37. Morgenthau H.J. (1948). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred Knopf. 489 p.
38. O’Connell D.P. (1965). International Law. Two vol. Vol. I. London: Stevens and Sons Ltd. 651 p.
39. Oppenghiem L. (1948). Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. T. 1. Polutom 1. Perevod s anglijskogo [International Law. Vol.1. Semi-half 1. Translated from English] Moscow: Inostrannaya literatura. 407 p.
40. Osiander A. (2001). Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth. International Organization. Vol. 55. No. 2. Р. 251–287.
41. Patton S. (2019). The Peace of Westphalia and it Affects on International Relations, Diplomacy and Foreign Policy. The Histories. Vol. 10. No. 1. P. 91–99.
42. Porshnev B. F. (1970). Frantsija, Anglijskaja revoljutsija i evropejskaja politika v seredine XVII v. [France, the English Revolution and European Politics in the Middle of the XVIIth Century]. Moscow: Nauka. 436 p.
43. Prokopjev A.Ju. (2002). Germanija v epokhu religioznogo raskola. 1555–1648 [Germany in the Age of the Religious Divisions. 1555–1648]. St. Petersburg: IC Gumanitarnaja Akademija. 384 p.
44. Rembault A. (1890). Recueil des instructions données aux ambassadeurs et ministres de France: depuis les traités de Westphalie jusqu'à la Révolution française, v. Russie, livre premier. Paris: Felix Alcan Editeur. 576 p.
45. Revyakin A.V., Vasil'eva N.Yu. (2018). Istoriya mezhdunarodny’x otnoshenij: v 3 tomax. T. 1: Ot Vestfal’skogo mira do okonchaniya Pervoj mirovoj vojny’. [History of International Relations: in 3 volumes. Vol. 1: From the Peace of Westphalia to the end of the First World War] / Pod red. A.V. Torkunova, M.M. Narinskogo. 3-e izdanie. M.: Aspekt Press. 400 p.
46. Safonov V. E. (2021). Vestfalskij traktat 1648 goda i ego vliyanie na formirovanie printsipov mezhdunarodnogo prava [The Treaty of Westphalia of 1648 and its influence on the formation of the principles of international law]. Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast’. Vol. 2. P. 110 –117.
47. Sayamov Yu.N. (2018). Vestfalskij mir i ego principy vchera i segodnya [The Peace of Westphalia and its principles yesterday and today]. Vek globalizatsii. No. 3 (27). P. 95–105.
48. Schwarzenberger G. (1968). International Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. London: Stevens & Sons Ltd. 881 p.
49. Sinyakin I. I., Skuratova A. Yu. (2018). Normy jus cogens: istoricheskiy aspekt i sovremennoe znachenie dlya mezhdunarodnogo prava [Jus Cogens: The Historical Aspect and Contemporary Value for International Law]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta: Yuridicheskie nauki. No. 41. P. 526– 545.
50. Taube M. (1894). Istoriya zarozhdeniya sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava. (srednie veka). T. 1. Vvedenie i Chast Obshhaya [The history of the origin of modern international law (Middle Ages). Vol.1. Introduction and General Part]. Saint Petersburg: Tipo-Litografiya P. I. Shmidta. 370 p.
51. Teshke B. (2011). Mif o 1648 gode: klass, geopolitika i sozdanie sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij [The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics and the Creation of Modern International Relations]. Moscow: Izd. dom Gos. un-ta – Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. 416 p.
52. Thierry H. (1990). L'évolution du droit international: cours général de droit international public. In: Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Vol. 222. Boston. P. 9–186.
53. Thirlway H.W. (1972). International Customary Law and Codification. Leiden: Brill. 170 p.
54. Tunkin G.I. (1989). Osobennosti sozdaniya obychnykh norm mezhdunarodnogo prava [Features of the creation of customary norms of international law]. In: Baskin Yu.A., Krylov N.B., Levin D.B., Movchan A.P., Mullerson R.A., Tunkin G.I., Usenko E.T., Ushakov N.A., Feldman D.I. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava. V 7 tomakh. T. 1. Moscow: Nauka. P. 189–220.
55. Vattel E. (1960). Pravo narodov ili principy` estestvennogo prava, primenyaemy`e k povedeniyu i delam natsij i suverenov [The law of peoples or the principles of natural law applied to the conduct and affairs of nations and sovereigns]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat. 720 p.
56. Vylegzhanin A.N., Zagajnov E.T.,Kapustin A.Ya, Nefedov B.I. (eds.) (2021). Mezhdunarodnoe pravo v 2 ch. Chast 1 [International law in two parts. Part 1]. Moscow: Yurajt. 329 p.
57. Weber C. (1995). Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State, and Symbolic Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, xiv, 147 p.
58. Whaley J. (2012). Germany and the Holy Roman Empire, Volume I: Maximilian I to the Peace of Westphalia 1493–1648. New York: Oxford University Press. 637 p.
Review
For citations:
Nefedov B.I. The critique of the Westphalian peace narrative. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2022;20(3):6-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2022.20.3.70.3
Views:
758
Email this article 