Migration statecraft managing migration flows at a bilateral level

This article assesses the theoretical contours and effectiveness of migration governance and diplomacy as an instrument of statecraft in interstate relations. The first part provides an overview of the stakes and challenges of migration within the fields of international relations and political theory. In particular, the category of migration defies the theoretical model of the nation-state, on which traditional IR and political theory are grounded. The second part highlights how the state, through the securitization of migration, uses migration as a tool to reaffirm its defining features: reinforcing its borders, legitimating state sovereignty, and building societal security. The third section demonstrates the usefulness of the category of statecraft within the context of migration governance at a bilateral level owing to the absence of a global normative framework. This relationship can serve different purposes, depending on the context: to harm, to deter, to bargain, to escalate. The last section presents contemporary case studies of the application of migration statecraft by the United States and Russia, as well as by member states along external border of the European Union and within the Schengen space. The elements of "migration statecraft" evidenced by these episodes focus on several objectives: trade blackmail, cooperation in an asymmetrical relation, political threat, and diplomatic escalation for electoral purposes. The variety of these cases illustrates the specificity of statecraft in comparison with foreign policy analysis. While the latter refers to a general and long-term strategy, the former is context-dependent and specific to achievement of a precise desired outcome.

1. Adamson F.B. (2006). Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security, International Security. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 165–199.

2. Adamson F.B., Tsourapas G. (2018). Migration Diplomacy. World Politics. International Studies Perspectives. Vol. 20. No. 2. P. 1–16. DOI: 10.1093/isp/eky015.

3. Anderson B. (2006). Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, New York: Verso. 240 p.

4. Appadurai A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 229 p.

5. Arendt H. (1976). The Origins of totalitarianism. Orlando: Harvest Book. 527 p.

6. Crowley-Vigneau A., Le Saux F. (2021). Language, globalization and statecraft. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 92–106.

7. Badie B. (1995). La fin des territoires. Essai sur le désordre international et l'utilité sociale du respect. Paris: Fayard. 282 p.

8. Benhabib S. (2005). Borders, Boundaries, and Citizenship. Political Science and Politics. Vol. 38. No. 4. P. 673–677.

9. Benhabib S. (2020). Decriminalizing Migration: Moral Resources, Juridical Ideas. Reset-DOC. URL: https://www.resetdoc.org/story/decriminalizing-migration-moral-resources-juridical-ideas/ (accessed: 27.04.2021).

10. Bigo D. (2011). Le "Nexus" Sécurité, Frontière, Immigration : Programme Et Diagramme. Cultures Et Conflits. No. 84. P. 7–12.

11. Bigo D. (2014). The (In)Securitization Practices of the Three Universes of EU Border Control: Military/ Navy – Border guards/police – database analysts. Security Dialogue. Vol. 45. No. 3. P. 209–225.

12. Bobbio N. (1989). Democracy and Dictatorship: The Nature and Limits of State Power. Oxford: Polity Press. 186 p.

13. Busekist von A. (2004). Uses and Misuses of the Concept of Identity. Security Dialogue. Vol. 35. No. 1. P. 35–81. DOI: 10.1177/0967010604042537.

14. Çandar C. (2020). Turkey’s Blue Homeland Doctrine: Signaling Perpetual Conflict in the Mediterranean and Rough Waters Ahead. The Turkey analyst. URL: https://www.turkeyanalyst.org/publications/turkey-analyst-articles/item/648-turkey%E2%80%99s-blue-homeland-doctrine-signaling-perpetualconflict-in-the-mediterranean-and-rough-waters-ahead.html (accessed: 27.04.2021).

15. Clark I. (1998). Beyond the Great Divide: Globalization and the Theory of International Relations. Review of International Studies. Vol. 24. No. 4. P. 479–498.

16. Chudinovskikh O., Denisenko M. (2014). Population Mobility in the Commonwealth of Independent States: Whither Common Migration Policy? CARIM-East Research Report. CMR Working Papers, no 74 (132), Centre of Migration Research, University of Warsaw.

17. Czajka A. (2014). Migration in the Age of the Nation-state: Migrants, Refugees, and the National Order of Things. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. Vol. 39. No. 3. P. 151–163.

18. Doty R. (1996). The Double-Writing of Statecraft: Exploring State Responses to Illegal Immigration. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 171–189.

19. Felbab-Brown V. (2021). The Wall. The real costs of a barrier between the United States and Mexico. Brookings. URL: https://www.brookings.edu/essay/the-wall-the-real-costs-of-a-barrier-between-theunited-states-and-mexico/ (accessed: 27.04.2021).

20. Foucault M. (2003). Society Must Be Defended. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York: Picador. 310 p.

21. Gellner E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. 150 p.

22. Greenhill K. (2010). Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement, Coercion, and Foreign Policy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. 342 p.

23. Greenhill K. (2016). Open Arms Behind Barred Doors: Fear, Hypocrisy, and Policy Schizophrenia in the European Migration Crisis. European Law Journal. No. 22. P. 317–32.

24. de Haas H. Castles S. & Miller M.J. (2020). The Age of Migration. International Population Movements in the Modern World. London: Macmillan Education. 401 p.

25. Hampshire J. (2013). The Politics of Immigration: Contradictions of the Liberal State. Cambridge: Polity Press. 224 p.

26. Hollifield J. (2004). The Emerging Migration State. The International Migration Review. Vol. 38. No. 3. P. 885–912.

27. Huysmans J. (2000). The EU and the securitization of migration. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 38. No. 5. P. 751–777.

28. Huysmans J. (2006). The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London: Routledge. 191 p.

29. Içduygu A., ÜStüBici A. (2014). Negotiating Mobility, Debating Borders: Migration Diplomacy in Turkey-EU Relations. In: Schwenken H., Russ-Sattar S. (eds) New Border and Citizenship Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 44–59.

30. Ivakhnyuk I. (2017). Proposals For Russia’s Migration Strategy Through 2035. Moscow: RIAC. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/en/activity/publications/proposals-for-russia-s-migration-strategythrough-2035/

31. Jordan J., Stulberg A. & Troitskiy M. (2021a). Statecraft in U.S.-Russia Relations: Meaning, Dilemmas, and Significance. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 19. No. 1e. P. 4–17.

32. Jordan J., Stulberg A. & Troitskiy M. (2021b). Statecraft in U.S.-Russia Relations: Meaning, Dilemmas, and Significance. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 19. No. 1r. P. 6–25.

33. Kymlicka W. (2007). Multicultural Odysseys. Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity. New York: Oxford University Press. 374 p.

34. Meierotto L. (2020). Immigration, Environment, and Security on the U.S.-Mexico Border. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 250 p.

35. Nye J., Keohane R. (1971). Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction, International Organization. Vol. 25. No. 3. P. 329–349.

36. Pagani C. (2019). Cold Wind Across the Alps: Franco–Italian Rivalry and the Europeanization of Political Competition. Reset-DOC. URL: https://www.resetdoc.org/story/cold-wind-across-alps-franco-italianrivalry-europeanization-political-competition/ (accessed: 27.04.2021).

37. Resnik J. (2017). Bordering By Law: The Migration Of Law, Crimes, Sovereignty, And The Mail. Nomos. Vol. 57. American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy. P. 79–201.

38. Ryazantsev S., Bogdanov I., Dobrokhleb V. & Lukyanets A. (2017). Migration from central Asian countries to Russia and Kazakhstan in the context of integration processes in the Eurasian economic union format. Central Asia and the Caucasus. Vol. 18. P. 39–49.

39. Schenk C. (2018). Why Control Immigration? Strategic Uses of Migration Management in Russia. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 374 p.

40. Skinner A. (2020). Erdogan Unlikely to Back Down in Mediterranean Despite Oil and Gas Glut. Washington Institute. URL: https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/erdogan-unlikely-back-downmediterranean-despite-oil-and-gas-glut (accessed: 27.04.2021).

41. Talbot V. (2020). Turkey’s Struggle for Influence in the Eastern Mediterranean. Italian Institute for International Political Studies. URL: https://www.ispionline.it/en/pubblicazione/turkeys-struggleinfluence-eastern-mediterranean-26977 (accessed: 27.04.2021).

42. Terry K. (2021). The EU-Turkey Deal, Five Years On: A Frayed and Controversial but Enduring Blueprint. Migration Policy Institute. URL: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/eu-turkey-deal-five-years-on (accessed: 27.04.2021).

43. Totten R. (2017). Statecraft and Migration: A Research Note on American Strategies to Use Immigration in Foreign Policy from the Founding Era through the Early Twenty-First Century. Diplomacy & Statecraft. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 344–370.

44. Wæver O., Buzan B., Kelstrup M., Lemaitre P. (1993). Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press. 221 p.

45. Walsh P.W. (2020). The new Immigration Bill: closing the door on freedom of movement. The Migration Observatory at University of Oxford. URL: migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/commentaries/the-new-immigration-bill-closing-the-door-on-freedom-of-movement (accessed: 27.04.2021).

46. Walzer M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books. 345 p.

47. Walzer M. (1990). What Does It Mean to Be an "American"? Social Research. Vol. 57. No. 3. P. 591–614.