Ad hoc alliances as italian key statecraft tool

Despite economic troubles and constant political instability Italy manages to keep its historical role as a key EU state and one of the three major economies of the region, which justifies its G7 membership and therefore formally endues it with a great power status. This owes to accommodationism as the main behavioral pattern since the establishment of the Italian Republic and the skillful use of ad hoc alliances – a pragmatic statecraft tool which renders Italy flexible and unpredictable. Too big to be defensive, but not big enough to be offensive, Italy does not provoke antagonism in any EU country, becoming a potential universal ally. Cooperation with Greece on fiscal flexibility, with Spain and France on coronabonds and Hungary on EU common migration policy strengthens its bargaining power in the EU, since the latter needs Italy for reasons of security and solidarity. Being furthermore a devoted US partner since the end of World War II, Italy considers US a guarantor of its national security and position on the international arena and is inclined to lend its support to Washington even if such actions contradict the policies of closer geostrategic partners in the EU. Thanks to such allegiance Italy manages to preserve a certain room for maneuvering in interactions with other non-euroatlantic partners to an extent that does not imperil its strategic alliance with Washington, which has always been an invariable of Italian foreign policy. However, scarce attention from the USA under the current administration makes Italy utilize its statecraft tools towards Washington as well, and a pragmatic rapprochement with China on the Belt and Road Initiative and humanitarian aid during the pandemic presents a clear example thereof.

1. Alekseenkova E.S. (2020) Diskursivnaia sila KNR protiv normativnoi sily ES: kazus Italii. [PRC Discoursive Force Against the Normative Force of the EU: The Case of Italy]. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. Vol. 64. No. 5. P. 62–72.

2. Bogaturov A.D. (ed.) (2010). Sovremennaya mirovaya politika. Prikladnoj analiz [Contemporary World Politics. Applied Analysis]. Moscow: Aspekt Рress. 592 p.

3. Castronovo V. (1999). Fiat, 1899–1999: Un Secolo di Storia. Rizzoli. 2093 p.

4. Croci O. (2008). Not a Zero-Sum Game: Atlanticism and Europeanism in Italian Foreign Policy. The International Spectator. Vol. 34. No. 4. P. 137–155.

5. Croci O. (2015). All Quiet on the Western Front. Italy and Transatlantic Relations. In: Marchi L., Whitman R. (eds.) Italy’s Foreign Policy in the Twenty First Century: A Contested Nature? London: Routledge. P. 43–64.

6. Diodato E., Niglia F. (2017). Italy in International Relations. The Foreign Policy Conundrum. Palgrave Macmillan. 123 p.

7. Holsti K. (1976). The Study of Diplomacy. In: Rosenau J.N., Thompson K.W., Bond G. (eds) World Politics. New York: Free Press. Р. 293–311.

8. Jordan J., Stulberg A. & Troitskiy M. (2021a). Statecraft in U.S.-Russia Relations: Meaning, Dilemmas, and Significance. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 19. No. 1e. P. 4–17.

9. Jordan J., Stulberg A. & Troitskiy M. (2021b). Statecraft in U.S.-Russia Relations: Meaning, Dilemmas, and Significance. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 19. No. 1r. P. 6–25.

10. Istomin I. A, Baikov A. A. (2019). Dinamika mezhdunarodnykh al'iansov v neravnovesnoi mirovoi sisteme. [Dynamics of International Alliances in an Unbalanced World Structure]. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. Vol. 63. No. 1. P. 34–48.

11. Istomin I.A. (2018). Logika povedeniia gosudarstv v mezhdunarodnoi politike [Logics of States’ Behaviour in International Politics]. Moscow: Aspekt Рress. 296 p.

12. Khrustalev M.A. (2011). Metodologiia prikladnogo politicheskogo analiza [Methodology of Applied Political Analysis]. Moscow: Prospekt. 160 p.

13. Manta F. (2018). La Diplomazia Economica Come Strumento delle Relazioni Internazionali: l’Esempio Mattei e il Marchio “Fiat”. Eunomia. Rivista semestrale di Storia e Politica Internazionali. No. 1. P. 197–208.

14. Maslova E.A. (2016). Evropeizm i atlantizm vo vneshnei politike Italii [Italian Foreign Policy between Atlanticism and Eurocentrism]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 106–115.

15. Maslova E.A., Savino G. (2020). Pandemiia po-ital'ianski: stress-test dlya politicheskoi sistemy [Pandemic all’italiana: stress-test for the political system]. Sovremennaia Evropa. No. 4. P. 37–49.

16. Nuti L. (2011). Italian Foreign Policy in the Cold War. A Constant Search for Status. In: Carbone M. (ed.) Italy in the Post-Cold War Order: Adaptation, Bipartisanship and Visibility. Lanham: Lexington Books. Р. 25–45.

17. Rosa P. (2014). The Accommodationist State: Strategic Culture and Italy’s Military Behaviour. International Relations. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 88–115.

18. Salacone A. (2013). Le Relazioni Italo-Sovietiche nel Decennio 1958-1968: Uno Sguardo da Mosca. Storicamente. No. 9. 11 p. URL: https://storicamente.org/sites/default/images/articles/media/1757/salacone.pdf (accessed: 10.04.2021).

19. Salaсone A. (2014). SSSR i «neo-atlanticheskaia» Italiia v 1960-e gg. [The USSR and and the “Neo-Atlantic” Italy in the 1960-s]. The Italian Republic in a Changing World. Reports of the Institute of Europe. № 306. P. 110–122.

20. Salaсone A. (2018). Energeticheskaia politika SSSR kak faktor vliianiia na Italiiu v 1960-kh godakh [Energy Policy of the USSR as a factor of the Influence on the Italy in 1960s]. Sovremennaia Evropa. No. 6. P. 134–141.

21. Shakleina T.A. (ed.) (2014). Vvedenie v prikladnoi analiz mezhdunarodnykh situatsii [Introduction to applied analysis of international situations]. Moscow: Aspekt Рress. 288 p.

22. Shibkova M., Maslova E., Loreto R. (2019) Evolution of the Russian President V. V. Putin’s Image in the Opinion of the Italian Citizens [Evoliutsiia obraza Prezidenta Rossii V.V. Putina v glazakh ital'ianskikh grazhdan]. Izvestia of the Ural Federal University. Series 3 – Social Sciences. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 140–153.

23. Zonova T.V. (2019). Elections of 2019: Eurooptimists vs Eurosceptics [Vybory 2019 goda: evrooptimisty protiv evroskeptikov]. Sovremennaia Evropa. No. 3. P. 62–69.