Preview

International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy

Advanced search

Taxing digital economy the end of optimism

https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2021.19.2.65.6

Abstract

The rapidly developing digital economy seriously affects the tax systems of different countries. At the end of XX century there was an optimistic approach to the taxation of digital economy. It was considered that there is no need for the new taxes, new tax regimes and the traditional concepts of international taxation were expected to sustain the new challenges. It was also considered that even with implementation of new technologies tax rules should keep on being clear and simple with high level of certainty, so that taxpayers could anticipate the tax consequences in advance. The digital economy was supported and exempt from taxation. Nowadays the possibility of imposing the new special taxes on digital economy is considered and some countries already introduced those taxes. The pessimism in respect of digital economy is now prevailing in the tax systems. However, the tightening trend in the tax regimes may entail the discrimination of the new technologies against those, which were developed before and already entered into the markets. The controversies between the technological center and periphery play certain role here. For the countries of technology periphery to join the tightening trend means to curb development of their domestic hightech industry as discrimination in taxation of foreign countries is still considered inacceptable. It is obvious that the regulatory pendulum: from the most optimistic to the extreme pessimistic approach, until the desperate protectionist measures, should be balanced with the time. The panic in the publications about the prospective of the digital economy taxation shall subside and turn to the constructive suggestions without unnecessary fiscal focus.

About the Authors

S. Shokhin
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Sergey Shokhin

Moscow 119454



E. Kudryashova
Institute of legislation and comparative law
Russian Federation

Ekaterina Kudryashova

Moscow, 117218



A. Shashkova
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Anna Shashkova

Moscow 119454



References

1. Blair-Stanek A. (2015) Intellectual Property Law Solutions to Tax Avoidance. UCLA Law Review. 2015. No. 2. P. 4–72.

2. Boccia F., Leonardi R. (2016) The challenge of the digital economy: markets, taxation and appropriate economic models. Palgrave Macmillan. 148 p.

3. BCG. (2012). The Connected World. The Internet Economy in the G-20. The $ 4.2 Trillion Growth Opportunity. Report. The Boston Consulting Group. 53 p.

4. Dharmapala D., Riedel N. (2013). Earnings Shocks and Tax-Motivated Income-Shifting: Evidence from European Multinationals. Journal of Public Economic. 2013. No. 97. P. 96.

5. Kenney M., Zysman J. (2020). The platform economy: restructuring the space of capitalist accumulation. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Sociaty. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 55–76.

6. EU (2014). Report of the Commission Expert Group on Taxation of the Digital Economy. Brussels: European Union.78 p.

7. Goldfarb A., Tucker C. (2019). Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 57. No. 1. P. 3–43.

8. Haslehner W.C., Kofler G.W., Pantazatou K. (eds) (2019). Tax and the digital economy: challenges and proposals for reform. Kluwer Law International. 583 p.

9. ITU (2019) Measuring digital development. Facts and figures 2019. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) UN. URL: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2019_r1.pdf (aссessed: 15.03.2021).

10. Kasatkin, P.I., Avatkov, V.A. (2014). The soft power of migration-a hard task for the European union. Defense and Security Analysis. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 311–322.

11. Kysar R. (2018). Tax Law and the Eroding Budget Process. Law and Contemporary Problems. Vol. 81. No. 2. P. 61–98.

12. Kupchishina E.V. (2018). Digital Economy as Neo-Economy Phenomenon: Evolution of Consepts. Gosudarstvennoye upravlenie. Electronnyi Vestnik. No. 68. P. 426–444.

13. Makeeva E., Mikhaleva I. (2019). Taxation regulation of the BriCs’ innovative Companies. BRICS Law Journal. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 41–62.

14. Shashkova A., Verlaine M. (2020) “Change of tax policy model as a base for innovation development while transferring from the pre-industrial to the Industrial society”, In Kovalchik J. (ed) Post-industrial Society. P. 137–147. Palgrave Macmillan. Cham. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-59739_9_12.

15. Shokhin S., Kudryashova E. (2019). Macroeconomic Coordination in the Eurasian Economic Union: Strategic Aspects. Russian Law Journal. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 38–52.

16. OECD (1998). Electronic commerce: taxation framework conditions. Report of Committee on Fiscal Affairs. 7 p.

17. OECD (1999). Taxation and electronic commerce. Progress report, prepared by Secretariat OECD. 236 p.

18. OECD (2013). Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. URL: http://www.oecd.org/ctp/bepsactionplan.pdf (aссessed: 15.03.2021).

19. OECD (2015). Digital Economy Outlook. OECD Publishing. Paris. 280 p.

20. OECD (2018). Tax challenges arising from digitalization – interim report 2018: inclusive framework on BEPS. Paris. 243 p.

21. Oki N. (2019). The Digital Economy and Our Vanishing Tax Base. URL https://www.tkfd.or.jp/en/research/detail.php?id=666 (aссessed 01.09.2019).

22. Peitz M., Waldfogel J. (eds) (2012). The Oxford Handbook of the Digital Economy. Oxford University Press. 624 p.

23. Queralt D. (2017). Protection Not for Sale, But for Tax Compliance. International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 61. Issue 3. P. 631–641.

24. Schiller D. (1999). Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 294 p.

25. Sergeev G.S. (2018) Stroitelstvo tsifrovoi economiki v Rossii: geopoliticheskii aspect. Economicheskoye vozrozhdenie Rossii. Vol. 3 (57). P. 92–102.

26. Shelepov A. (2016) BEPS Action Plan: Global Tax Cooperation. International Organizations Research Journal. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 36–59.

27. Szczepanski M. (2020) Digital taxation. State of play and way forward. European Parliament. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/649340/EPRS_BRI(2020)649340_EN.pdf (accessed: 20.10.2020).

28. Terzi A. (2015) Global Trends in Brain Drain and Likely Scenario in the Coming Years. In Archibugi D., Filippetti A. (eds.) The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation. John Wiley & Sons. P. 407–417.

29. UNCTAD (2002). E-commerce and development report. UNCTAD. UN. New York and Geneva 2002. URL: https://unctad.org/en/Docs/ecdr2002p1_en.pdf (aссessed: 01.03.2021).

30. UNCTAD (2017). World investments report. URL: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2017_en.pdf (aссessed: 20.10.2020).

31. UNCTAD (2019). Digital economy report 2019. Value creation and capture: implications for developing countries. URL: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/der2019_en.pdf (aссessed: 15.03.2021).

32. Valente P. (2018) Digital Revolution. Tax Revolution? Bulletin for International Taxation. Vol. 72. No. 4a. P. 9–13.

33. Weidemaier C. (2017). A (very thin) market for sovereign control. Duke Law Journal. Vol. 66. P. 67–77.

34. Yudina T.M. (2016). Osmyslenie tsifrovoi economiki. Teoreticheskaya economika. No. 3. P. 12–16.


Review

For citations:


Shokhin S., Kudryashova E., Shashkova A. Taxing digital economy the end of optimism. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2021;19(2):138-150. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2021.19.2.65.6

Views: 853


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-2756 (Print)
ISSN 1811-2773 (Online)