Syrian kurds as proto-state actors from the insurgent state to the democratic confederalism

The self-proclaimed Kurdish autonomy in the Northeastern Syria has already being estimated as one-third of the country, and, despite its unrecognized status, appears to become one of the key players in the Syrian peace settlement and, at the same time, a political hostage to the situation that has developed in Syria as a result of the civil war. The article explores the formation of the self-proclaimed autonomy in the Northeastern Syria (aka Rojava, Syrian Kurdistan, Federation of Northeastern Syria, Autonomous Administration of Northern and Eastern Syria (AANES)) and puts forward the thesis of Rojava’s emergence as an insurgent state. The first part of the study analyzes it’s political system by implementation of the concept of proto-state actors for the Kurdish Self-Defense Forces (YPG) and the Democratic Union Party (PYD). Due to the inclusiveness of the Kurdish Self-Defense Forces the Kurdish non-state actors (PYD-YPG) have acquired the proto-state features, going beyond the definition of the “Syrian wing” of the Kurdistan Worker’s Party (PKK). The article focuses on the complex and diversified ethnic composition of the local population within the boundaries of the de facto autonomy. It is manifested by the presence of various political actors and movements, including those based on ethnic particularism. It is concluded that such a political structure is a fragile one due to the interethnic contradictions between the Kurds and the Arabs in the region.

1. Acun C, Keskin B. (2016). The PKK’s branch in Nothern Syria. PYD-YPG. Ankara: SETA 74 p.

2. Bartenev V. (2018) Pomosh’ “khrupkim gosudarstvam” skvoz’ prizmu risk-menedjmenta. Labirint ob’yasnitelnyh gipotez [Aiding Fragile States Through the Lens of Risk-management. Labirinth of explanatory Hypotheses]. Mezhdunarodenye protsessy. Vol. 16. No. 4(55). P. 20–41.

3. Bartolini S. Restructuring Europe. Centre formation, System building and Political Restructuring between the Nation State and the European Union. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2005. 415 p.

4. Baranovsky V.G., Naumkin V.V. (eds) (2018). Blizhniy Vostok v menyayuschemsya global'nom kontekste. [The Middle East in a Changing Global Context]. Moscow: IV RAN. 555 p.

5. Bogaturov A.D, Vinogradov A.V. (2002). Anklavno-konglomeratnyj tip razvitiya. Opyt transsistemnoy teorii [The “enclave-conglomerate” type of development. Approach to the trans-system theory]. Vostok-Zapad-Rossiya. Sbornik statey. K 70-letiyu akademika N.A. Simonii. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya. P. 109–128.

6. Carneiro R. L. (1981). The Chiefdom: Precursor of the State. In: Jones G. D., Kautz R. R., (eds.) The Transition to Statehood in the New World. Cambridge &c. P. 37–79.

7. Flach A., Ayboğa E., Knapp M. (2015). Kurdistan: Realnaya demokratiya v usloviyah vojni i blokady [Kurdistan: The Real Democracy in Conditions of War and Blockade]. Moscow. 350 р.

8. Flanigan S.T. (2009). For the Love of God: NGOs and Religious Identity in a Violent World. N.Y. 184 р.

9. Giddens A. (2005). Ustroyeniye obschestva. Ocherki teorii strukturatsii [Organızation of the Society. Essays on the Theory of Structuration]. Moscow. 528 p.

10. Gunter М. (2014). Out of nowhere: The Kurds of Syria ın Peace and War. L.: С.Hurt &Co. 120 p.

11. Kashanina T.V. (2004). Proiskhozhdeniye gosudarstva i prava [Origins of the State and the Law] Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. 325 p.

12. Knyazeva S.N. (2009). Istoriya gosudarstva i prava zarubezhnykh stran [History of the state and law of foreign countries]. Moscow. 128 p.

13. Kwarten L. (2020). Redrawing the Lines in the Sand? Quests for Decentralisation, Regional Autonomy and Independence Among Syrian Kurds and South Yemeni Separatists. In: Gervais V., van Genugten S. (eds.) Stabilising the Contemporary Middle East and North Africa: Regional Actors and New Approaches. Palgrave Macmillan. P. 233–257.

14. Lijphart A. (1997). Demokratiya v mnogosostavnykh obshchestvakh [Democracy in Plural Societies] Moscow: Nauka, 287 p.

15. Lyubashits V.Ya, Razuvayev N.V. (2018). Evol’utsiya gosudarstva: İstoricheskaya dinamika I teoriticheskaya model [Evolution of the State. Historical Dynamics and Theoretical Model. Мoscow. 533 с.

16. Lukichev P.N., Skorik A.P. (1994) Kvazigosudarstvennost' [Quazi-Statehood]. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya. No. 5. P. 139–142.

17. McColl R.W. (1969) The Insurgent State: Territorial Bases of Revolution. Annals of the American Association of. Geographers. Vol. 59. No. 4. P. 613–631.

18. Mampilly Z. C. (2011) Rebel Rulers: Insurgent governance and civilian life during war. NY and London: Cornell University Press. 320 p.

19. Naumkin V.V, Kuznetsov V.A. (2020). K voprosu o tipologizatsii negosudarstvennykh aktorov na Blizhnem Vostoke [ On the Issue of Classification of Non-State Actors in the Middle East]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya. Vol. 64. No. 6. P. 104–113.

20. Öcalan А. (2003) Özgur Insan Savunmasi [Defense of a Free Human]. Çetin Yayınları, İstanbul, 21 p.

21. Öcalan A. (2010). Demokratik Uygarlık Manifestosu: Ortadoğu’da Uygarlık Krizi ve Demokratik Uygarlık Çözümü [Manifesto of the Democratic Civilization: The Crisis of the Civilization in the Middle East and Democratic Civilization Solution]. Istanbul. Mezopotamya Yayınları. 342 p.

22. Öcalan А. (2011). Problemy preodoleniya kapitalisticheskogo modernizma i demokratizatsiya. Tsivilizatsiya. Epoha bojestv v maskah i zavualirovannih tsarey [ The Problems of Overcoming Capitalist Modernism and Democratization. Civilization. The Era of Masked Deities and Veiled Kings]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 280 p.

23. Öcalan А. (2014). Sotsiologiya svobody [Sociology of the Liberty] Vol. 3. Мoscow. Zebra E. 479 p.

24. Okrest D., Petrov D., Lebskij M. (eds) (2017). Zhizn bez gosudarstva: Revolutsiya v Kurdistane [Life without a State: the Revolution in Kurdistan]. Мoscow: Common Place. 312 p.

25. Özçelik B. (2020). Explaining the Kurdish Democratic Union Party's Self-Governance Practices in Northern Syria, 2012–18. Government and Opposition. Vol. 55. No. 4. P. 690–710.

26. Popov F. (2011). Ot «bezgosudarstvennoy territorii» k “gosudarstvu de-fakto” [From the "stateless territory" to the "de facto state"]. Mezhdunarodenyye protsessy. Vol. 9. No. 2(26).

27. Schmidinger. Th. (2018). Rojava: Revolution, War and the Future of Syria’s Kurds. London. 300 p.

28. Stansfield G. (2003). Iraqi Kurdistan: Political Development and Emergent Democracy. Routledge. 280 p.

29. Steiner H. (2009). Left Libertarianism and the Ownership of Natural Resources. Public Reason. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 1–8.

30. Szekely О. (2016). Proto-State Realignment and the Arab Spring. Middle East policy. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 75–91.

31. Vasil'yev. L. S. (1983). Problemy genezisa kitayskogo gosudarstva [Problems of the genesis of the Chinese state] Moscow: Nauka. 327 p.

32. Vasil'yev. L. S. (1980). Protogosudarstvo-chifdom kak politicheskaya struktura [Сhiefdom as a political structure]. Narody Azii i Afriki. No. 6. P. 157–175.

33. Vertyaev K.V. (2007). Kurdskiy vopros v politike Turtsii (konets XX – nachalo XIX veka) [Kurdish question in Turkish politics (late XX – early XIX centuries)]. Moscow. 254 p.

34. Vertyaev K.V. (2018). Kurds within the borders of new states under the Sevres (1920) and Lozanne (1923) Treates. In: Naumkin V., Popova I. (eds) The Kurds: Legend of the East. Moscow. P. 242–258.

35. Vertyaev К.V (2015). Spetsifika kurdskogo natsional’nogo dvijeniya i ego sovremennaya aktualizatsiya v Turtsii i Sirii [Specifics of the Kurdish National Movement and its acualization in medern Turkey and Syria]. Natsii i Natsionalizm na musul’manskom Vostoke. Moscow: IV RAN. P. 361–374.

36. Weller M. (2009). Contested Statehood: Kosovo's Struggle for Independence. Oxford University Press. 328 p.

37. Zvyagel'skaya I.D., Kuznetsov. V.A. (2017). Gosudarstvo na Blizhnem Vostoke. Budushcheye nachalos' vchera [State in the Middle East. The future began yesterday]. Mezhdunarodnyye protsessy. Vol. 15. No. 4 (51). P. 6–19.