Turkey’s response to international terrorism attitude towards isil and al-qaida

The article analyzes the interconnection between the direction of Turkey's struggle against terrorism with modern Islamist and nationalist ideas of Turkey. A majority of Turkish citizens following the Hanafi school of Islam, have historically opposed the purist religious doctrine of the Salafists. The author emphasizes that neither Turkey’s secular tradition nor its predominant, moderate Islamic theology has made Turkish citizens immune to radicalization. Modern Turkish history has produced several violent Islamist organizations advocating Salafi views in line with the Islamic State’s ideology. Turkish jihadists have been found among the ranks of foreign fighters in several recent conflict zones abroad. The article proves that when the uprisings began in Syria in 2011, Turkey threw its full support behind the opposition – harboring and mobilizing dissidents, arming rebels, and allowing free passage along the Syrian-Turkish border. Jihadists began to exploit the security vacuum, including ISIL and Jabhat al-Nusra (now Hayat Tahrir al-Sham), the Syrian affiliate of al-Qaeda. The article also addresses the problems of Ankara’s indifference at the first stage towards the ISIL’s activities within and across Turkish territory. While the crossings between Turkey and ISIL territory officially were closed in 2014, smuggling through the frontier continued apace and Ankara only later started to engage ISIL militarily. The author concludes that the period of active struggle against al-Qaeda in Turkey (2003-2011) gave way after 2012 to a reduction in counterterrorism operations and now supporters of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham thank Turkey for protecting them against Syrian government forces, Russia and Iran.

1. Arbor A. (2006). The Fethullah Gulen Movement and Its Politics of Representation in Turkey. Mucahit Bilici University of Michigan. 20 P. URL: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/74242/j.1478-1913.2006.00115.x.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed: 20.02.2021).

2. Bildirici M., Ersin Ö., Turkmen C., Yalcinkaya Y. (2012). The Persistence Effect Of Unemployment In Turkey: An Analysis оf the 1980–2010 Period. Journal of Business Economics & Finance. Vol.1. Issue 3. P. 22–32.

3. International Crisis Group. (2020). Calibrating the Response: Turkey’s ISIS Returnees. Europe & Central Asia. Report 258. URL: https://www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/westerneuropemediterranean/turkey/258-calibrating-response-turkeys-isis-returnees (accessed: 18.02.2021).

4. Cappello J., Megahan P., Hannah J., Schanzer J. (2016). Covering the Bases: Reassessing U.S. Military Deployments in Turkey After the July 25 Coup D’état. Foundation for Defense of Democracies. 33 p. URL: http://www.defenddemocracy.org/content/uploads/documents/Covering_the_Bases.pdf (accessed: 17.02.2021). .

5. Davutoglu A. (2001). Stratejik Derinlik Turkiye'nin Uluslararsi Konumu. Istanbul: Kure Yayinlari. 600 p.

6. Duran B. (2013). Understanding the AK Party’s Identity Politics: A Civilizational Discourse and its Limitations. Insight Turkey. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 91–109.

7. Duran B., Yıldırım E. (2005). Islamism, trade unionism and civil society: the case of Hak-I˙s¸ labour confederation in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies. Vol. 41. Issue 2. P. 227–248.

8. Hammond A. (2015). Salafism Infiltrates Turkish Religious Discourse. Middle East Institute. URL: https:// www.mei.edu/publications/salafism-infiltrates-turkish-religious-discourse (accessed: 16.02.2021).

9. Hockenos P. (2017). Erdogan’s International Network of Muslim Cleric Spies. Foreign Policy. URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/03/27/erdogans-international-network-of-muslim-cleric-spies-turkeygermany-gulen-coup/ (accessed: 18.02.2021).

10. Ivanova I.I. (2017). Evolyutsiya blizhnevostochnoj politiki Tureckoj respubliki (1923–2016) [Evolution of the Middle East Policy of the Turkish Republic (1923–2016)]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. 424 s.

11. Kudryashova I.V., Matyuhin V.V. (2013). Turtsiya: natsional'nye interesy i imperskost' [Turkey: National Interests and Imperialism]. Politicheskaya nauka. No. 3. P. 117–136

12. Nadein-Raevskij V. A. (2017). Ekstremizm i terrorizm v sovremennoj Turtsii [Extremism and Terrorism in the Modern Turkey]. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti. Specvypusk: Problemy terrorizma, nasil'stvennogo ekstremizma i radikalizacii (rossijskie i amerikanskie podhody). No. 1(52). P. 182–204.

13. Shlykov P.V. (2018). Transformatsiya roli Turtsii v bor'be s mezhdunarodnym terrorizmom na Blizhnem Vostoke [Transformation of the Turkey’s Role in the Struggle against International Terrorism in thw Middle East]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 13. No. 2. P. 53–74.

14. Stein A. (2016). Islamic State Networks in Turkey: Recruitment for the Caliphate. The Atlantic Council. 12 p. URL: http://www.publications.atlanticcouncil.org/islamic-state-networks-in-turkey/ (accessed: 08.02.2021).

15. Kireev N.G. (ed.). (2001). Turtsiya mezhdu Evropoj i Aziej. Itogi evropeizatsii na iskhode XX v [Turkey between Europe and Asia. Results of Europeanization at the Dawn of the 20th Century]. Moscow: IV RAN. 535 p.

16. Ugur E. (2006). Intellectual roots of ‘Turkish Islam’ and approaches to the ‘Turkish model’. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. Vol. 24. No. 2. P. 327–345.

17. Ul’chenko N.YU. (2002). Ekonomika Turtsii v usloviyah liberalizatasii (80–90-e gody) [Turkish Economy under Conditions of Liberalization (80s – 90s)]. Moscow: Institut izucheniya Izrailya i Blizhnego Vostoka. 236 p.

18. Yilmaz I. (2018). Erdoganism and Islamist Use of Education in Turkey. Deakin University. 29 p. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3278481(accessed: 09.01.2021).

19. Zvyagel'skaya I.D., Kozhanov N.A., Svistunova I. A., Surkov N.YU. (2019). Gosudarstva Blizhnego Vostoka v poiskakh vneshnepoliticheskoj identichnosti (Turetskaya, iranskaya i saudovskaya modeli) [States oft he Middle East in Search for Foreign Policy Identity (Turkish, Iranian and Saudi Models]. Mirovaya ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Vol. 63. No. 9. P. 93–103.