Preview

International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy

Advanced search

Eastern Mediterranean in a search of a new balance of interests

https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2021.19.3.66.7

Abstract

The Eastern Mediterranean has become an arena of fierce competition for an access to sea spaces and their resources, including hydrocarbons. Coastal states and a number of non-regional players are deeply involved in this rivalry. Currently the region is witnessing a confrontation between Turkey and a "balancing coalition", which consists of Greece, Cyprus, Israel and Egypt. The article deals with the problem of maritime spaces delimitation in the Aegean Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean. It also studies the policies of the main actors. The primary goal is to make an assessment of the risks and to analyze possible ways to reduce tension by balancing the interests of major players. The analysis shows that Turkey intends to consistently defend its claims on the continental shelf based on the so-called "principle of justice", thus challenging the Greek claims. Ankara managed to prevent the construction of the EastMed gas pipeline, thus hurting the interests of other countries of the region. In turn, Greece appeals to the norms of international maritime law. Itis actively looking now for allies that could help it contain Turkey. There is a potential “anti-Turkey” coalition comprising France, Israel and Egypt. The authors conclude that, despite the extreme complexity of the situation, especially from the legal point of view, tension in the Eastern Mediterranean can be reducedbecause tthe countries of the region are reluctant to engage in a military confrontation with Turkey and alternative routes for energy transportation exist. In addition, there are signs that Greece might be open to a reasonable compromise with Turkey.

About the Authors

P. Gudev
Primakov’s Institute of World Economy and Politics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Pavel Gudev

Moscow



I. Ibragimov
Primakov’s Institute of World Economy and Politics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Ibragim Ibragimov

Moscow



Yu. Kvashnin
Primakov’s Institute of World Economy and Politics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Yuri Kvashnin

Moscow



L. Samarskaya
Primakov’s Institute of World Economy and Politics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Lyudmila Samarskaya

Moscow



I. Svistunova
Primakov’s Institute of World Economy and Politics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Irina Svistunova

Moscow



N. Surkov
Primakov’s Institute of World Economy and Politics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Nikolay Surkov

Moscow



P. Timofeev
Primakov’s Institute of World Economy and Politics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Pavel Timofeev

Moscow



References

1. Bahcheli T., Couloumbis T., Carley P. (1997). Greek-Turkish Relations and U.S. Foreign Policy. Washington: United States Institute of Peace. 57 p.

2. Başlar K. (2001). Two Facets of the Aegean Sea Dispute: 'de lege lata' and 'de lege ferenda'. In: Başlar K. (ed.). Turkey and international law. Ankara: Özen Publ. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20060822022924/http://www.turkishweekly.net/pdf/aegean_sea.pdf (accessed: 28.02.2021).

3. Chrysochou G., Siousiouras P. (2014). The Aegean Dispute in the Context of Contemporary Judicial Decisions on Maritime Delimitation. Laws. Vol.3. No. 1. Р. 12–49.

4. Dentice G., Talbot V. (2020). A Geopolitical Sea: The New Scramble for the Mediterranean. ISPI Dossier. URL: https://www.ispionline.it/sites/default/files/pubblicazioni/ispi_dossier_a_geopolitical_sea_july_2020.pdf (accessed: 12.03.2021).

5. Dyke Jon M. van. (1996). The Aegean Sea dispute: options and avenues. Marine Policy. Vol. 20. No. 5. Р. 397–404.

6. Georgiades E. (2011). The Imia Islets: A Beginning to the Maritime Delimitation of the Aegean Sea Dispute. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 103–126.

7. Gorbunova N. (2020). Bor’ba za shelf Vostochnogo Sredizemnomorya: itogi i perspectivy [The Struggle for Eastern Mediterranean shelf: outcomes and prospects. Vestnik Instituta Vostokovedeniya RAN. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 64–79. DOI 10.31696/2618-7302-2020-2-64-79.

8. Gürdeniz Cem. (2018). Mavi Vatan Yazilari [Blue Homeland Writings]. Kirmizi Kedi Yayinevi. 528 р.

9. Gürdeniz Cem. (2020). Mavi Vatan'in Güney Cephesi: Dogu Akdeniz [The Southern Front of the Blue Homeland: Eastern Mediterranean]. Pankus Yayinlari. 192 р.

10. Heraclides A. (2011). Imagined Enemies: The Aegean Conflict. Mediterranean Politics. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 221–239. DOI: 10.1080/13629395.2011.583740

11. İnan Y., Gözen M. Turkey’s Maritime Boundary Relations // Kibaroglu M. (ed.) Eastern Mediterranean. Countries and Issues. Ankara Foreign Policy Institute, 2009. Р. 154–164.

12. İnat K. (2020). Türkiye’nin Doğu Akdeniz Politikası: Hedefler, Araçlar, Yöntemler. Kriter Dergisi. September. P. 26–28.

13. Irkhin A. (2021). “Mir bol'she pyati”. Stanovleniye Turtsii v global'noy aktora mirovoy politiki: perspektivy i vyzovy dlya Rossii ["The world is more than five." Turkey's Becoming a Global Actor of World Politics: Prospects and Challenges for Russia]. Vestnik RUDN. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 91–107. DOI 10.22363/2313-0660-2021-21-1-91-107.

14. Karbuz S. (2018). Geostrategic importance of East Mediterranean gas resources. In: Energy Economy, Finance and Geostrategy. Cham: Springer. P. 237–255.

15. Melkonyan S.G. (2020). Vneshnepoliticheskaya strategiya Gosudarstva Izrail' v Vostochnom Sredizemnomor'ye na primere Gretsii i Kipra [Foreign Policy Strategy of the State of Israel in the Eastern Mediterranean: The Example of Greece and Cyprus]. Nauchno-analiticheskij zhurnal «Obozrevatel’–Observer». No. 9. (368). P. 71–82.

16. Papadakis K. (2018). The Greece-Turkey dispute in the Aegean and the ICJ sea border delimitation case of UkraineRomania: similarities and differences in a comparative perspective. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 36–46.

17. Papastavridis E. (2010). Enforcement Jurisdiction in the Mediterranean Sea: Illicit Activities and the Rule of Law on the High Seas. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 569–600.

18. Prozorova G. (2020). "Periferiynaya strategiya" Izrailya: sovremennoye videniye [Peripheral strategy of Israel: Modern Vision]. The Herald of the Diplomatic Academy of the MFA of Russia. Russia and the World. No. 1(23). P. 161–176.

19. Shama N. (2019). Between Alliance and Entente: The Egyptian-Greek-Cypriot Partnership. In: Tziarras Z. (ed.) The New Geopolitics of the Eastern Mediterranean: Trilateral Partnerships and Regional Security, Re-imagining the Eastern Mediterranean Series. PCC Report, 3. Nicosia: PRIO Cyprus Centre. P. 95–111.

20. Yaycı C. (2019). Libya Türkiye’nin Denizden Komşusudur: Doğu Akdeniz’de Deniz Alanlarının Sınırlandırılmasında Libya’nın Rolü. İstanbul: Avrasya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi Yayınları. 150 p.

21. Yılmaz E. (2020). The Past and Today of Turkish Foreign Policy within the Fraimwork of Developments in the East Mediterranean. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi. Vol. 48. Winter. P. 27–48. https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.791715


Review

For citations:


Gudev P., Ibragimov I., Kvashnin Yu., Samarskaya L., Svistunova I., Surkov N., Timofeev P. Eastern Mediterranean in a search of a new balance of interests. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2021;19(3):104-122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2021.19.3.66.7

Views: 290


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-2756 (Print)
ISSN 1811-2773 (Online)