Regional reform and its impact on the electoral behavior during 2012 and 2017 presidential elections in France

The article deals with the 2015 territorial reform in France which reduced the number of regions and changed jurisdiction of the center and regions. In the paper the authors try to learn whether and how this reform affected electoral behavior in the regions during the first round of 2012 and 2017 presidential elections, whether there is a difference between them, and what are the voting patterns in French regions. The author used Moran’s index of spatial autocorrelation in order to answer the questions and analyze “neighborhood effect”. Besides the researcher employed multivariate explanatory data analysis to uncover the electoral patterns. Among the variables underlying the patterns the author selected socio-economic and demographic ones, as well as the number of criminal acts against Muslim-migrants in the context of the 2015 migrant crisis in Europe. The scholar concludes that territorial reform mitigated the neighborhood effect in regional electoral behavior which indicates the process of decentralization. As for electoral patterns, it is in the Eastern regions where the citizens vote for Marin Le Pen given high levels of migration and unemployment there. In the West where migration and unemployment are low people tend to choose a candidate whose agenda is not centered around migrants. The winner usually gets support from the capital region where migration and unemployment are low but many criminal acts against Muslim-migrants were reported. Consequently, the reform itself did not change electoral patterns in the regions which indicates the tendency towards recentralization and leaves the capital region in the center of political process.

1. Anselin L. (1995). Local Indicators of Spatial Association – LISA. Geographical Analysis. No. 27. P. 93–115.

2. Balash O.S. (2012). Ekonometricheskoye modelirovaniye prostranstvennykh vzaimodeystvij [Econometric Modeling of Spatial Interaction]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriya Ekonomika. Upravleniye. Pravo. No. 3. P. 30–35.

3. Berelson B., Lazarsfeld P., McPhee W. (1954). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

4. Caprara G.V. (2007). The personalization of modern politics. European Review. No. 15. P. 151–164.

5. Cliff A., Ord J. K. (1973). Spatial Autocorrelation. L.: Pion. 178 p.

6. Cox K.R. (1972)ю The neighborhood effect in voting response surfaces. In: Sweet D.C. (ed.) Models of urban structure. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath. P. 159–176.

7. Dumont G.-F. (2018a). Devoluzione addio! Lo Stati Francese riaccentra. [Farewell devolution! The French state recentralizes]. Limes – revista italiana di geopolitica. Gruppo editorial l’espresso. P. 217–228. URL: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01795094 (accessed 18.01.2021)

8. Dumont G.-F. (2018b). Géopolitique des territoires français : décentralisation versus recentralisation [Geopolitics of French territories: decentralization against recentralization]. Diploweb.com: la revue géopolitique. URL: https://www.diploweb.com/Geopolitique-des-territoires-francais-decentralisationversus-recentralisation.html (accessed 18.01.2021)

9. Gimpel J. G., Karnes K. A., McTague J., Pearson-Merkowitz S. (2008). Distance-decay in the political geography of friends-and-neighbors voting. Political Geography. No. 27. P. 231–252.

10. Golosov G.V., Grigoriev V.S. (2015). Natsionalizatsiya partijnoj systemy: rossijskaya spetsifika [Party System Nationalization: The Case of Russia]. Politicheskaya Nauka. No. 1. P. 128–156.

11. Gouard D. et al. (2017). Les trois électorats de la primaire de la droite et du centre. Mobilisation et production des votes aux limites de l’entre-soi. Revue française de science politique. Vol. 67. No. 6. P. 1113–1130.

12. Kovalcsik T., Nzimande N. (2019). Theories of the voting behaviour in the context of electoral and urban geography. Belvedere Meridionale. Vol. 4. No. 31. P. 207–220.

13. Makar S.V. (2012). Prostranstvennyy analiz: razvitiye kontseptsii i vozmozhnosti primeneniya [Spatial analysis: concept and application possibilities development]. Finansy: teoriya i praktika. No. 2. P. 61–72.

14. Mayhew S. (2004). A Dictionary of Geography. Oxford University Press, 2004. 543 p.

15. Mouchet N. (2018). Culture Générale 2019–2020 [General Culture 2019–2020]. Paris: Ellipses édition Marketing S.A. 224 p.

16. Mughan A. (1978). On measuring national integration in regionally divided societies. Quality and Quantity. Vol. 12 No. 1. P. 91–98.

17. Norpoth H., Lewis-Beck M.S., Lafay J.-D. (1991). Economics and politics: the calculus of support. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 293 p.

18. Norris P. (2005). The “New Cleavage” Thesis: The Social Basis of Right-Wing Support. In: Norris P. Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 129–148.

19. Okunev I. Yu. (2020). Osnovy prostranstvennogo analiza: Monographiya [Basics of spatial analysis: Monography]. Moscow: Aspect-Press. 255 p.

20. Prescott J.R.V. (1972). Political geography. London: Methuen. 124 p.

21. Semeko G.V. (2017). Territorial’naya reforma 2014–2015 gg.vo Frantsii [2014–2015 territorial reform in France]. Federalism. No. 3. P. 19–32.

22. Siegfried A. (2010). Tableau politique de la France de l’ouest sous la troisième république. 102 maps and sketches, 1 map without text, Paris: Armand Colin, 1913; rpt. Brussels: Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles. 683 p.

23. Subra P. (2018). Géopolitique de l’aménagement du territoire [Geopolitics of spatial planning]. Paris: A. Colin. 352 p.

24. Taylor P.J., Johnston R.J. (1979). Geography of elections. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. 528 p.

25. Thoenig J.-C., Duran P. (1996). L’État et la gestion publique territoriale [The State and territorial public administration]. Revue française de science politique. 1996. No. 46(4). P. 580–623.

26. Visser M. (1998). Five theories of voting action: strategy and structure of psychological explanation. Enschede: Universiteit Twente. 120 p

27. Wegman E.J., Dorfman A. (2003). Visualizing cereal world. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. No. 43. Vol. 4. P. 633–649.

28. Woolstencroft R.P. (1980). Electoral geography: retrospect and prospect. International Political Science Review / Revue international de science politique. Vol. 1 No. 4. P. 540–560.

29. Zakharova E.A. (2020). Ot “Natsional’nogo Fronta” k “Natsional’nomu Obyedineniyu” vo Frantsii: elementy rebrendinga partii [From Front National to Ressemblement National in France: Rebranding the Party Image]. RUDN Journal of Political Science. Vol. 22. No. 3. P. 475–486.