The “managed competition” concept in the US–China security nexus. Theoretical analysis and practical implementation

With the inauguration of President John Biden, the ideas of “managing” competition between the United States and China increasingly began to appear in the lexicon of American politicians and pundits. Most works on US-China competition emphasize its non-military aspects, which does not reflect the efforts that the US puts into competition in the military-political domain, as well as the importance of its regulation in preventing armed conflict between the two powers. This study seeks to solve a dual task: firstly, to identify the ideational content of the concept of "managed competition", and secondly, to analyze the existing formats of managing US-China military-political competition in the Asia-Pacific region in the 21st century. After analyzing the academic and analytical works of recent years, the author concludes that the concept of "managed competition" comprises three components: 1) regulation of competition through institutionalization in order to increase the predictability, strengthen crisis management mechanisms and reduce conflict potential, 2) anticipatory programming of the actions of international actors by creating incentives and deterrents for making foreign policy decisions, 3) describing the measures necessary to achieve success in competition (outcompeting). At a practical level, the management of competition in the military-political relations between the United States and China implies 1) the creation of international institutions to reduce the like-lihood of military incidents in the South China Sea and the Western Pacific, 2) setting the agenda in the Asia-Pacific region (the concept of the "Indo-Pacific region"), the consolidation and expansion of US military-political institutions (QUAD, AUKUS) with giving them the anti-Chinese focus, 3) US actions that impede the implementation of PRC’s military-political goals: reunification with Taiwan, control over the South China Sea, expansion of military-political contacts with the countries of the Asia-Pacific region.

1. Adler E., Haas P.M. (1992) Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program // International organization. Vol. 46. No. 1. P. 367–390. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300001533.

2. Batalov E. (2006). Mirovoe razvitie i mirovoj poryadok [World Development and World Order]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 376 p.

3. Batalov E. (2016). Novaya institucionalizatsiya mirovoj politiki [New Institutionalization of World Politics]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 6–25. DOI 10.17994/IT.2016.14.1.44.

4. Batyuk V. (2005). Sovetsko-amerikanskie i rossijsko-amerikanskie dvustoronnie rezhimy (1945–2005 gg.) [Soviet-American and Russian-American Bilateral Regimes]. PHD thesis. Moscow: In-t Soedinennyh shtatov Ameriki i Kanady RAS, 2008. 580 p.

5. Biddle S., Oelrich I. (2016). Future Warfare in the Western Pacific: Chinese Antiaccess/Area Denial, US AirSea Battle, and Command of the Commons in East Asia. International Security. 2016. Vol. 41. No. 1. P. 7–48. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00249.

6. Bogaturov A. (1997). Velikiye derzhavi na Tikhom okeane. Istoria i teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy v Vostochnoy Azii (1945–1995) [Great Powers in the Pacific. History and Theory of International Relations in East Asia (1945–1995)]. Moscow: Konvert – MONF. 352 p.

7. Campbell K.M., Sullivan J. (2019). Competition without Catastrophe: How American Can Both Challenge and Coexist with China. Foreign Affairs. Vol. 98. No. 5. P. 96–111.

8. Christensen T. J. (2015). The China challenge: Shaping the choices of a rising power. WW Norton & Company. 408 p.

9. Diehl P.F., Goertz G. (2001). War and Peace in International Rivalry. University of Michigan Press. 327 p.

10. Doshi R. (2021). The Long Game: China's Grand Strategy to Displace American Order. Oxford University Press. 432 p.

11. Drezner D.W. (2017). The Ideas Industry. How Pessimists, Partisans, and Plutocrats are Transforming the Marketplace of Ideas. NY: Oxford University Press. 360 p.

12. Enthoven A.C. (1993). The History and Principles of Managed Competition. Health Affairs. Vol. 12. No. suppl 1. P. 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.12.suppl_1.24.

13. Friedberg A.L. (1993). Ripe for rivalry: prospects for peace in a multipolar Asia. International security. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 5–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539204.

14. Friedberg A.L. (2005). The future of US-China relations: Is conflict inevitable? International security. Vol. 30. No. 2. P. 7–45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/413759.

15. George A.L. (2019). Managing US-Soviet rivalry: Problems of crisis prevention. Routledge. 415 p.

16. Glaser C.L. (2010). Rational Theory of International Politics. Princeton University Press. 328 p.

17. Goldstein L.J. (2015). Meeting China Halfway: How to Defuse the Emerging US-China Rivalry. Georgetown University Press. 400 p.

18. Green M.J. (2017). By More Than Providence. Columbia University Press. 760 p.

19. Green M.J., Hicks K.H., Cooper Z. (2014). Federated Defense in Asia. Report. CSIS. 42 p.

20. Haddick R. J. (2014). Fire on the Water: China, America, and the Future of the Pacific. Naval Institute Press. 274 p.

21. Hass R. (2021). Stronger: Adapting America’s China Strategy in an Age of Competitive Interdependence. Yale University Press. 240 p.

22. Hensel P.R. (1999). An Evolutionary Approach to the Study of Interstate Rivalry. Conflict Management and Peace Science. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 175-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942990170020.

23. Istomin I. (2009). Mekhanizm nauchno-analiticheskogo obespecheniya vneshnepoliticheskogo processa v SSHA. [Analytical and scientific support mechanism of the US foreign policy process.]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. Vol. 6. No. 9. P. 97–110.

24. Istomin I. (2021). Upravlenie obyazatel'stvami v asimmetrichnyh al'yansakh [Management of Security Commitments in Asymmetric Alliances]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 26–55. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2021.19.1.64.1.

25. Jervis R. (1978). Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World politics. Vol. 30. No. 2. P. 167–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009958.

26. Khudaykulova A.V. and Ramich M.S. (2020). "KVAD 2.0": Chetyrekhstoronnij dialog dlya kontrbalansirovaniya KNR v Indo-Tihookeanskom regione [“Quad 2.0”: Quadrilateral Dialogue for Counterbalancing China in the Indo-Pacific]. Polis. Political Studies. No. 3. P. 23–43. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.03.03.

27. King G., Keohane R. O., Verba S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton University Press. 264 p.

28. Krasner S.D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. International organization. Vol. 36. No. 2. P. 185–205. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706520.

29. Lampton D.M. (2001). Same Bed, Different Dreams: Managing U.S.-China Relations, 1989–2000. University of California Press. 510 p.

30. Layne C. (1998). Rethinking American Grand Strategy: Hegemony or Balance of Power in the Twenty-First Century? World Policy Journal. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 8–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40209580

31. Legro J.W. (2000). Whence American Internationalism // International Organization. Vol. 54. No. 2. P. 253–289. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2601298.

32. Levy M.A., Young O.R., Zürn M. (1995). The Study of International Regimes. European journal of international relations. Vol. 1. No. 3. P. 267–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066195001003001.

33. Liff A.P., Ikenberry G.J. (2014). Racing toward tragedy?: China's Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma. International Security. Vol. 39. No. 2. P. 52–91. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00176.

34. Lindley L. (2007). Promoting Peace through Information: Transparency as a Tool of Security Regimes. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. 296 p.

35. McKinney J. M., Harris P. (2021). Broken Nest: Deterring China from Invading Taiwan // The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters. Vol. 51. No. 4. P. 23–36.

36. O'Hanlon M. (2019). The Senkaku Paradox: Risking Great Power War Over Small Stakes. Brookings Institution Press. 272 p.

37. Paul T. V. (ed.). (2016). Accommodating Rising Powers: Past, Present, and Future. Cambridge University Press. 335 p.

38. Porter P. (2018). Why America's Grand Strategy Has Not Changed: Power, Habit, and the US Foreign Policy Establishment. International Security. Vol. 42. No. 4. P. 9–46. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_0031

39. Porter P. (2019) Advice for a dark age: Managing great power competition //The Washington Quarterly. Vol. 42. No. 1. P. 7–25.

40. Posen B.R., Ross A.L. (1997). Competing Visions for US Grand Strategy. International Security. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 5–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539272.

41. Rosen S.P. (2012). Competitive Strategies: Theoretical Foundations, Limits, and Extensions. In Competitive Strategies for the 21st Century. Stanford University Press. P. 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804783187-005.

42. Saunders P.C., Bowie, J.G. (2016). US–China Military Relations: Competition and Cooperation. Journal of Strategic Studies. Vol. 39 No. 5–6. P. 662–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1221818.

43. Shakleina T. (2018). “Mozgovye centry” i ih rol' v formirovanii vneshnej politiki SSHA [Think Tanks” and their role in shaping US foreign policy]. Vvedenie v prikladnoj analiz mezhdunarodnyh situacij. 2nd edition. Moscow: Aspekt Press. P.109–133.

44. Shakleina T. (2020). Politika SSHA v otnoshenii Rossii: konkurentsiya, sderzhivanie i upravlenie [American Policy Towards Russia: Competition, Deterrence and Governing Control]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. No. 4. P.10–26. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2020-4-10-26.

45. Shakleina T.A. (2021). Novyj etap v formirovanii mirovogo poryadka. Plany SSHA po upravleniyu mezhderzhavnoj konkurenciej [New Stage in the Formation of Global Order. US Plans on Management of Great Power Rivalries]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol 19. No. 3. P. 6–22. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2021.19.3.66.6.

46. Shcherbunov V.O. (2021). Voenno-politicheskie otnosheniya Avstralii i SSHA v usloviyah rosta vliyaniya Kitaya v ATR [Military-Political Relations Between Australia and the United States Amid the Growing Influence of China in the Asia-Pacific]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. No. 4. P. 32–46. DOI: 10.28995/2073-6339-2021-4-32-46.

47. Sil R., Katzenstein P.J. (2010). Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions. Perspectives on Politics. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 411–431. doi:10.1017/S1537592710001179.

48. Simón L., Lanoszka A., Meijer H. (2021). Nodal defence: the changing structure of US alliance systems in Europe and East Asia. Journal of Strategic Studies. Vol. 44. No. 3. P. 360–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2019.1636372.

49. Swaine M. D. et al. (2017). China's military & the US-Japan alliance in 2030: A Strategic net assessment. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 424 p.

50. Thomas J. P., Montgomery E. B. (2012). Developing a Strategy for a Long-Term Sino-American Competition in Competitive Strategies for the 21st Century. Stanford University Press. P. 257–274.

51. Torkunov A.V. (2019). Strategiya administracii Trampa v Aziatsko-Tihookeanskom regione [Strategy of the Trump Administration in the Asia-Pacific region]. World Economy and International Relations. Vol. 63. No. 6. P. 25–37. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-6-25-37.

52. Troitskiy M.A. (2002). Kontseptsiya “programmiruschego liderstva” v evroatlanticheskoy strategii SSHA [The “Programming Leadership” Concept in the Euro-Atlantic Strategy of the United States]. Pro et Contra. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 86–103.

53. Troitskiy M.A. (2004). Transatlanticheskiy soyuz. 1991-2004. Transformatsia sistemi amerikanoevropeiskogo partnerstva posle raspada bipoliarnosti [Transatlantic Alliance. 1991–2004. Transformation of American-European Partnership After the End of Bipolarity]. Мoscow: NOFMO. 252 p.

54. Valeriano B. (2013). Becoming Rivals: The Process of Interstate Rivalry Development. Routledge, 168 p.

55. Walt S.M. (1987). The Origins of Alliance. Cornell University Press. 336 p.

56. Waltz K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Boston: McGraw Hill. 251 p.

57. Wright T. J. (2017). All Measures Short of War. Yale University Press. 288 p.

58. Zimmerling R. (2006). Influence and Power: Variations on a Messy Theme. Springer. Vol. 68. 308 p.

59. Zoellick R. (2020). America in the World: A History of US Diplomacy and Foreign Policy. Twevle. 560 p.