Convergence of Corporate Governance Models in the Context of Globalization
https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2018.16.4.55.7
Abstract
The article examines the impact of globalization on the development of corporate governance. The basic concepts of globalization and the factors influencing the development of the modern world economy are analyzed. The process of liberalization of the business environment, development of technological progress and the development of global financial markets have a decisive influence on the activities of transnational corporations, turning them into global companies. These companies operate worldwide and the scope of their operations exceeds the size of the national income of many countries. Global business structure and international nature of the operations determine the need to develop harmonized standards for the implementation of the activities of large companies. Special attention in the paper is paid to the problems of corporate governance, which mostly determines the important corporate decisions and therefore the effectiveness of business development. The article presents the analysis of the main stages in the development of international regulation in this area and trends of improvement in this area. The study examines the basic models of corporate governance, explains the process of convergence under the influence of contemporary processes of globalization, highlights the main factors of harmonization of corporate governance systems. Special attention is paid to the Russian corporate sector and areas of improvement of corporate governance in Russian companies taking into account the contemporary processes of convergence of the models. There is an active process of harmonization of corporate governance systems worldwide. Large corporations in order to be competitive and efficient are to improve the system and practices of corporate governance taking into account current trends. There is a constant search for new forms of governance, management and leadership in big business, and the Russian public companies have to take into account the best practices of leading corporations and harmonised standards of international organizations in the field of corporate governance in order to maintain and improve competitiveness on the national and international markets.
About the Authors
Alla DementievaRussian Federation
Prof. Dr Alla Dementieva - Professor, Department of Management, Marketing and Foreign Economic Activity, MGIMO University
Moscow 119454
Yelena Kalyuzhnova
United Kingdom
Prof. Dr Yelena Kalyuzhnova - Professor of Economics, Henley Business School, The University of Reading
Reading RG6 6AA
Maria Sokolova
Russian Federation
Dr Maria Sokolova - Professor, Department of Management, Marketing and Foreign Economic Activity, MGIMO University
Moscow 119454
References
1. (2010). Korporativnoe upravlenie v usloviyah krizisa (kruglii stol v Istitute sovremennogo razvitiya) [Corporate Governance under Crisis Conditions (Round Table in the Institute of Modern Development]. Voprosy economiki. No. 3. P. 150–156.
2. (2015). Natsionalnii doklad po corporativnomy upravleniu [National Report on Corporate Governance]. No. 5. Мoscow. 304 p.
3. Albrow M. (1990). Introduction. In: Albrow M., King E. (eds) Globalization, knowledge and society: Reading from international sociology. London. P. 3–13.
4. Archer M.S. (1991). Sociology for One World: Unity and Diversity. International Sociology. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 131–147.
5. Baldwin R., Martin P. (1999). Two Waves of Globalisation: Superficial Similarities, Fundamental Differences. NBER Working Paper. No. 6904. 35 p.
6. Bebchuk L.A., Hamdani A. (2009). The Elusive Quest for Global Governance Standards. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 157. No. 5. P. 1263–1317.
7. Bebchuk L.A., Roe M.J. (1999). A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance. Stanford Law Review. Vol. 52. No. 1. P. 127–170.
8. Bratton W.W., McCahery J.A. (1999). Comparative Corporate Governance and the Theory of the Firm: The Case Against Global Cross Reference. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Vol. 38. P. 213–298.
9. Clarke T. (2017). International Corporate Governance. 2nd ed. London and New York Routledge. 710 p.
10. Cofee J. (2001). The Rise of Dispersed Ownership. The Role of the Law in the separation of Ownership and Control. Yale Law Journal. Vol. 111. No. 1. P. 12–19.
11. Coombes P., Watson M. (2000). Three Surveys on Corporate Governance. McKinsey Quarterly. No. 4. P. 74–77.
12. Dementieva A.G., Sokolova M.I. (2017) International regulation of corporate governance. Pravo i upravlenie XXI veka. No. 4. P. 47–58.
13. Dolgov S.I. (1998). Globalizatsiya economiki: novoe slovo ili novoe yavlenie [Globalization of Economy: New Word or New Phenomenon]. Мoscow. 215 p.
14. Foley C.F. (2002). The Effects of Having an American Parent: An Analysis of the Growth of U.S. Multinational Affiliates. Harvard Business School working paper.
15. Gilson R.J. (2000) Globalizing Corporate Governance Convergaence: Convergence of Form or Function.
16. Columbia Law School, Center for Law and Economic Studies. Working Paper. URL : http://www.law. columbia.edu/law-economic-studies/working-papers.
17. Hail L., Leuz C. (2006). International Differences in the Cost of Equity Capital: Do Legal Institutions and Securities Regulation Matter? Journal of Accounting Research. No. 44. P. 485–531.
18. Jackson G., Deeg R. (2012). The Long-term Trajectories of Institutional Change in European Capitapism. Journal of European Public policy. Vol. 19. No. 8. P. 1109–1125.
19. Jackson H.E., Roe M.J. (2009). Public Enforcement of Securities Laws: Resource-Based Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 93. No. 2. P. 207–238.
20. Jacoby S.M. (2007). The Embedded Corporation: Corporate Governance and Employment Relations in Japan and the United States. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press. 435 p.
21. Jeffers E. (2005). Corporate Governance: Toward converging models? Global Finance Journal. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 221–232.
22. Khanna Т., Kogan J., Palepu K. (2006). Globalization and Similarities in Corporate Governance: A CrossCountry Analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 88. No. 1. P. 69–90.
23. Krut'ko E.V., Man'kov V.V. (2018)ю Analiz publichnogo razmeshcheniya aktsiy v rossiyskikh kompaniyakh [Analysis of Public Offering of Shares in Russian Companies] Molodoj uchenyj. No. 4. P. 100–104. URL https://moluch.ru/archive/190/48003/ (date of access: 15.10.2018).
24. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., el al. (2002). Investor Protection and Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance. Vol. 57. No. 3. P. 1147–1170.
25. Levine R. (2005). Law, Endowments, and Property Rights. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 61–88.
26. McDonnell B.H. (2002). Convergence in Corporate Governance: Possible but Not Desirable. Vollanova Law Review. Vol. 47. No. 2. P. 341–386.
27. OECD. (2015) G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. OECD Publishing: Paris, France.
28. Osipova A. (2006) Korporativnoe upravlenie – tendetsii razvitiya [Corporate Governance – Development Trends] iTeam – Tehnologii corporativnogo upravleniya. URL: http: www.iteam.ru/publications/ cjrpiration/section_96/article_3297/
29. Os'movoy M.N., Boychenko A.V. (eds) (2006). Globalizatsiya mirovogo khozaystva [Globalization of World Economy]. Moscow. 375 p.
30. Plihon D., Ponssard J.-P., Zarlowski P. (2005). Towards a convergence of the shareholder and stakeholder models. Corporate Ownership & Control. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 11–18.
31. Schmidt R.H., Spindler G. (2002). Path Dependence, Corporate Governance and Complementarity. International Finance. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 311–333.
32. Semenov A.S. (2014). V Possii poayvilsya novii Kodeks corporativnogo upravleniya [In Russia There Is a New Code for Corporate Governance]. Aktsionernye obschestva: voprosy korporativnogo upravleniya. No. 6. P. 23–27.
33. Shishkov Y.V. (2001). O geterogennosti globalistiki i stadiyakh ejo razvitiya [About Geterogenious Globalistics and Its Development Stages. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. No. 2. P. 57–60.
34. Verbitsky V.K. (2015). PhICS-model’ korporativnogo upravleniya kompanii i osnovnye factory razvitiya komapnii [PhICS-corporate governance model of the company and the main factors of the company's development]. Ekonomicheskie strategii. No. 8. P. 112–125.
35. Vladimirova I.G. (2001). Globalizatsiya mirovoi economiki: problemi i posledstviya [Globalization of World Economy: Problems and Consequences]. Management v Rossii i za rubeghom. No. 3. P. 97–111. URL: http://www.cfin.ru/press/management/2001-3/10.shtml.
36. Zagashvili V.S. (2009) Na poroge novogo etapa economicheskoj globalizatsii [On the Edge of the New Stage in Economic Globaliation]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. No. 3. P. 15–23.
Review
For citations:
Dementieva A., Kalyuzhnova Ye., Sokolova M. Convergence of Corporate Governance Models in the Context of Globalization. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2018;16(4):117-136. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2018.16.4.55.7