Preview

International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy

Advanced search

National Contexts and the Road Map on Middle East Settlement: Domestic Politics of the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict

https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2018.16.2.53.1

Abstract

Highly explosive potential of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, moved aside from top priorities of the regional agenda by new challenges, may add substantially to escalation of the wave of violence which sweeps over the Middle East. Any break-through in the Palestinian-Israeli settlement since ages has been unthinkable without the global political hardliners and regional actors. However the basic precondition for achieving any agreements remains the same: readiness to mutual compromises of the parties to the conflict, which through their actions may both provide premises for dialogue or block any possibility for progress in the visible future. Hence, in order to properly evaluate the current status of peace process and clearly see its perspectives it is important not to forget the lessons learnt in the course of the implementation of the latest peace plan – the Road Map. This is the only plan for peaceful settlement which, let along Israeli reservations, was accepted by the two sides of the conflict and proclaimed establishment of an independent Palestinian State as one of the goals of the final status agreement. The author evaluates “the political stock” which sides of the conflict possessed before adoption of the Road Map and examines achievements of the implementation of the very plan. The author examines the actions of the parties to the conflict on implementation of the Road Map and internal political processes that influenced them. The study reveals the relevance of some results of the period the Road Map implementation to forming the up-to-date positions of the parties involved, such as the collapse of a phase-based approach to the settlement; different vision of the future Palestinian state, which has become an integral part of the agenda; unilateralism which is becoming the dominating line of conduct of the parties to the conflict. The author notes self-reproduction of the policy of unilateralism at a new level.

About the Author

Igor Leshchenya
Belarusian State University
Belarus

Amb. Igor Leshchenya - Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Belarus to the Slovak Republic; Doctoral Candidate, Department of International Relations, Belarus State University (Belarus)

Minsk



References

1. Abrams E. (2013). Tested by Zion: The Bush Administration and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Cambridge University Press. 339 p.

2. Barrari H. (2009). The Middle East Peace by Piece: The Quest for a solution to the Arab-Israeli Conflict. Amman: Friedrich. 142 p.

3. Brown N.J. (2005). Evaluating Palestinian Reform. Carnegie papers. Middle East Series: Democracy and Rule of Law Project. No. 59. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 23 p.

4. Ganim A. (2010). Palestinian Politics after Arafat: A Failed National Movement. Indiana Series in Middle East Studies. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. 208 р.

5. Karasova T. (2015). Israil i Soyedinennyye Shtaty Ameriki: osnovnyye etapy stanovleniya strategicheskogo partnerstva [Israel and the USA: the main stages of strategic partnership foundation (1948–2014)]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. 464 p.

6. Karasova T. (2009). Politicheskaya istoriya Israilya. Blok “Likud”: proshloye I nastoyashcheye [Israel’s Political History. “Likud” Alliance: Its Past and Present]. Moscow: Natalis. 526 p.

7. Krylov A. (2011). Israilskiye poseleniya na okkupirovannyh arabskih territoriyah (1967–2007) [Israeli Settlements in the Occupied Arabic Territories (1967–2007)]. Moscow: MGIMO-University. 340 p.

8. International Trends. Volume 16. No. 2 (53). April-June / 2018

9. Kurtzer D., Lasensky S.B., Quandt W.B., Speigel S.L., Telhami S.Z. (2013). The Peace Puzzle: America's Quest for Arab-Israeli Peace, 1989–2011. Cornell University Press. 336 p.

10. Levin G. (2014). One step forward or two steps back? Unilateralism and Israel’s Gaza disengagement in the eyes of the world // Israel Affairs. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 87–103.

11. Muasher M. (2008). The Arab Center: the promise of moderation. Yale: Yale University Press. 312 p.

12. Nosenko T. (2009). Israil’ v puti: nekotoryye itogi parlamentskih vyborov [Israel en route: some results of the Parliament elections] // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya. No. 10. P. 63–73.

13. Ozerov O. (2004). Post-Arafat Blizhniy Vostok [Post-Arafat Middle East] // Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’. No. 11–12. P. 148–163.

14. Pressman J. (2006). Israeli Unilateralism and Israeli–Palestinian Relations, 2001–2006 // International Studies Perspectives. No. 7. P. 360–376.

15. Rice C. (2011). No Higher Honor. A memoir of My Years in Washington. N.Y.: The Crown Publishing Group. 765 p.

16. Rynhold J. (2007). Peace and Security in the 2006 Election // Israel Affairs. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 384–400.

17. Tuastad D. (2013). Hamas – PLO relations before and after the Arab spring // Middle East Policy. Vol. 20. No 3. P. 86–98.

18. Zviagelskaya I. (2012). Istoriya Gosudarstva Israil [History of the State of Israel]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. 359 p.


Review

For citations:


Leshchenya I. National Contexts and the Road Map on Middle East Settlement: Domestic Politics of the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2018;16(2):6-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2018.16.2.53.1

Views: 11


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-2756 (Print)
ISSN 1811-2773 (Online)