China, Great Power Responsibility, and Global Leadership
https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2018.16.2.53.4
Abstract
Following the 2008 global financial crises and more intensely after the fifth generation of Chinese leaders came to power in 2013, Beijing has set a course to enhance its great power responsibility, to increase its leadership potential on the world arena, and to create China-centered world order. Renouncing its aspiration to dominate the international system and to impose rules, norms and values on other countries, China nevertheless proposes new initiatives, concepts, and ideas, creates global public goods (such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, “Belt and Road” Initiative, the BRICS’ New Development Bank, the Community of Common Destiny), that promote the establishment of such an international system, where China will play guiding and regulatory role. Lacking the leadership experience in the past, the People’s Republic of China is very cautiously enhancing its great power responsibility by learning and adopting other great powers’ experience in global governance and by taking as much international responsibility as it corresponds China’s current capabilities. The article traces evolution of China’s views on its international responsibility and identifies the specific historical periods. It shows the huge differences between China and Western countries in their perceptions of great power responsibility. The article demonstrates the increasing pressure that Western countries exert on China in this direction and explains the motivation for that. By analyzing Chinese official documents and high level officials’ rhetoric, as well as China’s activities on the world arena, the author determines changes in Beijing’s approaches towards international responsibility and China’s role in the international system. Identifying current trends and making prognosis, the author argues that Beijing will further enhance its great power responsibility in the following directions: promoting changes in the existing financial and economic system so to make it more fair, balanced, inclusive and rational, enhancing China’s role in global governance, strengthening the role of the UN, and creating the belt of security and prosperity in China’s periphery.
About the Author
Yana LeksyutinaRussian Federation
Prof. Dr Yana Leksyutina - Associate Professor, Department of American Studies, St. Petersburg State University
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Chen Zh. (2009). International Responsibility and China’s Foreign Policy. In: Masafumi Iida (ed.) China’s Shift: Global Strategy of the Rising Power. Tokyo: NIDS. P. 7–28.
2. He A. (2014). China in the G20 summitry: review and decision-making process. CIGI papers. No. 46. 17 p.
3. He A. (2016). The Dragon's Footprints: China in the Global Economic Governance System under the G20 Framework. McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP. 322 p.
4. Li Sh., Ye L. (2015). How do Americans evaluate China’s international responsibility? An empirical assessment // Journal of Contemporary China. Vol. 24. No. 92. P. 222–239.
5. Nye J. (1997). China's Re-emergence and the Future of the Asia-Pacific // Survival. Vol. 39. No. 4. P. 65–79. DOI: 10.1080/00396339708442944
6. Portyakov V.Ya. (2012). Vneshnepoliticheskie zavety Den Syaopina i ikh sovremennaya interpretatsiya [Deng Xiaoping''s Foreign Policy Precepts and Their Current Interpretation] // Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka. No. 5. P. 14–27.
7. Portyakov V.Ya. (2013). Stanovlenie Kitaya kak otvetstvennoi global'noi derzhavy [The formation of China as a responsible global power]. Moscow: IFES RAS. 240 p.
8. Portyakov V.Ya. (2017). Vneshnyaya politika Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respubliki v 2016 g. [Foreign Policy of the People’s Republic of China in 2016] // Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka. No. 1. P. 4–12.
9. Scott D. (2010). China and the “Responsibilities” of a “Responsible” Power – The Uncertainties of Appropriate Power Rise Language // Asia-Pacific Review. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 72–96. DOI: 10.1080/13439006. 2010.484653
10. Wang J., Song W. (2016). China, the European Union, and the International Politics of Global Governance. Springer. 290 p.
11. Xia L. (2001). China: a responsible great power // Journal of Contemporary China. Vol. 10 (26). P. 17–25. DOI: 10.1080/1067056002002902 0
12. Yong D. (2015). China: The Post-Responsible Power // The Washington Quarterly. Vol. 37. No. 4. P. 117–132.
Review
For citations:
Leksyutina Ya. China, Great Power Responsibility, and Global Leadership. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2018;16(2):60-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2018.16.2.53.4