Comparative Youth Policies in the EU
https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2016.14.4.47.10
Abstract
The article deals with the youth policy of advanced European states, building upon the record of France and Germany. The issue of youth policy efficiency acquired crucial importance in terms of social capital reproduction and maintenance in the EU. The state funds different kinds of programs for young people, and tries to minimize negative impact of financial and economic crises on this part of the population. Germany and France represent the most sophisticated and resource-accommodated youth policies in Europe. The article uses comparative analysis and structural and functional approach in order to address youth policy institutional basis and its efficiency in the given countries. Firstly, much attention is paid to the financing of exchange programs inside the EU as well as between France and Germany. Through the establishment of intercultural dialogue between the German and French youth, who do not have a negative historical memory in relation to each other, is fulfilled the task to bring two countries closer together. Strong state support for the development and improvement of youth policy makes clear that the German and French youth policy models are paternalistic. Secondly, the article accesses the difference between the two models. In Germany the institutions engaged in the policy implementation are more centralized, and the legislation is more developed. In France, youth policy is in the hands of the regions, but numerous institutions of public and non-governmental status in are involved the process of its implementation. Young people in France and Germany themselves are more or less active, which indicates that on the one hand, young people are beginning to take an increasingly active civic position, on the other hand, youth policy is bearing fruit. The article concludes that youth policy of France and Germany is constantly adapting to changing conditions due to its institutional design.
About the Author
Evgeny GrachevRussian Federation
Mr Eugeny Grachev - Doctoral Candidate, MGIMO University, Associate, Administration of the President of the Russian Federation
Moscow, 103132
References
1. Aleksanyan A.G., Inozemtsev M.I., Maslova E.A. (2015). Novye obrazovatel'nye iniciativy mezhdunarodnyh nepravitel'stvennyh organizacij (na primere programmy «teach for all») [New educational initiatives of international NGO’s (on the example of the program “Teach for All”]. Pravo i upravlenie XXI vek. No. 3. P. 159-163.
2. Afonina V. (2002). Gosudarstvennaja molodezhnaja politika v sovremennoj Rossii: vzaimodejstvie institutov gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshhestva [Youth policy in modern Russia: interaction between state institutions and civil society]: Dis. kand.politol. nauk [PhD thesis]. Rostov-na-Dony: North Caucuses State Service Academy. 180 p.
3. Aref'ev A. (2008). Molodezhnye obmeny mezhdu Rossiej i Germaniej: statisticheskij i sociologicheskij analiz [Youth exchange programmes between Russia and Germany: a statistical and sociological analysis].
4. Moscow: Tsentr social'nogo prognozirovanija [Center of social analysis]. 340 p.
5. Baykov A. (2014). The ideological component in EU evolution. Social Sciences. No45 (1). P. 79-90.
6. Chamkaeva E. (2013). Analiz dejatel'nosti molodezhnyh organizacij v kontekste molodezhnoj politiki Federativnoj Respubliki Germanija [Analysis of the activities of youth organizations in the context of youth policy of Germany. In: Problemy i perspektivy razvitija obrazovanija: materialy III mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Perm', janvar' 2013 g.). Perm': Merkurij. pp. 32-36.
7. Christens B.D., Dolan T. (2011). Interweaving Youth Development, Community Development, and Social Change Through Youth Organizing. Youth Society. Vol. 43. pp. 528-548
8. Demuynick C. (2009). Rapport d’Information fait au nom de la Mission d’Informationsur la Politique en Faveur des Jeunes [Information Report about Youth Policy, made by the Information Mission]. No 436. Paris: Se´nat Francaic. № 436. 263 p.
9. Dublet A. (2014). Mainstreaming Immigrant Integration Policy in France: Education, Employment, and Social Cohesion Initiatives. Migration Policy Institute Europe. 20 p.
10. Dy vre Y. (2016). Policies in favor of youth and community education in France. 12 p. URL: https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/youth/Source/Resources/Forum21/Issue_No11/N11_Policies_France_en.pdf
11. Fourcoux S. (2012). Country sheet on youth policy in France. URL: http://pjp-eu.coe.int/documents/
12. /1668139/Country_sheet_France_2012.pdf/62793ea4-ec80-4b45-81d9- 954739946821
13. Head B. (2011). Why not ask them? Mapping and promoting youth participation. Children and Youth Services Review. №33. рр. 541-547
14. Kalinkina M. (2006). Gosudarstvennaja molodjozhnaja politika Japonii, SShA, Shvecii i Germanii [Youth policy of Japan, USA, Sweden and Germany]. Rossijskij jekonomicheskij internet-zhurnal [Russian economic Internet magazine]. URL: http://www.e-rej.ru/Articles/2006/Kalinkina1.htm (accessed: 01. 10.16)
15. Kasatkin P.I., Kurske V.I., Valiev I.A. (2012). Rol' nemetskoj diaspory v rossijsko-germanskih otnosheniyah [The role of the German diaspora in the Russian-German relations]. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. No. 5. Pp. 86-97.
16. Kasatkin P., Kharkevich M. (2013). Reformirovanie poslevuzovskogo obrazovanija v Rossii: opyt MGIMO [Reforming post-graduate education in Russia: the experience of MGIMO]. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. No. 2 (29). Pp. 274-276.
17. Kasatkin P. (2013). Bolonskaya sistema obrazovanija v kontekste politicheskogo razvitija ES [Bologna system of education and political development of the EU]. Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek. No. 4 (29). Pp. 70-77.
18. Krasnikova N. (2008). Vzaimodejstvie i vzaimovlijanie molodezhnoj politiki i molodezhnogo dvizhenija v sovremennoj Rossii [The interaction and mutual influence of youth policy and youth movements in modern Russia]: Dis. kand. polit.nauk [PhD thesis]. Perm: Perm State University. 282 p.
19. Loncle-Moriceau P. (2014). Youth policies in France: old trends and new tendencies. Autonomielocali e servizisociali. pp.423-442.
20. Loshkariov I. (2015). Rol' diaspor v sovrem ennoj mirovoj politike [The role of diasporas in the current world politics]. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. № 2 (41). pp. 127-133.
21. Loshkariov I. (2016). Ukrainskij krizis kak simptom [Ukrainian crisis as an epitome]. Mezhdunarodnye processy [ International Trends]. Vol. 14. № 1 (44). pp. 181-184.
22. L cking-Michel C. (2016). For a Coherent and Future-oriented Youth Policy in Germany Recommendations of the German Federal Advisory Committee on Youth. URL: https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/youth/Source/Resources/Forum21/Issue_No14/N14_YP_Germany_en.pdf
23. Lukin V. (2006). Grazhdanskoe obshhestvo v global'nom mire: tendencii politicheskogo analiza problem, riskov i strategij razvitija [Civil society in a global world: trends, policy analysis, challenges, risks and strategies of development]: Dis. kand. polit, nauk [PhD thesis]. Moscow: Moscow State University. 501 р.
24. Majackij D. (2007). Politicheskaja socializacija rossijskoj molodezhi v kontekste gosudarstvennoj molodezhnoj politiki [Political socialization of Russian youth in the context of state youth policy]: Dis. kand. polit, nauk [PhD thesis]. Moscow: Moscow State University. 187 р.
25. Mezentseva A. (2014). Osobennosti molodezhnoj politiki Rossii i stran Evropy (na primere Germanii) [Features of youth policy of Russia and European countries]. Studencheskie nauchnye issledovanija. No. 9. URL: http://student.snauka.ru/2014/11/2293 (accessed: 10.09.16)
26. Moore S., Hope E., Eisman A., Zimmerman M. (2016). Predicting of Civic engagement among highly involved young adults: exploring the relationship between agency and systemic worldview. Journal of Community Psychology. Vol. 44, No7. pp. 888-903
27. Rosmolodezh’. (2013). Molodezh' Rossii 2000-2025: razvitie chelovecheskogo kapitala [The youth of Russia 2000-2025: development of human capital]. Moscow: Rosmolodezh'.187 p.
28. Safonova A. (2013). Molodezhnaja politika i molodezh' v politike: zarubezhnyj opyt [Youth policy and the youth in politics: foreign experience]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i juridicheskie nauki, kul'turologija i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, philosophical, political, legal, cultural and arts studies. Issues of theory and practice]. № 2-2. рр. 166-174.
29. Shishkin N. (2012). Sravnitel'naja harakteristika molodezhnoj politiki v Rossii i Germanii [Comparative analysis of youth policy in Russia and Germany]. In: IV Mezhdunarodnaja studencheskaja jelektronnaja nauchnaja konferencija «Studencheskij nauchnyj forum» 15 fevralja – 31 marta 2012 goda. URL: http://www.rae.ru/forum2012/21/2569
30. Stepanishhenko O. (2012). Aktual'nye problemy formirovanija molodezhnoj politiki v Rossijskoj Federacii [Actual problems of formation of youth policy in the Russian Federation]. Nauchnyj zhurnal KubGAU. No. 84(10). Pр. 1008-1018.
31. Strezhneva M.V. (2016) Supranationality and the subsidiarity principle in the European Union and beyond. World Economy and International Relations. 60(6), pp. 5-14.
32. T tard F. (1995). Les Trente glorieuses, recherch politiques de la jeunesse d s esp rement [The Glorious Thirty, political search of desperate youth]. Territoires. pp. 55-58.
33. Vorotnikov V., Habarta A. (2016). The influence of labour migration on Poland and baltic states development. Sovremennaya Evropa. No 72 (6). P. 125-136. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope62016125136
34. Wondratschek K. (2014). Country sheet on youth policy in Germany. URL: http://pjp-eu.coe.int/documents/1017981/7110688/Germany_2014.pdf/94b0deaa-a8a0-44d3-b7f2-5f19497f2daf
35. Youthpolicy. (2016a). Budget and spendings. URL: http://www.youthpolicy.org/factsheets/country/ germany/
36. Youthpolicy. (2016b). Policy and legislation. URL: http://www.youthpolicy.org/factsheets/country/ france/
37. Zueva K. (2013). Antikrizisnaja politika Francii [Anti-crisis policy of France]. In: Krizis ES i perspektivy evropejskoj integracii (politicheskie aspekty). Eds. N.K. Arbatova, A.M. Kokeev. Moscow: IMJeMO RAN. Pp. 77-100.
Review
For citations:
Grachev E. Comparative Youth Policies in the EU. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2016;14(4):133–145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2016.14.4.47.10