Dutch Desease of Russia’s Economy?
https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2016.14.4.47.11
Abstract
The concept of Dutch disease or the effect of Groningen became known in the energy-intensive economies of countries in connection with the current trends in changes in demand for vocational education after rising energy prices. In analytical practice it was considered more energy-intensive economies of vastly different levels of economic development of countries and identified similar mating energy prices rise phenomenon services sector growth and reduce the demand for educational professional education services. Some analysts also applied this phenomenon to the Russian economy, especially in times of economic growth in 2000–2008. Using a regression model, the author has considered the relevance for Russia of Groningen effect. Drawing on data from monitoring studies of students 2001–2013 the author determined the actual economic characteristics of the consumer demand for “educational services of higher education” in the total consumption of Russian society.
Keywords
Dutch disease (effect of Groningen),
“feature of the economic life of the world”,
the international trend of structural changes in energy-intensive economies,
modeling,
demand for vocational education
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared within the framework of grants from: Russian Foundation for Basic Research No. 16-36-60002; Russian Humanitarian Science Foundation No. 14-02-00364.
About the Author
Vera Gnevasheva
MGIMO University, Moscow University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Prof. Dr Vera Gnevasheva - Professor, MGIMO University, Principal Research Fellow, Institute of Social and Political Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Moscow, 119454; Moscow, 111395
References
1. Fetisov G.G. (2008). Zadacha snizheniya zavisimosti rossijskoj ehkonomiki ot syr'evogo ehksporta i al'ternativy ehkonomicheskoj politiki [The objective to Reduce the Dependence of the Russian Economy on the Export of Raw Materials and Alternative Economic Policy]. Problemy prognozirovaniya. No. 3. P. 17- 36.
2. Gnevasheva V.A. (2012). Razvitie molodezhnogo segmenta rynka truda na osnove formirovaniya professional'nyh kompetencij cherez sistemu vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya [The Development of the Youth Labor Market Segment on the Basis of Formation of Professional Competence through the System of Higher Education] / Dis. na sois.uch. st. d.ek.n. Moscow: VCUZH. 356 p.
3. Guriev S., Sonin K. (2008). Ekonomika «resursnogo proklyatiya» [Economy of "Resource Curse"]. Voprosy ekonomiki. No. 4. P. 61-74.
4. Sachs J., Warner A. (1995). Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. No. 1. 118 p.
5. Simoniya N.,Torkunov, A. (2015) The European union's energy security and Russia. Social Sciences (Russian Federation). 46(2), pp. 78-89.
6. Simonia N.A., Torkunov, A.V. (2016). The impact of geopolitical factors on international energy markets (the US ase). Polis. No2. P. 38-48. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2016.02.04
7. Volchkova N. (2006). YAvlyaetsya li «gollandskaya bolezn'» prichinoj ehnergozavisimoj struktury rossijskoj promyshlennosti? [Is the "Dutch Disease" Cause of non-volatile Structure of Russian Industry?]. Torgovaya politika i znachenie vstupleniya v VTO dlya razvitiya Rossii i stran SNG. Moscow: Sage. P. 520–536.
8. Zabelina O. (2004). Rossijskaya specifika «Gollandskoj bolezni» [Russian Specifics of "Dutch Disease"]. Voprosy ehkonomiki. No. 11. P. 60-75.
Review
For citations:
Gnevasheva V. Dutch Desease of Russia’s Economy? International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2016;14(4):146–154. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2016.14.4.47.11
Views:
1
Email this article 