Preview

International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy

Advanced search

British Colonial Past and the US Strategic Culture

https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2016.14.3.46.4

Abstract

Recent events are characterized by a prompt growth in civil conflicts: from disorder for racial reasons to international collisions and civil wars of a religious, ethnic and territorial character. These circumstances even more often return the academic and expert communities to the history of the formation and development of a policy to ensure internal security. At the same time London and Washington within «humanitarian interventions» of the end of the 20th, the beginning of the 21st centuries make active and regular attempts to move to others soil (Afghanistan and Iraq are the most indicative examples) their own experience of providing internal security. Understanding and forecasting the prospects of this transfer of an alien model of forming a system of internal security demands a deep analysis not only of its main components, but also of its ideological sources. The special role of law enforcement agencies and departments (intelligence, counterintelligence, police, army),  the inconsistent choice between the principles of democracy and safety requirements (including the extrajudicial restrictions of the rights of the foreign and own citizens authorized by the authorities on the territory of Great Britain and the USA) are still valid nowadays, allowing to say that the methods of providing internal security developed in the colonial past of Great Britain are still considered valid by a considerable part of the expert community of the USA (though aren't always effective in practice), and studying them has not only an academic, but also a political value. In the light of the recently declassified documents on the activity of security services of Great Britain and the USA after World War II, in countries of «The third world» and also the modern international contradictions connected with attempts to introduce the model of providing internal security created on the basis of colonial experience of Great Britain to various countries of the modern world, there is a need to study this policy, and the development of structures, forms and methods of providing internal security in Great Britain and the USA as the universal recipe for «counterinsurgency operations» and «operations of stabilization». The present article represents the analysis of this process in the conditions of «Cold war» and «War on terror» at the level of strategic thinking as one of the most characteristic and essential aspects of transition from an era of global colonial empires to an era of nuclear superpowers.

About the Author

Stanislav Malkin
Samara State Social and Teaching University
Russian Federation

Prof. Dr Stanislav Malkin – Professor, Department of World History, Samara State University for Social Sciences and Pedagogy

Samara, 443099



References

1. Deriglazova L. (2010). Assimetrichnyj konflikt v sovremennoj amerikanskoj politologii [Asymmetric conflict in contemporary American political studies]. Mezhdunarodnye processy. Tom 8. № 2 (23). Maj-avgust. S. 51–64.

2. Afghanistan: The Grate Game Revisited / Ed. by R. Klass. New York: Freedom House, 1987

3. Anderson D. (2005). Histories of the Hanged: Britain’s Dirty War and the End of Empire. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. 406 p.

4. Beckett I. (2001). Modern Insurgencies and Counter-insurgencies: Guerrillas and their Opponents since 1750. London: Routledge. 268 p.

5. Beckett I. (2012). The Historiography of Insurgency. The Routledge Handbook of Insurgency and Counterinsurgency. London: Routledge. P. 23–28.

6. Beckett I.F.W. (2005). Insurgency in Iraq. A Historical Perspective. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College. Carlisle Barracks: SSI Press. 27 p.

7. Bennett H. (2010). Minimum force in British counterinsurgency. Small Wars and Insurgencies. 21 (3). P. 459–475.

8. Bennett H. (2007). The Other Side of the COIN: Minimum and Exemplary Force in British Counterinsurgency in Kenya. Small Wars and Insurgencies. 18 (4). P. 638–664.

9. Boer C.B. (2013). Myths and Realities of Minimum Force in British Counterinsurgency Doctrine and Practice. Thesis. Naval Postgraduate School. Monterey. 104 p.

10. Callwell C.E. (1906). Small Wars. Their principles and practice. London: General Staff – War Office. 576 p.

11. Clover J.P. (2006). The British Southern Campain in the Revolutionary War: Implications for Contemporary Counterinsurgency. MA Thesis. U.S. Army War College Strategy Research Project. U.S. Army War College. Carlisle Barracks. 36 p.

12. Hoffman F. (ed.) (2006). Counterinsurgency. A Symposium, April 16–20, 1962. The RAND Corporation’s Washington Office. Santa Monica. 182 p.

13. Duties in Aid of the Civil Power (1937). London: H.M. Stationery Office. The National Archives. War Office 279/469.

14. Elkins C. (2005). Imperial Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain’s Gulag in Kenya. New York: Holt Paperbacks. 496 p.

15. (2006). Field Manual, Marine Corps Warfighting Publication 3-33.5. Counterinsurgency. United States Army Headquarters and United States Marine Corps Combat Development Command. Washington, DC. 242 p.

16. Galula D. Pacification in Algeria. 1956-1968. Memorandum sponsored by the Department of Defense, Contract SD-79. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation, 1964 (2006). 326 p.

17. Gonzalez R. (2007). Towards mercenary anthropology? US Counterinsurgency Field Manual 3-24 and the military-anthropology complex. Anthropology Today. 23 (3). P. 16–17.

18. Gwynn C. (1939). Imperial Policing. London: Macmillan and co. ltd. 427 p.

19. Heir A., Robinson N. (2007). State-Building: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. 220 p.

20. Hevia J. (2012). The Imperial Security State. British Colonial Knowledge and Empire-Building in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 313 p.

21. Hitz F. (2005). The Great Game. The Myth and Reality of Espionage. New York.

22. Hoffman F.G. (2007). Neo-Classical Counterinsurgency? Parameters. Summer. P. 47–87.

23. (1949). Imperial Policing and Duties in Aid of the Civil Power. London: H.M. Stationery Office. The National Archives. War Office 279/391.

24. Jacobsen K.E. (2003). Condact of the Partisan War in the Revolutionary South. MA Thesis. United States Army Command and General Staff College. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. 90 p.

25. Jager S.M. (2007). On the Uses of Cultural Knowledge. U.S. Army War College. Strategic Studies Institute. Carlisle Barracks: SSI Press. 38 p.

26. Kalinovsky A. (2010). The Blind Leading the Blind: Soviet Advisors, Counter-Insurgency and Nation-Building in Afghanistan. Cold war International History Project. Working Paper Series. Working Paper № 60. Washington: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. 38 p.

27. (1957). Keeping the Peace (Duties in Support of the Civil Power). London: H.M. Stationery Office. The National Archives. War Office 279/286.

28. Kilcullen D. (2005). Countering global insurgency. Journal of strategic studies. 28. P. 597–617.

29. Kilcullen D. (2006). Counterinsurgency Redux. Survival: Global politics and strategy. 48. P. 111–130.

30. Kitson F. (1971). Low Intensity Operations: Subversion, Insurgency, Peace-Keeping. London: Stackpole Books. 208 p.

31. Komer R.W. (1972). The Malayan Emergency in Retrospect: Organization of A Successful Counterinsurgency Effort. Memorandum № R 957-ARPA. Supported by the Advances Research Projects Agency. Contract № DAHC 15 67 C 0142. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation. 108 p.

32. Long A. (2006). On «Other War».Lessons from Five Decades of RAND Counterinsurgency Research. The RAND Corporation. Santa Monica. 119 p.

33. Long A. (2008). Doctrine of Eternal Recurrence. The U.S. Military and Counterinsurgency Doctrine, 1960– 1970 and 2003–2006. The RAND Corporation. Santa Monica. 48 p.

34. Mack A. (1975). Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict. World Politics. Vol. 27. No. 2 (January). P. 175–200.

35. McFate M. (2005). Anthropology and counterinsurgency: the strange story of their curious relationship. Military Review. March-April. P. 24–38.

36. McFate M., Jackson A. (2005). An Organizational Solution for DoD’s Cultural Knowledge Needs. Military Review. July–August. P. 18–21.

37. Melnik K. (1964). Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in Algeria. Memorandum sponsored by the Department of Defense, Contract SD-79. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation. 311 p.

38. Melnik C. (1967). The French Campaign against the FLN. Memorandum RM-5449-ISA. Sponsored by the Department of Defense, Contract SD-79. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation. 76 p.

39. (1936). Military Lessons of the Arab Rebellion in Palestine. The National Archives. War Office 191/70.

40. Mockaitis T.R. (1990). British Counterinsurgency, 1919–60. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 210 p.

41. Mockaitis T.R. (1993). Low-Intensity Conflict: the British Experience. Conflict Quarterly. Winter. P. 7–16.

42. Mockaitis T.R. (2007). The Phoenix of Counterinsurgency. The Journal of Conflict Studies. Summer. P. 9–21.

43. Montanus P.D. (2005). A Failed Counterinsurgency Strategy: The British Southern Campaign – 1780– 1781. Are there Lessons for Today? MA Thesis. U.S. Army War College Strategy Research Project. U.S. Army War College. Carlisle Barracks. 35 p.

44. Mumford A. (2009). From Belfast to Basra: Britain and the «Tri-partite Counter-Insurgency Model». PhD Thesis. University of Warwick. 397 p.

45. Mumford A. (2011). Punctuating the Counterinsurgency Myth. Britain and Irregular Warfare in the Past, Present and Future. U.S. Army War College. Strategic Studies Institute. Advancing Strategic Thought Series. Carlisle Barracks: SSI Press. 38 p.

46. Nagle J.A. (2002). Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam: Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife. Westport: Praeger. 249 p.

47. (1934). Notes on Imperial Policing. London: H.M. Stationery Office. The National Archives. War Office 279/796.

48. (2006). Operation Banner. An Analysis of Military Operations in Northern Ireland. Prepared under the direction of the Chief of the General Staff. Army Code 71842.

49. Paget J. (1967). Counter-insurgency Operations: Techniques of Guerrilla Warfare. London: Faber and Faber. 189 p.

50. Petraeus D.H. (1987). The American military and the lessons of Vietnam: A Study of Military Influence and the Use of Force in the Post-Vietnam Era. PhD Thesis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

51. Porch D. (2013). Counterinsurgency. Exposing the Myths of the New Way of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 445 p.

52. Record of the Rebellion in Ireland. 1922–1923. The National Archives. War Office 141/94.

53. Rich P.B. (2010). Counterinsurgency or War on Terror? The War in Afghanistan and the Debate on Western Strategy. Small Wars and Insurgencies. 21 (2). P. 414–427.

54. Rich P.B., Duyvesteyn I. (2012). The Study of Insurgency and Counterinsurgency. The Routledge Handbook of Insurgency and Counterinsurgency. London: Routledge. P. 23–28.

55. Roy R.C. (2013). Population Control and Small Wars. PhD Thesis. Kingston. 369 p.

56. (1967). Symposium on the Role of Airpower in COIN and Unconventional Warfare. The Algerian War. Ed. by A.H. Peterson, G.C. Reinhardt, E.E. Cogner. Memorandum RM-3653-PR. Sponsored by the Department of Defense. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation. 89 p.

57. Simson H.J. (1937). British Rule and Rebellion. London and Edinburgh: William Blackwood. 331 p.

58. Stoler A.L., Bond D. (2006). Refractions off Empire: untimely comparisons in harsh times. Radical History Review. 95. P. 93–107.

59. Sullivan J.P.Jr. (2006). The Marine Corps’ Small Wars Manual and Colonel C.E. Callwell’s Small Wars – Relevant to the Twenty-First Century or Irrelevant Anachronisms? MA Thesis. United States Marine Corps, Command and Staff College. Marine Corps University. Marine Corps Combat Development Command, Quantico, Virginia. 39 p.

60. Sunderland R. (1964). Winning the Hearts and Minds of the People. Malaya, 1948-1960. Memorandum № RM-4174 ISA. Sponsored by the Department of Defense, Contract SD-79. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation. 70 p.

61. Sunderland R. (1964). Antiguerrilla Intelligence in Malaya, 1948-1960. Memorandum № RM-4172 ISA. Sponsored by the Department of Defense, Contract SD-79. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation. 80 p.

62. Sunderland R. (1964). Army Operations in Malaya, 1947-1960. Memorandum № RM-4170 ISA. Sponsored by the Department of Defense, Contract SD-79. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation. 267 p.

63. Sunderland R. (1964). Organizing Counter-insurgency in Malaya, 1947-1960. Memorandum № RM-4171 ISA. Sponsored by the Department of Defense, Contract SD-79. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation. 95 p.

64. Sunderland R. (1964). Resettlement and Food Control in Malaya. Memorandum № RM-4173 ISA. Sponsored by the Department of Defense, Contract SD-79. Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation. 145 p.

65. (2009). Tactics in Counterinsurgency. United States Army Headquarters. Department of the Army. Washington, DC. 307 p.

66. Thompson R. (1966). Defeating Communist Insurgency: The Lessons of Malaya and Vietnam. New York: Frederick A. Praeger. 171 p.

67. Thornton R. (2009). «Minimum Force»: A Reply to Hew Bennett. Small Wars and Insurgencies. 20 (1). P. 215–224.

68. (1940). U.S. Marine Corps. Small Wars Manual. 1935 Revision. Washington, D.C.: GPO. 950 p.


Review

For citations:


Malkin S. British Colonial Past and the US Strategic Culture. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2016;14(3):52-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2016.14.3.46.4

Views: 2


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-2756 (Print)
ISSN 1811-2773 (Online)