Changing Geometry of Middle East Set-Ups
https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2015.13.1.40.8
Abstract
The Middle East is a traditional sphere of interest for great powers due to its rich oil and gas resources and geostrategic position. At the same time, the situation in this region has always been quite explosive and controversial. During the last few years, most of the key regional players that were influencing the situation in the Middle East during the 20th century started to alter their approaches to the region and their ways of behavior. On the other hand, we are witnessing the growing influence of several regional actors, while traditionally influential states have found themselves in a rather complicated situation. Thus, new regional realities cause an escalation in the struggle for spheres of influence between the key players. The vulnerability of the situation caused by a lack of state control and security became fertile soil for the spread of new forms of terrorism and violence across the region. This article considers revolutions in the Arab world described as «the Arab Spring» or «the Arab awakening» and their effect on relations between main regional and world powers. It describes the ways great powers in their turn can influence or affect the processes in the Middle East. The main attention in this regard is paid to the role of the United States, the most influential power in the region. Its historical dominance and close ties with key players such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia used to be tenants of political balance in the region, but over the last decade this «frugal superpower’s» regional policy has been catalyzing terrorism and jeopardizing the clash between Shia and Sunni. At the same time, Russia as another traditional player in the region has been demonstrating a balanced position based on respect of the sovereignty of states and the right of peoples to choose their fate. Taking into account the current circumstances, that position proved to be wise. Russian efforts in enhancing ties with new governments and keeping relations with traditional authorities are efforts to promote stability and could be a good example for others. The article analyses the way new tendencies and old issues influence the balance of power in the Middle East. It evaluates the goals and real abilities of the key regional and world players, thus forecasting how the current situation may develop.
About the Author
Leonid KorolkovRussian Federation
Mr Leonid Korolkov – Attache, Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the European Union, Belgium
Brussels, 1180
References
1. Bogaturov A. (2004) “Strategiya peremalivaniya” v mezhdunarodnih otnisheniyah i vneshney politike SSHA [“Strategy of grinding” in foreign relations and US foreign policy]. Moscow: Editorial Urss. 48 p.
2. Khrustalev M.A. (2002) Mezhdunarodnie otnosheniya na Blizhnem Vostoke [International relations in the Middle East] Moscow: MGIMO. 48 p.
3. Kupchan Ch. (2003) The End of the American Era: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the TwentyFirst Century. Carnegie. 640 p.
4. Bogaturov A.D. (ed.). (2009) Liderstvo i konkurenziya v mirovoy politike: SSHA i Rossiya [Leadership and Competition in foreign policy: US and Russia]. Moscow: MGIMO. 290 p.
5. Mandelbaum M. The Frugal Superpower. America’s Global Leadership in a Cash Strapped Era. New York: Public Affairs. 2011. 327 p.
6. Sapronova M.A. Genezis arabskih revoluziy. [Genesis of Arab revolutions] Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. T.9. No. 3. Available at: http://www.intertrends.ru/twenty-seventh/15.htm
7. Shakleina T.A. (2009) Rossiya i SSHA v mezdunarodnikh otnosheniyakh XXI veka [Russia and the US in international relations of XXI century] Moscow: MGIMO. 457 p.
8. Shakleina T.A. (2002) Rossiya i SSHA v novom mirovom poryadke [Russia and the US in a new world order] Moscow: Institut SSHA i Kanady RAN. 513 p.
9. Sushentsov A.A. SSHA i volneniya na Arabskom Vostoke [US and instability in Arab states] Mezhdunarodnie protsessy. T.9 No 1. Available at: http://www.intertrends.ru/twenty-fifth/013.htm
10. Utkin A.I. (2000) Amerikanskaya strategiya dlya XXI veka [American strategy for XXI century] Moscow: Logos. 271 p.
11. Vavilov A.I. (2009) Politika SSHA v musulmanskom mire na primere arabskih stran: opyt kriticheskogo analiza. [US policy in Muslim world: critical analysis of experience of Arab countries]. Moscow: Biblos konsalting. 350 p.
Review
For citations:
Korolkov L. Changing Geometry of Middle East Set-Ups. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2015;13(1):97-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2015.13.1.40.8











