Are the Baltic States Part of the Post-Soviet Space?
Abstract
The authors speculate to what extent the concept of the postSoviet space is relevant to Estonia, which is regarded as the most successful case of Eurointegration. To answer this question, they analyze the speeches of Estonia’s political leaders, the content of Estonian TV news channels, and the official version of national history represented by postSoviet school textbooks. Although the Estonian leaders judge their country as completely meeting the criteria of EUmember states, unlike its “poor relatives” from Southern Europe that are known for their numerous crises, financial problems, and corruption, the authors conclude that the Soviet heritage in Estonia has not been yet overcome. The contraposition to Russia still dominates the official discourse, national identity, and paradigm. There are no new elements of identity building focused on the integration of society into a political nation. The political discourse has not been altered since the time of the USSR’s disintegration. Transmitted to different social strata and the young generations via mass media and school education, it places obstacles in the way of leaving the Soviet past and blocks trends to new developments. The arguments being in use to solidify the Estonian national identity have been already reinterpreted in Europe. Though “Freedom House” rates Estonia as a country with a fully independent media, the Estonian TV newschannels cover Russian topics in the same way as the other postSoviet countries that are not rated in the same way. The narratives in history textbooks are constructed in line with the official politics of national identity building. The history of the country is substituted by the history of the eponym nation. This approach excludes the more balanced vision of Russia’s role in Estonian history. The image of Russia is reduced to the state’s government and to the political leader in power. The Russian “bugbear” helps to manipulate public opinion and compensates for the national complex and emerging Euroscepticism . As a result, the European space of institutions coexists with the postSoviet space of public fillings, phobias, perceptions, and antiSoviet (antiRussian) myths.
Keywords
About the Authors
Olga VendinaRussian Federation
Dr Olga Vendina – Leading Research Fellow, Geopolitical Studies Laboratory, Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences
Moscow, 119017
Vladimir Kolosov
Russian Federation
Prof. Dr Vladimir Kolosov – Chair, Geopolitical Studies Laboratory, Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences
Moscow, 119017
Alexander Sebentsov
Russian Federation
Dr Alexander Sebentsov – Research Fellow, Geopolitical Studies Laboratory, Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences
Moscow, 119017
References
1. Adamson A., Valdmaa S. (2000) Istoriya Estonii: uchebnik dlya gimnazii. [History of Estonia: textbook for dymnasium] Tallinn: Koolibri. 263 p.
2. Berg, E. and S. Oras. (2000) Writing Post-Soviet Estonia on to the World Map. // Political Geography, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 601-625.
3. Conley H.A., Gerber T.P. (2011) Russian soft Power in 21st century: an examination of Russian compatriot policy in Estonia. Washington: Center for strategic & international studies. 45 p.
4. Danilov A.A., Filippov A.V. (2009) Osveschenie obschey istorii Rossii i narodov postsovetskih stran v shkolnyih uchebnikah istorii [Presentation of common history of the peoples of Russia and former Soviet states in school history textbooks]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennyiy klub. 391 p.
5. Fedorov A. (2001) Istoriya XX veka. Uchebnik dlya gimnaziy. [The history of the XXth century. Textbook for gymnazium] Ch.1. Tallinn: Avita, 175 p.
6. Filippova E.I. (2011) Istoriya i pamyat v epohu gospodstva identichnostey: beseda s deystvitelnyim chlenom Frantsuzskoy Akademii istorikom Perom Nora [History and Memory in the epoch of identities: interview with Pierre Nora, historian, Member of French Academy] // Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, №4, pp. 75-84.
7. Kolosov V., Borodulina N. (2007) Rossiysko-estonskaya granitsa: bareryi vospriyatiya i prigranichnoe sotrudnichestvo [Russian-Estonian border: barriers of perception and cross-border cooperation]. Vestnik Instituta Kennana v Rossii. Moscow, Vyp.11, pp. 36-51.
8. Kolosov V.A., Borodulina N.A. (2007) "Bremya geopolitiki" vo vzaimovospriyatii Rossii i stran Pribaltiki ["The burden of geopolitics" in the mutual perception of Russia and the Baltic countries]. Mezhdunarodnyie protsessy, tom 5, N 1(13), pp. 101-107
9. Kopeček M. (Ed.) (2008) Past in the Making. Historical Revisionism in Central Europe after 1989. Budapest-New York. CEU PRESS.
10. Kurilla I.I. (2013) Kto dolzhen pisat uchebniki istorii. [Who should write history textbooks] // Kto boitsya uchebnika istorii? Volgogradskiy istoricheskiy seminar. Vyp. 4. Volgograd: Izd. VolGU, pp. 5-11
11. Minaudier J-P. (2007) Histoire de l’Estonie et de la nation estonienne. Paris, L’Harmattan, 2007. 402 p.
12. Myaesalu A., Tyinis L., Luar M., Tannberg T. 1997 Istoriya Estonii v dvuh chastyah [History of Estonia in two parts]. Tallinn: Avita, Chast 1. 160 p.
13. Myaesalu A., Tyinis L., Luar M., Tannberg T. (1997) Istoriya Estonii v dvuh chastyah [History of Estonia in two parts]. Tallinn: Avita, Chast 2. 168 p.
Review
For citations:
Vendina O., Kolosov V., Sebentsov A. Are the Baltic States Part of the Post-Soviet Space? International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2014;12(1-2):76-92. (In Russ.)