Space Resource Activities in the UN: E unum pluribus?

This article examines the work of the United Nations Working Group on Legal Aspects of Space Resource Activities in the context of the emerging special international legal regime governing the use of natural resources in outer space. It analyzes the positions of states and the European Space Agency on key issues, including the definition of “space resources”; the scope of space resource activities; the permissibility of recognizing private property rights over natural substances extracted from celestial bodies; attitudes toward the 1979 Moon Agreement and the Artemis Accords; possible restrictions and quotas on resource extraction; protection of the space environment; the establishment of “safety zones” at resource development sites; the creation of a special international body; and the equitable sharing of benefits derived from space resource activities. The article shows that an increasingly clear differentiation of state approaches to the legal regulation of space resource activities is taking shape within the United Nations, the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, its specialized subcommittees and working groups. It argues that the preliminary draft Principles on Space Resource Activities, prepared under the auspices of the Working Group, is a compromise instrument of a recommendatory nature, which may facilitate its broad support at the universal level but does not eliminate fundamental disagreements among states on key issues. The article raises the question whether the current political and legal differentiation of state positions amounts to a fragmentation of universal international space law, whose core remains the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, elaborated through a difficult Soviet-American compromise. Against the background of growing economic interest in the natural resources of celestial bodies, this question is examined as one of the central challenges for the future development of international space law.

1. Black H.C. (1990). Black's Law Dictionary. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co. 1657 p.

2. Blazheev V.V., Yastrebov O.A., Tolstopyatenko G.P. (eds) (2021). Pravo i kosmos v epokhu global'nykh sotsial'nykh i ekonomicheskikh izmenenii [Law and Space in the Era of Global Social and Economic Changes]. Moscow: Prospekt. 200 p.

3. Buono S.S. (2025). Governing the Moon: A History. Washington, DC: NASA. 98 p.

4. Chipman R. (1982). The World in Space: A Survey of Space Activities and Issues Prepared for UNISPACE 82. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 682 p.

5. Danilenko G.M. (1990). Peredacha kosmicheskoi tekhnologii: pravovye problemy [Transfer of Space Technology: Legal Problems]. In: V.S. Vereshchetin (ed.) Novoe v kosmicheskom prave [New in Space Law]. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union, Institute of State and Law. P. 77–91.

6. Elvis M., Milligan T., Krolikowski A. (2016). The peaks of eternal light: A near-term property issue on the moon. Space Policy. Vol. 38. P. 30–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2016.05.011

7. Fazan E. (1963). K voprosu o pravovom rezhime nebesnykh tel [On the Question of the Legal Regime of Celestial Bodies]. In: Sovremennye problemy kosmicheskogo prava [Current issues of outer space law]. Moscow: IL. P. 290–304.

8. Gaggero E.D., Ripoll R.P. (1981). Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies. McGill University. 480 p.

9. Garcia-del-Real J., Barakos G., Mischo H. (2020). Space mining is the industry of the future ... or maybe the present? Mining Engineering. Vol. 72. No. 2. P. 40–48.

10. Hanlon M.L.D. (2024). The Moon Agreement—A Swan Song. In: S.B. Bhat, D. Ukey, A. Variath (eds) International Space Law in the New Space Era: Principles and Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 143–164. DOI: 10.1093/9780198909415.003.0008

11. Hein A.M., Matheson R., Fries D. (2020). A techno-economic analysis of asteroid mining. Acta Astronautica. Vol. 168. P. 104–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.05.009

12. Hobe S., Shmidt-Tedd B., Shrogl' K.-U. (2013). Cologne Commentary on Space Law. Vol. 2. Berlin: BWV. 472 p.

13. Jiang S. (2018). The Aftermath of the US Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act: What’s Left for China? Journal of East Asia and International Law. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 9–34. DOI: 10.14330/jeail.2018.11.1.01

14. Kirsanov A.K., Vokhmin S.A., Kurchin G.S., Volkov E.P. (2024). Dobycha poleznykh iskopaemykh v kosmose: obzor sovremennykh issledovanii i razrabotok [Space Mining: a Review of Current Research and Developments]. Mining Industry Journal / Gornay Promishlennost’. No. 4. P. 75–80. DOI: 10.30686/1609-9192-2024-4-75-80

15. Lyall F., Larsen P. (2024). Space Law: A Treatise. New York; London: Routledge. 532 p. DOI 10.4324/9781003496502

16. McKeown B., Dempster A.G., Saydam S., Coulton J. (2025). The space resources fund: A solution to the space resources benefit sharing dilemma? Space Policy. Vol. 75. 101663. DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2024.101663

17. Muntian M.E. (2025). Mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty upravleniya kosmicheskim dvizheniem [International Legal Aspects of Space Traffic Management]. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. No. 2(68). P. 277–302. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2025-68-277-302

18. Muntian M.E., Sigauri-Gorskii E.R. (2023). Opyt Yaponii v oblasti issledovaniya i ispol'zovaniya kosmicheskogo prostranstva: nacional'nye i mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty [Japan's Experience in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space: National and International Legal Aspects]. Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2023. No. 8(184). P. 226–233. DOI 10.24158/tipor.2023.8.29.

19. Nozari F. (1979). Kosmicheskoe pravo [Space Law]. Ed. by Yu. M. Kolosov. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura. 230 p.

20. Piradov A.S. (1974). Istoriya stanovleniya kosmicheskogo prava [History of the Formation of Space Law]. In: A. S. Piradov. Mezhdunarodnoe kosmicheskoe pravo [International Space Law]. Moscow. P. 36–54.

21. Piradov A.S. (ed.) (1985). Mezhdunarodnoe kosmicheskoe pravo [International Space Law]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 208 p.

22. Shaw M. (2017). International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1033 p.

23. Johnson C.D. (ed.) (2025) The COPUOS Briefing Book. Secure World Foundation. 107 p.

24. Vasilevskaya E.G. (1974). Soderzhanie yuridicheskogo ponyatiya «nebesnye tela» [The content of the legal concept of "celestial bodies"]. In: A.S. Piradov (ed.) Mezhdunarodnoe kosmicheskoe pravo [International Space Law]. Moscow. P. 97–100.

25. Vereschetin V.S., Danilenko G.M. (1985). Custom as a Source of International Law of Outer Space. Journal of Space Law. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 22–34.

26. Vylegzhanin A., Yuzbashyan M., Alekseev M. (2023). Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya kosmicheskaya politika SShA: priglashenie k utochneniyu statusa prirodnykh resursov nebesnykh tel ili vyzov bol'shinstvu gosudarstv? [International Legal Outer Space Policy of the United States of America]. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 6–30. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2023.21.3.74.5

27. Vylegzhanin A.N. (ed.) (2007). Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy nedropol'zovaniya [International legal bases of subsoil use]. Moscow: Norma. 528 p.

28. Vylegzhanin A.N., Krokhina P.A. (2024). Zakonodatel'stvo Lyuksemburga o prirodnykh resursakh nebesnykh tel i mezhdunarodnoe pravo [Legislation of Luxemburg on Natural Resources of Celestial Bodies and International Law]. Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 3. P. 17–35. DOI: 10.24833/0869-0049-2024-3-17-35

29. Vylegzhanin A.N., Yuzbashyan M. (2024). Status prirodnykh resursov nebesnykh tel: novelly, oboznachennye praktikoy gosudarstv [Status of the Natural Resources of Celestial Bodies: Novelties of the Practice of States]. State and Law. No. 1. P. 147–158. DOI: 10.31857/S1026945224010143

30. Vylegzhanin A.N., Yuzbashyan M.R., Muntian M.E. (2024). Kosmicheskaya politika Yaponii: mezhdunarodnopravovoi rakurs [Japanese space policy: An international legal perspective]. Japanese Studies in Russia. No. 4. P. 48–69. DOI: 10.55105/2500-2872-2024-4-48-69

31. Wang G., Huang X. (2023). On the common heritage of mankind principle in space. Acta Astronautica. Vol. 211. P. 926–938. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.07.002

32. Wang G., Huang X. (2024). The establishment of the priority right in space resources activities. Advances in Space Research. Vol. 73. No. 1. P. 918–932. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2023.11.031

33. Yuzbashyan M.R. (2017). Zakon SShA ob issledovanii i ispol'zovanii kosmicheskikh resursov 2015 g. i mezhdunarodnoe kosmicheskoe pravo [The US Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act of 2015 and the International Space Law]. Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 2. P. 71–86. DOI: 10.24833/0869-0049-2017-106-2-71-86

34. Zhukov G.P. (1966). Kosmicheskoe pravo [Space Law]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 296 p.

35. Zhukov G.P., Kolosov Yu.M. (eds) (1999). Mezhdunarodnoe kosmicheskoe pravo [International Space Law] (1999). Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 360 p.

36. Zwart M., Henderson S., Neumann M. (2023). Space resource activities and the evolution of international space law. Acta Astronautica. Vol. 211. P. 155–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.06.009