‘Small Steps’ Approach to Conflict Settlement

The article analyzes the phenomenon of the small steps tactics in the peace process. An attempt is made to demonstrate how the systematic interaction of the parties to resolve non-politicized issues allows either to avoid another "freeze" of the negotiation process, or, at least, to maintain an informal dialogue when negotiations are not conducted at the political and diplomatic level. This approach is adjacent to the Track II diplomacy or one-and-a-half track diplomacy, as well as to the concepts of sustainable dialogue and confidence building measures. Reconciliation and finding a reliable formula for settlement is impossible in cases of protracted and smoldering conflicts without creating a sufficient level of mutual trust, at least between those social groups of representatives of the parties who form the political agenda and who are at the negotiating table. The study allowed the author to identify the similarity of confidence building measures and the "small steps" tactics, as well as conceptual differences that allow us to talk about its innovative nature. The article reviews the positive narratives of the "small steps" tactics and identifies limitations for its application. For this purpose, archival documents of the negotiation process, reports of the OSCE and foreign ministries of the parties to the conflict, statements of the involved participants, as well as the personal experience of the author, who was involved for a number of years in the negotiation process on the Transdnistrian settlement in the "5+2" format. The paper concludes that the "small steps" tactic is not able to resolve the conflict or build a settlement model, but, thanks to the principle of mutual security of behavior models, it makes it possible to achieve a change in the relations of the parties to the conflict, to transfer them from confrontational to cooperative, thus influencing the situation in the conflict zone.

1. Alekseeva T.A., Kazantsev A.A. (2012). Vneshnepoliticheskii protsess. Sravnitel'nyi analiz [Foreign Policy Process. Comparative Analysis]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. 223 p.

2. Cimmino R. (2019). The Transnistrian Gambit. Harvard International Review. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 15–17.

3. Cristescu R., Matveev D. (2011). Peacebuilding and Conflict Prevention in Moldova: the role of the EU. Civil Society Dialogue Network (CSDN). 30 p. Available at: http://eplo.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/EPLO_CSDN_Background-doc_Study_Moldova.pdf (accessed: 20.07.2021).

4. Diamond L., McDonald J. W. (1996). Multi-Track Diplomacy: A Systems Approach to Peace. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press. 192 p.

5. Douglas N., Wolff S. (2018). Economic Confidence-Building Measures and Conflict Settlement: The Case of Transdniestria. ZOIS Work in Progress. Vol. 1. 18 p.

6. Istomin I., Bolgova I. (2016). Transnistrian strategy in the context of Russian–Ukrainian relations: the rise and failure of “dual alignment”. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 169–194. DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2016.1148412.

7. Fisher R., Brown S. (1989). Getting together: Building relationships as we negotiate. Penguin. 158 p.

8. Fouere E. (2015). OSCE’s efforts to resolve the conflict. In: Bebler A. (ed.) “Frozen conflicts” in Europe. Verlag Barbara Budrich. P. 57–68.

9. Freedman L. (2017). The transformation of strategic affairs. Routledge. 144 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820001.

10. Herbert S. (2014). Lessons from confidence building measures. Governance Social Development Humanitarian Conflict Helpdesk research report. No. 1131. P. 1–10.

11. Kazantsev A. A., Rutland, P., Medvedeva, S. M., Safranchuk, I. A. (2020). Russia’s policy in the “frozen conflicts” of the post-Soviet space: from ethno-politics to geopolitics. Caucasus Survey. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 142–162.

12. Kemoklidze N., Wolff S. (2020). Trade as a confidence-building measure in protracted conflicts: the cases of Georgia and Moldova compared. Eurasian Geography and Economics. Vol. 61. No. 3. P. 305–332.

13. Khun’i L. (2015). O vozmozhnosti primeneniya mekhanizma «mer ukrepleniya doveriya» v otnoshenii Kitaya i Taivanya [On The Possibility Of Applying The Mechanism Of “Confidence Building Measures” in relation to China and Taiwan]. Mezhdunarodnaya analitika. No. 4. P. 96–109. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2015-0-4-96-109.

14. Lebedeva M.M. (2015). Publichnaya diplomatiya v uregulirovanii konfliktov [Public Diplomacy In Conflict Resolution]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 45–56.

15. McDonald J. W., Bendahmane D. B. (Eds.) (1987). Conflict Resolution: Track Two Diplomacy. Washington D.C.: Foreign Service Institute, US Department of State. 89 p.

16. Montville J. V. (1993). The healing function in political conflict resolution. In: Conflict resolution theory and practice: Integration and application. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press. P. 112–127.

17. Montville J. V. (2006). Track two diplomacy: The work of healing history. Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy & International Relations. Vol. 7.

18. Mikhailov S. A. (2013). Politika Evropeiskogo soyuza v otnoshenii Moldavii i pridnestrovskogo uregulirovaniya: institutsional'nyi i natsional'nyi aspekty [European Union Policy towards Moldova and the Transnistrian Settlement: Institutional and National Aspects]. Problemy natsional'noi strategii. No. 2. P. 60–77.

19. Osgood C. E. (1964). The psychologist in international affairs. American Psychologist. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0039907.

20. Pikles K. (2009). Sovmestno obsuzhdaya vozmozhnye mery [Discussing Possible Measures Together] Discussing possible measures together. Zhurnal OBSE. October-November. P. 18–21. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/4/b/67907.pdf (accessed: 20.07.2021).

21. Popescu N., Litra L. (2012). Transnistria: A bottom-up solution. European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). 16 p.

22. Raimann K. (2007). K transformatsii konflikta: obzor sovremennykh teorii uregulirovaniya konfliktov [Towards Conflict Transformation: A Review of Contemporary Theories of Conflict Resolution]. In: Tishkov V. A., Ustinova M. (eds) Etnopoliticheskij konflikt: puti transformatsii. Nastol’naya kniga Bergkhofskogo tsentra. P. 51–76.

23. Rainkhardt R.O. (2020). Novye formy i metody diplomatii [New Forms and Methods of Diplomacy]. Mezhdunarodnaya analitika. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 11–20. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2020-11-4-11-20.

24. Ramler Ph. (2011). Confidence-building measures in the Transnistrian. Presentation for the OSCE Chairmanship Workshop on Post-Conflict Rehabilitation: Stabilization, Reconstruction and Peace building, Working Session. Vol. 2. P. 1–5.

25. Robson C., McCartan K. (2016). Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. Wiley. 374 p.

26. Rogstad A. (2012). Imperialistisk plan eller post-imperialistisk refleks? Russlands Transnistria-politikk revurdert [Imperialist plan or post-imperialist reflex? Re-assessing Russia’s Transnistria policy]. Nordisk Østforum. Vol. 26. No. 1. P. 31–52.

27. Schelling T. C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. 204 p.

28. Shtanski N.V. (2014). Osobennosti uregulirovaniya «konfliktov identichnosti»: kazus Pridnestrov'ya [Specifics of The Settlement of "Identity Conflicts": The Case of Transdnistria]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. No. 1–2. P. 33–50.

29. Shtanski N.V., Palamarchuk D. N., Kambur D. N. (2014). Blokada Pridnestrov'ya: vyzhivanie vmesto razvitiya. Ves' put' mezh dvukh ognei: rabochaya tetrad' [Blockade of Transdnistria: Survival Instead of Development. All The Way Between Two Fires: Workbook] Bendery: Poligrafist. 56 p.

30. Sonders G. G. (2019). Ustoichivyi dialog v konfliktakh: transformatsii i izmeneniya [Sustainable Dialogue in Conflicts: Transformation and Change]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. 382 p.

31. Stepanova E. A. (2019). Dinamika dialoga v konfliktakh: vtoroi trek [The Dynamics of Dialogue in Conflicts: Track Two]. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti. No. 1(56). P. 135–146. https://doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2019-1-135-146.

32. Wolff S. (2012). Confidence-building Measures An Overview of Elite-level Options. URL: http://www.stefanwolff.com/files/Confidence-building%20Measures.pdf (accessed: 20.07.2021).