Prospects for US-Russia relations under Biden administration. Ideological and political dimensions

The authors present complex analysis of US–Russia relations under the Biden Administration. W. Mead’s methodology (typology of foreign policy ideology) and S. Gunnitsky and A. Tsygankov’s theoretical framework (Wilsonian approach) are used. The article examines the motives of Russian and American foreign policies towards each other, as well as the outcomes for the Russia factor in US domestic politics and its impact on the bilateral relations. The authors identify the nature of ideological and political confrontation of the two nations which stems from their mutual perceptions and interpretations of the world order. It is revealed that the strengthening of ideological motivation of US foreign policy under the Biden Administration is aimed to rally Western countries behind the rivalry with illiberal regimes (Russia and China). At the same time, Russia perceives the current confrontation with the United States as an existential threat since it challenges its geopolitical power and national identity. The research looks into such aspects of US–Russia relations as sanctions against Russia, climate change interaction, global security and arms control. The authors conclude that US–Russia ideological confrontation is systematic; steps towards cooperation are aimed at preventing possible escalation. In the near future, US–Russia relations can be considered as a combination (i.e. sanctions, supporting Russian opposition, countering Russia in the post-Soviet region) and selective dialogue and cooperation on such issues as strategic stability, arms control, cybersecurity and climate change. US–Russia relations are not likely to undergo fundamental changes until at least 2024, when new electoral cycles start both in Russia and in the United States. Under current conditions, the management of the US–Russia confrontation remains the major goal for the sides.

1. Deyermond R. (2012). The Republican Challenge to Obama's Russia Policy. Survival. Vol. 54. No. 5. P. 67–92.

2. Gunitsky S., Tsygankov A.P. (2018). The Wilsonian Bias in the Study of Russian Foreign Policy.Problems of Post-Communism. Vol. 65. No. 6. P. 385–393.

3. Karaganov S.A., Suslov D.V. (2019). The New Understanding and Ways to Strengthen Multilateral Strategic Stability. HSE University. URL: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/report_strategic-stability.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2022).

4. Kuznetsov A.V. (ed.) (2020). Fenomen Trampa [The Trump Phenomenon]. Moscow: INION. 642 p.

5. Makarov I.A., Suslov D.V., Stepanov I.A., Serova D.A., Karaganov S.A. (2021). Turning to Nature: Russia’s New Environmental Policy in “Green” Transformation of the Global Economy and Politics. Russia in Global Affairs. 26 April. URL: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/turning-to-nature-report/ (accessed: 20.01.2022).

6. Mead W.R. (2001). Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis. 400 p.

7. Mead W.R. (2021). The End of the Wilsonian Era. Foreign Affairs. Vol. 100. No. 1. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-12-08/end-wilsonian-era (accessed: 20.01.2022).

8. Medushevsky A.N. (2019) Imperskoe prezidentstvo: kak trampizm menyaet politicheskuyu sistemu SSHA [The Imperial Presidency: How Trumpism Changes the Political System of the USA]. Politcheskaya nauka. No. 4. P. 284–311.

9. Pechatnov V.O. (2017) Fenomen Trampa i amerikanskaya demokratiya [The Trump Phenomenon and American Democracy]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 13–34.

10. Shaklein V. (2015) Scenarii budushchego Rossii v ocenkah amerikanskih ekspertov [Scenarios of Russia’s Future in American Experts’ Assessments]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 108–120.

11. Sokolshchik L.M. (2021a). Amerikanskiy konservatizm i vyzov populizma: teoreticheskiy i ideologicheskiy aspekty [American Conservatism and the Challenge of Populism: Theoretical and Ideological Aspects]. Polis. Political Studies. No. 1. P. 78–93.

12. Sokolshchik L.M. (2021b). Meynstrimnyye i populistskiye politicheskiye strategii po vykhodu iz sistemnogo global’nogo krizisa: sluchay SSHA [Mainstream and Populist Political Strategies to Emerge from the Global Systemic Crisis: the Case of the United States]. SSHA i Kanada: Ekonomika, Politika, Kultura. No. 4. P. 73–95.

13. Timofeev I.N. (2019). Rethinking Sanctions Efficiency. Russia in Global Affairs. No. 3. P. 86–108.

14. Timofeev I.N., Mahmutov T.A. (eds) (2018). Politika sanktsij: tseli, strategii, instrumenty: hrestomatiya [Sanctions Policy: Goals, Strategies, Tools: Anthology]. Moscow: RIAC. 280 p.

15. Zakaria F. (2008). Post-American World. New York: W.W. Norton and Company. 292 p.