“Dialogue Partnerships” in ASEAN’s External Relations
https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2017.15.3.50.5
Abstract
The association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is one of the oldest integration institutions in the world focused on the regional political, economic and socio-cultural issues. From 1999 onwards ASEAN has united under its auspices all ten countries of Southeast Asia. Theoretically speaking, this fact creates necessary preconditions for productive discussions of all regional cooperation issues because no regional actor is left outside regional interaction and can voice concerns at the regional level. The Association has no plans to expand its membership further, beyond Southeast Asia. However since 1970s “functional expansion” has become a distinguishing feature of ASEAN. Nowadays it envisages that the Association, not expanding formally, nevertheless establishes special frameworks (dialogue partnerships) for interaction with a number of important macroregional and extraregional players. This article analyzes the phenomena of “functional expansion” in ASEAN activities and the significance of dialogue partnerships for ASEAN today. ASEAN’s fiftieth anniversary thus provides a good opportunity, on one hand, to perform a retrospective analysis and, on the other hand, to appraise ASEAN’s current policy in the region in the context of its interaction with other major international players. Referring to the extensive ASEAN-focused research literature and official documents, this article argues that for the past five decades ASEAN member states have passed through several periods of interaction with these kind of players. ASEAN started by mastering the ability to neutralize external leadership impulses towards the region and gradually moved towards working out its own institutional and normative instruments of managing its external relationships. This system of management, however, is not without its own limitations. Structurally the article refers to the historical retrospective of ASEAN’s relations with external players at various stages of the Association’s own development, analyses the current state of these relations and their functions for ASEAN external policy and finally focuses on the ways ASEAN is trying to manage and influence these relations in the way beneficial for the Association.
About the Author
Ekaterina KoldunovaRussian Federation
Dr Ekaterina Koldunova – Associate Dean, School of International Relations, Senior Research Fellow, ASEAN Center, MGIMO University
Moscow, 119454
References
1. Acharya A. (2001). Constructing a Security Сommunity in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. L.: Routledge. 234 p.
2. Alagappa M. (1993). Regionalism and the Quest for Security: ASEAN and the Cambodian Conflict. Australian Journal of International Affairs. Vol. 46. No. 2. P. 439‑467. DOI: 10.1080/1035771930
3.
4. International Trends. Volume 15. No. 3 (50). July-September / 2017
5. Bae K.H. (2017). ASEAN as a Community of Managerial Practices. Global Governance. No. 23. P. 245263. DOI: 10.5555/1075‑2846.23.2.245
6. Baykov A.A. (2012). Sravnitel'naia integratsiya. Praktika i modeli integratsii v zarubezhnoj Evrope i Tikhookeanskoi Azii [Comparative Integration: Practice and Models of Integration in Europe and Pacific Asia]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. 256 p.
7. Bogaturov A.D. (1997). Velikie derzhavy na Tikhom okeane. Istoriia i teoriia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v Vostochnoi Azii posle vtoroi mirovoi voiny (1945-1995) [Great Powers in the Pacific Ocean. History and Theory of International Relations in East Asia after World War Two]. Moscow: Konvert‑MONF. 352 p.
8. Bogaturov A.D. (2009). Liderstvo i kriterii liderstva v mirovoi sisteme [Leadership and Criteria of Leadership in the World System]. In A.D. Bogaturov (ed.) Sovremennaia mirovaia politika: prikladnoi analiz. Moscow: Aspekt Press P.153‑166.
9. Chong J.I. Revisiting Responses to Power Preponderance: Going Beyond the Balancing‑Bandwagoning Dichotomy. IDSS Working Paper. No. 54. 24 p. URL: https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp‑content/uploads/ rsis‑pubs/WP54.pdf
10. Efremova K.A. (2016). Neravnovesnye derzhavy: M'ianma v strategicheskom treugol'nike «Kitai-IndiiaASEAN» [Asymmetric Powers: Myanmar in the Strategic Triangle: China‑India‑ASEAN]. Moscow: MGIMO‑Universitet. 269 p.
11. Fomicheva E.A. (1991). Vneshniaia politika Tailanda [Foreign Policy of Thailand]. Moscow: Nauka, Glavnaia redaktsiia vostochnoi literatury. 170 p.
12. Jones L. (2007). ASEAN Intervention in Cambodia: from Cold War to conditionality. The Pacific Review. Vol. 20. Iss. 4. P. 523‑550. DOI: 10.1080/09512740701672001
13. Jones L. (2012). ASEAN, Sovereignty and Intervention in Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 262 p.
14. Katsumata H. (2009). ASEAN’s Cooperative Security Enterprise: Norms and Identities in the ASEAN Regional Forum. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 204 p.
15. Kausikan B. (2016). Konets kholodnoi voiny [The End of the Cold War]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. No. 2. P. 28‑40.
16. Khong Y. F., Nesadurai H. E.S. (2007). Hanging Together, Institutional Design, and Cooperation in Southeast Asia: AFTA and the ARF. In: Acharya A., Johnston A.I. (eds.), Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 32‑82.
17. Kivim ki T. (2014). The Long Peace of East Asia. Famham: Ashgate. 232 p.
18. Mahbubani K., Sng J. (2017). The ASEAN Miracle: A Catalyst for Peace. Singapore: Ridge Books, 2017.
19. Maletin N.P. (2009). Pochemu nas net v VAS [Why We are not in EAS]. In Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: aktual'nye problemy razvitiya. Moscow: IV RAN. S. 49‑65.
20. Mosyakov D.V. (2010). Istoriia Kambodzhi. ХХ vek [History of Cambodia. XX century]. Moscow: Institut vostokovedeniia RAN, 2010. 743 s.
21. Narine S. (2002). Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. 241 p.
22. Pham Q.M. (2015). ASEAN’s Indispensable Role in Regional Construction. Asia‑Pacific Review. Vol. 22. No. 2. P.82‑101.
23. Severino R. C. (2007). ASEAN Beyond Forty: Towards Political and Economic Integration. Contemporary Southeast Asia. 2007. Vol. 29. No. 3. P. 406‑423.
24. Shih Ch. (2013). Sinicizing International Relations: Self, Civilization, and Intellectual Politics in Subaltern East Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 245 p.
25. Tarling N. (ed.) (1999). The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia. Vol. 4. From World War II to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 360 p.
26. Tay S. S.C. (2001). ASEAN and East Asia: A New Regionalism? In: S.S.C. Tay, J.P. Estanislao, H. Saesatro (eds.) Reinventing ASEAN. Singapore: ISEAS. P. 206‑225.
27. Tay S. S.C. (2010). Asia Alone: The Dangerous Post-Crisis Divide from America. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte. Ltd. 206 p.
28. Walt S.M. (1987). The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 336 p.
Review
For citations:
Koldunova E. “Dialogue Partnerships” in ASEAN’s External Relations. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2017;15(3):55‑66. https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2017.15.3.50.5