Preview

International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy

Advanced search

China and NATO in Afghanistan: Potential and Challenges for Concerted Action

https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2016.14.3.46.3

Abstract

What has US policy towards Afghanistan achieved since the US­led coalition launched an invasion of the landlocked Islamic country one decade ago? What might have been done differently if NATO and China had cooperated with each other after the United States troops withdrew from the war­worn land? What does a cooperative security regime between China and NATO offer to other countries like U.S., Russia, India and Pakistan once China agrees to take the norm of R2P in its neighbor? This article explores the underlying reasons why and how good relations between China and NATO might enhance cooperative security and contribute to a peaceful transition in Afghanistan. Taking into account the question raised above, this paper argues that China’s strategic depth  should be secured to include Central Asia, the Middle East, Russia and East­Central Europe. Therefore, it is necessary for China to work closely with the international community in order to assist Afghanistan in the war against all sorts of terrorism and to make regional peace, to preserve its stability and to promote cooperation with all countries involved.

About the Author

Li Wang
Jilin University
China

Prof. Dr Wang Li – Professor, School of International and Public Affairs, Jilin University, China

Changchun, 130012



References

1. Brzezinski Zb. (1997). Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books. 223 p.

2. Flockhart T., Quirk P., et al. (2014). New Report: NATO Should Adapt Geographic Division of Labor, Work with China in Mediterranean. Transatlantic Academy. URL: http://www.transatlanticacademy.org/publications/liberal-order-in-a-post-western-world

3. Gao Hua. (2003). China Starts Dialogue with NATO. World Economy and Politics. Issue 6.

4. Herd G. (2012). Shifting Power Dynamics: Implications of the U. S. Strategic Pivot for China—NATO Relations. In China and World. ed. by Liu Debin, Beijing: China Social Sciences Press. pp. 149-151.

5. Kissinger H. (1994). Diplomacy. NY: Simon & Schuster. 912 p.

6. Kissinger H. (2011). On China. New York: The Penguin Press. 586 p.

7. Kissinger H. (2014). World Order: Reflections on the Character of Nations and the Course of History, London: Allen Lane. 420 p.

8. Li Xiao-Lu. (2015). Afghanistan Issue: its Trend and Impact on China. Foreign Affairs Observer. No. 3. Pp. 168-170.

9. Scobell A. (2014). Sino-U.S. Military Cooperation: How do we dance together // Foreign Affairs Observer. No. 3, pp. 22-23.

10. Shambaugh D. (1996). China and Europe: 1949-1995. Contemporary China Institute Research Notes & Studies. 82 p.

11. Vogt R. (2012). Limitations for Europe’s Partnership with China. In China and Europe: Strategic Partners or Rivals ed. by Roland Vogt. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. P. 59-80.

12. Walt St. The (1990). Origins of Alliances. N.Y.: Cornell University Press. 321 p.

13. Zhao Hua-sheng. (2012). China and Afghanistan: Chinese Interest, position and opinions. Russian Studies. No. 117.


Review

For citations:


Wang L. China and NATO in Afghanistan: Potential and Challenges for Concerted Action. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2016;14(3):39-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2016.14.3.46.3

Views: 1


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1728-2756 (Print)
ISSN 1811-2773 (Online)